The 606v2 Fantastic Fantasy Football Homepage page XVIII

First topic message reminder :

606V2 EURODivision

Announcements

Don't forget to take part in the Euro 2012 sweepstake! If you want to take part then please take £1m off your team budget and let the runners know you are taken part by Monday 11th. Prize money yet to be confirmed. Draw is as follows, which will be updated when managers confirm they are taking part:

Everyone in Premier League (who votes on Championship) send their results to:

TwisT and Sodhat

Everyone in Championship (who votes on Premier League) send their results to:

Hero and TSC

Premier League

Real Ale Sociedad - TwisT The London Silly Nannies - SodhatAC ALittleSilhouetteoOfAMan (AC ALSOAM) - MarkyViva City - VivaPaulScholesCunning Canaries FC - ollyrules
AFC Swamp Donkeys - fernando

Table

Borussia Munchingballsack - Sainty


FC United of Bournemouth Town and Boscombe City Wanderers Athletic Football Club - cherriesfan


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Championship

Athletico Bilbao Baggins FC - Hero

Tactics

Jacamos United - TSC

Injuries

Real NADrid© - nadeem2099

Lawyers

Sporting Sideburns FC - Gav

Fixtures

Treble's Revenge - onlytreblewinners

Results

Go Ahead Eagles - Russell_Elmo

Table

Straight-Edge United - TheBrahmaBull


City Of Norwich FC - ncfc_Tooze

A rule about not posting Top 10 lists?

And Crawley Town have signed this guy.

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/eunan-okane/profil/spieler_61583.html

What happened to the top ten list you did?

Someone edited my post so I edited it again with the Freedom of speech. I didn't break any rules guess someone must have not been happy with my list.

I'll have to take extra care with tactics from now on.

Afternoon

Anyone see Parker try and tackle with his head last night?

Puts me in mind of:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ev1S8quL9rE

Which just made me audibly laugh in my office.

What about nobody's allowed to make deals on a Wednesday? Or any deals which take place must go through after the current gameweek then you can't make changes to teams and mess up the opponent's tactics, and then there's no worry about people handing them in late.

that's no fun then


Why not make deals that go through after the gameweek instead of immediately

Yeah I seen that yesterday Sodhat, commitment.

Tactics are done will do a final check before I post them.

Alright lads

How do people get on here on there phones? I get the website up via google but there is nowhere for me to log in? How do you log in on your phones?

Must be off again, just a quick pop on before I head out again

I am always logged on 606v2 through my phone so there is no need for me to log on but sometimes like once every three months I get logged out for no reason but I log in like I do on my computer.

Anyone want Reus and Schurrle, I am willing to swap for quality CB's

Twist have you released Mertens?

Does Jagielka interest you TwisT? I would like one of Reus or Schurrle

Oh I have got it on my phone now.

Hero wrote:Yes from now on tactics are not to be tampered with unless a reason is given to the runners prior and they agree to it.

why has everyone not had there say on this? I sometimes spot a spelling mistake I need to change or I spot something I could have said better, seems a lot of work having to run to a runner each time a word needs changing!

My transfer dealings since yesterday;

Out: Higuain, Ganso, Farfan, Rodriguez, Juan and Rafinha
In: Hulk, Hernanes, Gotze, Ba and Dzsudsak
And up by £5.3m

Should I be pleased?

I very much agree with you Tooze, but the consensus seems to be that hard line rules have to be in place over common sense.

ncfc_Tooze wrote:

Hero wrote:Yes from now on tactics are not to be tampered with unless a reason is given to the runners prior and they agree to it.

why has everyone not had there say on this? I sometimes spot a spelling mistake I need to change or I spot something I could have said better, seems a lot of work having to run to a runner each time a word needs changing!

Write them in a PM to yourself, then when you open it you can read through and spot mistakes. Then just copy it into the tactics thread.

Marky I don't know you lost Higuain he is a top striker you don't replace players like him. I would say no you shouldn't be pleased more happy that you've made it through without losing your fingers.

Or put it on MS Word and do a spell checker.

what's actually going on?

ive missed this argument it seems

Spell checker doesnt always pick up all mistakes though

Fernando wrote:what's actually going on?

ive missed this argument it seems

An I wasn't involved

I always use word for my tactics for everything. I always thought everyone did!!

My deals over the past 2 days

Net Gain:

VDV and Higuain

Net Loss:

Demba Cisse, Gotze and 11m

I don't think it matters, as long as it's recognizable. I mean, I could spell makring instead of marking and I don't think anyone would care?

Unless that gives me an auto 3-0 loss?

onlytreblewinners wrote:I don't think it matters, as long as it's recognizable. I mean, I could spell makring instead of marking and I don't think anyone would care?

Unless that gives me an auto 3-0 loss?

It doesn't Trebs.

It's 4-0.

Hero wrote:I very much agree with you Tooze, but the consensus seems to be that hard line rules have to be in place over common sense.

I think there is middle ground.

Human error on tactics can be corrected (like typos, forgetting to delete a mention of an injured player in the tactics etc).
Players played and tactic used cannot be changed after submitting (i.e. once a player is playing, he is playing. Once you have submitted to play the long ball game, you cannot change it.)
Once both teams have submitted, nothing can be changed.

I would have just preferred everyone had a say in it before a definate decision was made. But as usual it seems aslong as the chosen few are kept happy that is all that matters

It's the people that were online at the proper time.

I'll set up a poll so everyone can have their say.

Hero wrote:My deals over the past 2 days

Net Gain:

VDV and Higuain

Net Loss:

Demba Cisse, Gotze and 11m

My deals:
Gained - Demba Cisse and Andy Carroll
Lost - VDV, Demba Ba and too much money!

ncfc_Tooze wrote:I would have just preferred everyone had a say in it before a definate decision was made. But as usual it seems aslong as the chosen few are kept happy that is all that matters

I don't think a decision was made. There was two distinct different views on whether tactics could be changed after submitting them if one of the teams had since sold/bought a player.

I think it was left that we would gauge all opinions on it next week and perhaps vote.

Who are the chosen few Tooze?

Hero wrote:I very much agree with you Tooze, but the consensus seems to be that hard line rules have to be in place over common sense.

It's not about common sense, it's about whether it is fair or not to be able to redo your tactics if you buy/sell someone after submitting them.

it was very much 50/50 over whether it was fair, so therefore something needs deciding and putting in rules.

hi

https://www.606v2.com/t31338-should-tactics-be-allowed-to-change

Poll up here - thanks Trebs

If you submit your tactics that should be the end of it no going back and changing it.

agree

Fernando wrote:If you submit your tactics that should be the end of it no going back and changing it.

So someone who is dyslexic like me who it might take 5 or 6 times of reading without spotting a mistake wouldnt be allowed to change it
hardly fair is it

Think you should be allowed to spelling/grammar but then you can just pop it in Word or re read before you post.

ncfc_Tooze wrote:

Fernando wrote:If you submit your tactics that should be the end of it no going back and changing it.

So someone who is dyslexic like me who it might take 5 or 6 times of reading without spotting a mistake wouldnt be allowed to change it
hardly fair is it

Proof check it before you post it then

My issue with that is it says the time etc. your tactics are changed, it's therefore more difficult to enforce than the other two options.

Personally I think that's the end of it once submitted.

Fernando wrote:

ncfc_Tooze wrote:

Fernando wrote:If you submit your tactics that should be the end of it no going back and changing it.

So someone who is dyslexic like me who it might take 5 or 6 times of reading without spotting a mistake wouldnt be allowed to change it
hardly fair is it

Proof check it before you post it then

do you want them up before midnight? if you want me to do that the deadline would have to be extended

Dyslexic people are given extra time in exams so they shocked be given extra time here. I thought thisleague was for everyone no matter no predijuce

I'm wholeheartedly in agreement with you Tooze, I cannot see any issue with people making amendments as long as it's not cheating. Neither myself nor Marky were cheating yet it caused a ruckus.

VivaPaulScholes wrote:Twist have you released Mertens?

No I didn't because you said you was going to buy him on the cheap. Why would I give you a freebie. Like I said before...thanks for the heads up Viva

VivaPaulScholes wrote:Dyslexic people are given extra time in exams so they shocked be given extra time here. I thought thisleague was for everyone no matter no predijuce

Did you write that in the styling of some with dyslexia?
We let Cherry in the league, we accept anyone.

Like Tooze said bending over for the chosen people not fair.h

Twist mind games do I really want him or am I just forcing you to keep .hm

Doesn't matter. I have no reason to get rid of him now

Hero wrote:I'm wholeheartedly in agreement with you Tooze, I cannot see any issue with people making amendments as long as it's not cheating. Neither myself nor Marky were cheating yet it caused a ruckus.

I agree but it can be hard to track what is being changed when a post is edited. There needs to be a certain element of trust and I'm not sure there is that in abundance around here.

Yours/Marky's case was very different in that it was specific to a single player, but I think it's a wider debate now.