Price vs Harrison rumoured to be happening October 13th

First topic message reminder :

Will be on Boxnation, will be interesting to see where Price is in terms of development at this stage. I just hope Audley turns up with his head right and tries to win then it might be a decent fight for a few rounds.

azania wrote:Fury is more of a works in progress than Price. Price had a better amateur career and beat Fury in the amateurs I believe. But Fury to me has the greater talent and will be a better fighter in the long run.

Didn't you say earlier in this thread they are the same ability wise?

azania wrote:
Fury is in the Ring's top 10. Price is nowhere. Ergo Fury is streets ahead in the rankings. But in terms of ability they're on par I reckon.

Yep, thought so.

hampo171 wrote:

azania wrote:Fury is more of a works in progress than Price. Price had a better amateur career and beat Fury in the amateurs I believe. But Fury to me has the greater talent and will be a better fighter in the long run.

Didn't you say earlier in this thread they are the same ability wise?

Ability and talent are two different things.

Why do you have a bar with "writer" on it? What's a writer supposed to be?

I write articles for the journal. Mostly boxing related.

azania wrote: What's a writer supposed to be?

I'm only guessing here but possibly someone who writes.

rowley wrote:

azania wrote: What's a writer supposed to be?

I'm only guessing here but possibly someone who writes.

hampo171 wrote:I write articles for the journal. Mostly boxing related.

I see

Fury is more of a works in progress than Price. Price had a better amateur career and beat Fury in the amateurs I believe. But Fury to me has the greater talent and will be a better fighter in the long run.

Isn't that just speculation as well, Az?

superflyweight wrote:

Fury is more of a works in progress than Price. Price had a better amateur career and beat Fury in the amateurs I believe. But Fury to me has the greater talent and will be a better fighter in the long run.

Isn't that just speculation as well, Az?

It is. Hence I said "to me". Contrast that to the apparent factual remark I responded to.