Chinnier than Price?
+2
John Bloody Wayne
3fingers
6 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 1 of 1
Chinnier than Price?
Wilder seems to have poor punch resistance....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rpWqvX3_PW4
no wonder he's been matched tge way he has.
Wilder is a HUGE puncher put is he chinnier than Price? What does that mean?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rpWqvX3_PW4
no wonder he's been matched tge way he has.
Wilder is a HUGE puncher put is he chinnier than Price? What does that mean?
3fingers- Posts : 1482
Join date : 2013-10-15
Re: Chinnier than Price?
If the link doesnt work then google "Deontay Wilder Vs Evgeniy Romanov"
3fingers- Posts : 1482
Join date : 2013-10-15
Re: Chinnier than Price?
Is Deontay full grown there? The ref must be quite tall if so.
Yeah maybe he is China chinned, but he may have still been growing into that ultra long frame of his and I'd expect his punch resistance to have improved since then.
Yeah maybe he is China chinned, but he may have still been growing into that ultra long frame of his and I'd expect his punch resistance to have improved since then.
John Bloody Wayne- Posts : 4460
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : behind you
Re: Chinnier than Price?
I believe the fight was in 2008. Kovalev fought at heavyweight on the same show, beating 2 x U.S champion.
3fingers- Posts : 1482
Join date : 2013-10-15
Re: Chinnier than Price?
He probably is chinny. I cant think why else hes been matched so softly.
catchweight- Posts : 4339
Join date : 2013-09-18
Re: Chinnier than Price?
That's why Fury has been as well.
Ustinov, Rogan, Sexton, Chisora (fat), that bar man who decked him, Cruiser Cunningham....... List goes on.
Ustinov, Rogan, Sexton, Chisora (fat), that bar man who decked him, Cruiser Cunningham....... List goes on.
mobilemaster8- Posts : 4302
Join date : 2012-05-10
Age : 38
Location : Stoke on Trent
Re: Chinnier than Price?
Fury has been matched OK so far. Not badly at all by the going rate of heavyweights nowadays. Wasn't his fault Chisora was out of shape, they weren't to know that. And wasn't his fault Haye pulled out either. Even Ustinov (by todays standards) seem like an ambitious last minute replacement.
Wilder has been way below that although it looks like he will beat Fury to a title shot.
Wilder has been way below that although it looks like he will beat Fury to a title shot.
catchweight- Posts : 4339
Join date : 2013-09-18
Re: Chinnier than Price?
I'd say they have been matched the same.
Wilder has a good win against the highly regarded Malik Scott who was stopped in bizarre fashion by Del Boy.
Fury has a win over Del Boy
No real names apart from that, or talent.
But if reports are correct....Wilder vs Stiverne is next so if you compare that to Ustinov, its only Wilder going in the right direction at the moment.
Is this fight and eliminator for Wlad this weekend?
If so, I can't see fury fighting him.
No chance.
Wilder has a good win against the highly regarded Malik Scott who was stopped in bizarre fashion by Del Boy.
Fury has a win over Del Boy
No real names apart from that, or talent.
But if reports are correct....Wilder vs Stiverne is next so if you compare that to Ustinov, its only Wilder going in the right direction at the moment.
Is this fight and eliminator for Wlad this weekend?
If so, I can't see fury fighting him.
No chance.
mobilemaster8- Posts : 4302
Join date : 2012-05-10
Age : 38
Location : Stoke on Trent
Re: Chinnier than Price?
catchweight wrote:He probably is chinny. I cant think why else hes been matched so softly.
It was only last year that you were saying he would beak Klitschko and that Klitschko was ducking him.
Wilder may be chinny but I don't think it is fair to judge him on an amatuer fight 6 years ago.
Champagne_Socialist- Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 37
Re: Chinnier than Price?
Were judging his chin based on a fight from the past where the participants wore larger gloves and headguards. I think its fair to judge his chin from that fight. We aren't judging his boxing ability, just his chin.
3fingers- Posts : 1482
Join date : 2013-10-15
Re: Chinnier than Price?
3fingers wrote:Were judging his chin based on a fight from the past where the participants wore larger gloves and headguards. I think its fair to judge his chin from that fight. We aren't judging his boxing ability, just his chin.
Nah not for me, his punch resistance would obviously have increased since then.
Champagne_Socialist- Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 37
Re: Chinnier than Price?
Champagne_Socialist wrote:catchweight wrote:He probably is chinny. I cant think why else hes been matched so softly.
It was only last year that you were saying he would beak Klitschko and that Klitschko was ducking him.
Wilder may be chinny but I don't think it is fair to judge him on an amatuer fight 6 years ago.
No it isn't. This is just the kind of fudging you do through your Klitschko heart shaped eyes. What I sais was:
What chance would you give Wilder in this? I really think he has a good one. Klitschko is technically better in the basics department and more experienced (but older). His career has been spent facing absolute crap though, especially lately. Wilder is a monster puncher, pretty good athlete and reasonably quick. Klitschko seldom faces anyone with all of these combined attributes. I think the fight will 100% never happen because both sides wont fancy it enough but I think Wilder is all wrong for Klitschkos standard jab and grab routine and Klitschko would sh1t himself against that sort of opponent.
Note the difference.
catchweight- Posts : 4339
Join date : 2013-09-18
Re: Chinnier than Price?
catchweight wrote:Champagne_Socialist wrote:catchweight wrote:He probably is chinny. I cant think why else hes been matched so softly.
It was only last year that you were saying he would beat Klitschko and that Klitschko was ducking him.
Wilder may be chinny but I don't think it is fair to judge him on an amatuer fight 6 years ago.
No it isn't. This is just the kind of fudging you do through your Klitschko heart shaped eyes. What I sais was:
What chance would you give Wilder in this? I really think he has a good one. Klitschko is technically better in the basics department and more experienced (but older). His career has been spent facing absolute crap though, especially lately. Wilder is a monster puncher, pretty good athlete and reasonably quick. Klitschko seldom faces anyone with all of these combined attributes. I think the fight will 100% never happen because both sides wont fancy it enough but I think Wilder is all wrong for Klitschkos standard jab and grab routine and Klitschko would sh1t himself against that sort of opponent.
Note the difference.
You made many more comments which if I cared as much I would find but I really don't care.
Anyway your own post proved my point.
Champagne_Socialist- Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 37
Re: Chinnier than Price?
Sorry CS, but at no point in Catchweight's comment does he say Wilder will beat Wlad. He says he has a chance with more experience, which is very much not the same thing.
Rowley- Admin
- Posts : 22053
Join date : 2011-02-17
Age : 51
Location : I'm just a symptom of the modern decay that's gnawing at the heart of this country.
Re: Chinnier than Price?
This guy will say anything to fuel his Klitschko fetish. Next Il be quoted as saying Tyson Fury knocks Klitschko out in one round because I think he gives him a decent fight.
catchweight- Posts : 4339
Join date : 2013-09-18
Re: Chinnier than Price?
catchweight wrote:This guy will say anything to fuel his Klitschko fetish. Next Il be quoted as saying Tyson Fury knocks Klitschko out in one round because I think he gives him a decent fight.
You clearly state in this thread on many times klitschko is ducking wilder
https://www.606v2.com/t52730p100-wilder-v-klitschko
catchweight wrote:He wont fight a dangerous opponent like Wilder when he can feast on tailor made bums unless there is 20 million in it for him or something like that. Hes perfectly happy fighting stiffs for big money in Germany.
Klitschko would avoid him because there are easier fights out there for him Why would Klitschko go after when he can make a nice packet fighting this next joker and the winner of Fury and Chisora? Easy fights for him
they will happily avoid each other which is a shame because its the most interesting fight out there for Klitschko.
Wilder is all wrong for him. A monstrous punching, big athletic heavyweight who comes for the knockout. I think he has a good chance.
If given a choice of whoever he wants to face, Wilder would be down towards the bottom of the list I bet.
Read what I said. I said Klitschko is happy to avoid facing Wilder
Just a few quotes from Catchweight where he states Klitschko is avoiding/ducking Wilder.
Last edited by Champagne_Socialist on Thu 24 Jul 2014, 11:52 pm; edited 1 time in total
Champagne_Socialist- Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 37
catchweight- Posts : 4339
Join date : 2013-09-18
Re: Chinnier than Price?
I made it clear that I thought they would be happy to avoid each other. Here is a quote for example:
I dont think Klitschko would avoid him if he became mandatory challenger but he isnt going to go looking for that fight when he can make easy money against much safer opponents. Ultimately its Wilders perogative to chase the champion which I doubt he will do by the looks of things but Klitschko will be perfectly happy with that. Unless he is getting paid silly money then his voluntary defences usually amount to the absolute pits. Mormeck and Pianeta for example. A few easy million for less than a work out.
I dont think Klitschko would avoid him if he became mandatory challenger but he isnt going to go looking for that fight when he can make easy money against much safer opponents. Ultimately its Wilders perogative to chase the champion which I doubt he will do by the looks of things but Klitschko will be perfectly happy with that. Unless he is getting paid silly money then his voluntary defences usually amount to the absolute pits. Mormeck and Pianeta for example. A few easy million for less than a work out.
catchweight- Posts : 4339
Join date : 2013-09-18
Re: Chinnier than Price?
catchweight wrote:I made it clear that I thought they would be happy to avoid each other. Here is a quote for example:
I dont think Klitschko would avoid him if he became mandatory challenger but he isnt going to go looking for that fight when he can make easy money against much safer opponents. Ultimately its Wilders perogative to chase the champion which I doubt he will do by the looks of things but Klitschko will be perfectly happy with that. Unless he is getting paid silly money then his voluntary defences usually amount to the absolute pits. Mormeck and Pianeta for example. A few easy million for less than a work out.
You made many commentsm a lot of them contradicting your previous comments you made onlyy minutes before. You do realise that if you say they are both ducking each other that means you are saying klitschko is ducking wilder (along with you saying wilder is ducking klitschko).
catchweight wrote:
He wont fight a dangerous opponent like Wilder when he can feast on tailor made bums unless there is 20 million in it for him or something like that. Hes perfectly happy fighting stiffs for big money in Germany.
Klitschko would avoid him because there are easier fights out there for him Why would Klitschko go after when he can make a nice packet fighting this next joker and the winner of Fury and Chisora? Easy fights for him
they will happily avoid each other which is a shame because its the most interesting fight out there for Klitschko.
Wilder is all wrong for him. A monstrous punching, big athletic heavyweight who comes for the knockout. I think he has a good chance.
If given a choice of whoever he wants to face, Wilder would be down towards the bottom of the list I bet.
Read what I said. I said Klitschko is happy to avoid facing Wilder
Champagne_Socialist- Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 37
Re: Chinnier than Price?
Its not that hard to follow. They wont want to fight each other, because their are safer fights each of them can take.
If Klitschko wanted to face Wilder, he would have at least made an offer. I mean hes managed to make an offer to just about every other sparring partner the division has to offer.
If Klitschko has a choice between fighting Pineta for 2 million or Wilder for 4 million I bet firmly he goes for Pineta.
The fact that Wilder doesn't want the fight either is a key part of the equation.
If Klitschko wanted to face Wilder, he would have at least made an offer. I mean hes managed to make an offer to just about every other sparring partner the division has to offer.
If Klitschko has a choice between fighting Pineta for 2 million or Wilder for 4 million I bet firmly he goes for Pineta.
The fact that Wilder doesn't want the fight either is a key part of the equation.
catchweight- Posts : 4339
Join date : 2013-09-18
Re: Chinnier than Price?
catchweight wrote:Its not that hard to follow. They wont want to fight each other, because their are safer fights each of them can take.
If Klitschko wanted to face Wilder, he would have at least made an offer. I mean hes managed to make an offer to just about every other sparring partner the division has to offer.
If Klitschko has a choice between fighting Pineta for 2 million or Wilder for 4 million I bet firmly he goes for Mormeck.
The fact that Wilder doesn't want the fight either is a key part of the equation.
So you are saying Klitschko is avoiding Wilder.... which is exactly what I said you said previously and is exactly what you said previously which I quoted.
Champagne_Socialist- Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 37
Re: Chinnier than Price?
No it really isn't. You are determined to hammer a square peg into a round hole. All you see is the word "avoided" and you decide to fudge that interpretation to try and make it sound like I am saying Klitschko is ducking Wilder systematically without ever including the second relevant part that Wilder isn't interested in the fight either.
Klitschko isn't ducking Wilder in the way you keep trying to insinuate. Namely that hes running scared of Wilder who has been actively pursuing the fight. This is your fudging trying to twist what I am saying.
I am saying Wilder doesn't want the fight. Klitschko doesn't want the fight. And they are both happy with things that way. Wilder can go off and fight for an easier world title and Klitschko can go off and fight a less dangerous opponent.
I stated, explicitly, that if Wilder became mandatory for Klitschkos title then I thought Klitschko would face him. Another point you persist in ignoring.
I don't think I can I make it plainer than that.
Klitschko isn't ducking Wilder in the way you keep trying to insinuate. Namely that hes running scared of Wilder who has been actively pursuing the fight. This is your fudging trying to twist what I am saying.
I am saying Wilder doesn't want the fight. Klitschko doesn't want the fight. And they are both happy with things that way. Wilder can go off and fight for an easier world title and Klitschko can go off and fight a less dangerous opponent.
I stated, explicitly, that if Wilder became mandatory for Klitschkos title then I thought Klitschko would face him. Another point you persist in ignoring.
I don't think I can I make it plainer than that.
catchweight- Posts : 4339
Join date : 2013-09-18
Re: Chinnier than Price?
catchweight wrote:No it really isn't. You are determined to hammer a square peg into a round hole. All you see is the word "avoided" and you decide to fudge that interpretation to try and make it sound like I am saying Klitschko is ducking Wilder systematically without ever including the second relevant part that Wilder isn't interested in the fight either.
Klitschko isn't ducking Wilder in the way you keep trying to insinuate. Namely that hes running scared of Wilder who has been actively pursuing the fight. This is your fudging trying to twist what I am saying.
I am saying Wilder doesn't want the fight. Klitschko doesn't want the fight. And they are both happy with things that way. Wilder can go off and fight for an easier world title and Klitschko can go off and fight a less dangerous opponent.
I stated, explicitly, that if Wilder became mandatory for Klitschkos title then I thought Klitschko would face him. Another point you persist in ignoring.
I don't think I can I make it plainer than that.
Catchweight wrote:He wont fight a dangerous opponent like Wilder when he can feast on tailor made bums unless there is 20 million in it for him or something like that. Hes perfectly happy fighting stiffs for big money in Germany.
Klitschko would avoid him because there are easier fights out there for him Why would Klitschko go after when he can make a nice packet fighting this next joker and the winner of Fury and Chisora? Easy fights for him
they will happily avoid each other which is a shame because its the most interesting fight out there for Klitschko.
Wilder is all wrong for him. A monstrous punching, big athletic heavyweight who comes for the knockout. I think he has a good chance.
If given a choice of whoever he wants to face, Wilder would be down towards the bottom of the list I bet.
Read what I said. I said Klitschko is happy to avoid facing Wilder
Champagne_Socialist- Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 37
Re: Chinnier than Price?
Yes. Have you managed to grasp it yet?
catchweight- Posts : 4339
Join date : 2013-09-18
Re: Chinnier than Price?
catchweight wrote:Yes. Have you managed to grasp it yet?
yes I think I have finally gotten it. You believe Kltschko is avoiding a fight with Wilder.
Champagne_Socialist- Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 37
Re: Chinnier than Price?
So you haven't then. Despite the pages worth explanation regarding my position on the quote your policy you will just keep posting the same bit of quotation over and over and ignore everything contrary to in an effort to misrepresent the gist of the point being made.
Klitschko is happy to "avoid" Wilder. Lets rephrase this then to capture the essence of the point.
Klitschko "would prefer not to fight" Wilder.
or
Klitschko "would rather face other opponents" than Wilder.
Klitschko "if given the choice of opponent would have Wilder far down the list"
And lets not forget the other stuff you keep leaving out and deliberately ignoring such as Klitschko would face Wilder if Wilder was mandatory. Which, as logic would dictate, would not be "avoiding" Wilder.
If you cant grasp it after that then you are either thick as a plank or on the wind up. I can never tell with you.
Klitschko is happy to "avoid" Wilder. Lets rephrase this then to capture the essence of the point.
Klitschko "would prefer not to fight" Wilder.
or
Klitschko "would rather face other opponents" than Wilder.
Klitschko "if given the choice of opponent would have Wilder far down the list"
And lets not forget the other stuff you keep leaving out and deliberately ignoring such as Klitschko would face Wilder if Wilder was mandatory. Which, as logic would dictate, would not be "avoiding" Wilder.
If you cant grasp it after that then you are either thick as a plank or on the wind up. I can never tell with you.
catchweight- Posts : 4339
Join date : 2013-09-18
Re: Chinnier than Price?
catchweight wrote:So you haven't then. Despite the pages worth explanation regarding my position on the quote your policy you will just keep posting the same bit of quotation over and over and ignore everything contrary to in an effort to misrepresent the gist of the point being made.
Klitschko is happy to "avoid" Wilder. Lets rephrase this then to capture the essence of the point.
Klitschko "would prefer not to fight" Wilder.
or
Klitschko "would rather face other opponents" than Wilder.
Klitschko "if given the choice of opponent would have Wilder far down the list"
And lets not forget the other stuff you keep leaving out and deliberately ignoring such as Klitschko would face Wilder if Wilder was mandatory. Which, as logic would dictate, would not be "avoiding" Wilder.
If you cant grasp it after that then you are either thick as a plank or on the wind up. I can never tell with you.
Well you said that if Klitschko was offered 2 mil to fight ianetta and 4 mil to fight wilder he would fight pianetta for less money so that sounds like you are saying klittschko is ducking wilder. You said if he was OFFERED the fight for more money he would turn it down to fight another opponent.
Anyway why don't you post what your current views are as they seem to have changed.
Do you think Klitschko if offered a fight with Wilder would take it? Do you think Klitscho would turn the fight down to fight someone else?
Champagne_Socialist- Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 37
Re: Chinnier than Price?
Yes I think that Klitschko would opt to take less money to fight a zero risk opponent than accept more money to fight a more dangerous opponent. That comes with a qualifier depending on the amount offered. I he had two options on the table and one was for 2 million to face a total no hoper and the other was 12million to face Wilder well I think then he might opt to take on Wilder for that kind of money. But if the offer for Wilder was only 4 million, then I think he would play it safe and go with the guy that offers no threat. And no I don't think there is much chance of Wilder taking Klitschkos standard offer to challengers either in the hypothetical event that happened.
My views regarding Wilder and Klitschko haven't really changed at all. I think they are perfectly happy stay out of each others way. If Wilder wins the other title then you might see a situation where they could square off. There will be natural pressure for the fight to happen and with an undefeted U.S heavyweight champion the money should be there to convince both of them to take it on. As I said in the original thread, I think if the money is big enough then the fight could happen.
My views regarding Wilder and Klitschko haven't really changed at all. I think they are perfectly happy stay out of each others way. If Wilder wins the other title then you might see a situation where they could square off. There will be natural pressure for the fight to happen and with an undefeted U.S heavyweight champion the money should be there to convince both of them to take it on. As I said in the original thread, I think if the money is big enough then the fight could happen.
catchweight- Posts : 4339
Join date : 2013-09-18
Re: Chinnier than Price?
catchweight wrote:Yes I think that Klitschko would opt to take less money to fight a zero risk opponent than accept more money to fight a more dangerous opponent.
Now you know how I would describe that sentence?
What evidence do you have of Klitschko avoiding dangerous opponents who offer more money in order to face easier opponents for less money? It is all well and good you saying Klitschko will duck a fighter and turn down double the money to fight an easier opponent but do you have anything to back that claim up? any previous examples of him doing this?
Champagne_Socialist- Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 37
Re: Chinnier than Price?
His voluntary defences are lowest common denominator stuff. Mormeck, Pineta, Wach and these types. I think he targets opponents who he knows offer zero threat and haven't a hope of working themselves into contention to get a shot. So he can offer them small money, dictate all sorts of terms and know that they will pretty much accept them because its the best offer they are going to get. Klitschko gets a multi million pound sparring session and the opponent takes his money and disappears. Klitschko fights his mandatories when he has to and then when its up to him he goes for zero threat opponents. I refuse to believe that he took on the likes of Mormeck or Pineta because they were all that was available or he was seeking out a challenge. They were just easy pay day fights indicative of his way of thinking.
The exceptions are when there is a bumper pay out on the table that make it worth his while to take on a bit of extra risk. But usually he only fights one of the better heavyweights when he has to.
The exceptions are when there is a bumper pay out on the table that make it worth his while to take on a bit of extra risk. But usually he only fights one of the better heavyweights when he has to.
catchweight- Posts : 4339
Join date : 2013-09-18
Re: Chinnier than Price?
catchweight wrote:His voluntary defences are lowest common denominator stuff. Mormeck, Pineta, Wach and these types. I think he targets opponents who he knows offer zero threat and haven't a hope of working themselves into contention to get a shot. So he can offer them small money, dictate all sorts of terms and know that they will pretty much accept them because its the best offer they are going to get. Klitschko gets a multi million pound sparring session and the opponent takes his money and disappears. Klitschko fights his mandatories when he has to and then when its up to him he goes for zero threat opponents. I refuse to believe that he took on the likes of Mormeck or Pineta because they were all that was available or he was seeking out a challenge. They were just easy pay day fights indicative of his way of thinking.
The exceptions are when there is a bumper pay out on the table that make it worth his while to take on a bit of extra risk. But usually he only fights one of the better heavyweights when he has to.
But surely that goes against your assumption Klitschko would turn down ore money to fight Wilder and fight someone else for less money...
Champagne_Socialist- Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 37
Re: Chinnier than Price?
catchweight wrote:His voluntary defences are lowest common denominator stuff. Mormeck, Pineta, Wach and these types. I think he targets opponents who he knows offer zero threat and haven't a hope of working themselves into contention to get a shot. So he can offer them small money, dictate all sorts of terms and know that they will pretty much accept them because its the best offer they are going to get. Klitschko gets a multi million pound sparring session and the opponent takes his money and disappears. Klitschko fights his mandatories when he has to and then when its up to him he goes for zero threat opponents. I refuse to believe that he took on the likes of Mormeck or Pineta because they were all that was available or he was seeking out a challenge. They were just easy pay day fights indicative of his way of thinking.
The exceptions are when there is a bumper pay out on the table that make it worth his while to take on a bit of extra risk. But usually he only fights one of the better heavyweights when he has to.
Some of Klitschko's best names have been from voluntary defences eg Haye (ranked no2 and WBA champ), Ibragimov (WBO champ), Chagaev (ranked no3 and ring HW champ) and Samuuel Peter (undefeated)
Champagne_Socialist- Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 37
Re: Chinnier than Price?
No. I said he if there was big money or a bumper pay day in it for Klitschko then he would consider an opponent like Wilder. But if its small (relatively speaking) difference then he will opt for the easy option. He would rather take a guaranteed 2million against Pineta than 4 million against Wilder. If you put big money on the table then he would probably consider Wilder and take the bigger risk.
He chugs along and faces his manadatories when hes obligated to but when he has own choice in between he targets dregs. Like Mormeck, Pineta and Wach. I mean come on. To me that says "Look Im not going to take on an opponent any tougher than I have to and if given the choice Im going to target guys that pose zero risk".
He chugs along and faces his manadatories when hes obligated to but when he has own choice in between he targets dregs. Like Mormeck, Pineta and Wach. I mean come on. To me that says "Look Im not going to take on an opponent any tougher than I have to and if given the choice Im going to target guys that pose zero risk".
catchweight- Posts : 4339
Join date : 2013-09-18
Re: Chinnier than Price?
catchweight wrote:No. I said he if there was big money or a bumper pay day in it for Klitschko then he would consider an opponent like Wilder. But if its small (relatively speaking) difference then he will opt for the easy option. He would rather take a guaranteed 2million against Pineta than 4 million against Wilder. If you put big money on the table then he would probably consider Wilder and take the bigger risk.
He chugs along and faces his manadatories when hes obligated to but when he has own choice in between he targets dregs. Like Mormeck, Pineta and Wach. I mean come on. To me that says "Look Im not going to take on an opponent any tougher than I have to and if given the choice Im going to target guys that pose zero risk".
But you still haven't given any examples of when he has turned down a big named fighter or harder fighter to fight an easier one. All you have said is look at his voluntary defences but that doesn't prove anything especially when 4 of his biggest wins have been voluntary defences.
You state the names of some easy voluntary defences (ignoring the hard ones) but who did he avoid/duck in order to face those guys? There was no one else available. He has already beaten Haye/povetkin and is scheduled to face Pulev and has expressed a desire to face Stirvine after Pulev in a unification fight. So who else could he have faced in that time period that he has actively avoided? There's no other names out there. Mitchell was exposed when he lost, Arreola recently lost 2 fights, Tyson Fury was scheduled to face Haye 2x so there was no one out there for him besides the people he faced/is going toi face.
So I will ask again, what evidence (factual evidence not your opinion) do you have that Klitschko would duck a harder fighter or has ducked/avoided a harder fighter in the past in order to face an easier fighter for less money?
Champagne_Socialist- Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 37
Similar topics
» The Price is right
» Price KO'd in 2
» Price v ???
» What now for Price and Fury?
» Price Is Right For Booth
» Price KO'd in 2
» Price v ???
» What now for Price and Fury?
» Price Is Right For Booth
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum