Golovkin v Jacobs
+16
hazharrison
Derbymanc
milkyboy
BoxingFan88
Hammersmith harrier
Herman Jaeger
AdamT
The Beast
irishbrads
kingraf
mobilemaster8
Baby faced assassin
Atila
BallchinianMuffwig
spencerclarke
Steffan
20 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 4 of 7
Page 4 of 7 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Golovkin v Jacobs
First topic message reminder :
Not sure if anyone is staying up for this as I guess it's pretty much a guaranteed GGG win. Same goes for Gonzalez I guess
But if you are you can keep me company
All my Irish mates are tipping Michael Conlan to go all the way after last night in MSG
I think winning in rugby today and stopping and English Triple Crown and Grandslam has gone to their heads personally
Anyway...after the Haye v Bellew shambles here's to a good night of boxing
Regards
Steffan
Not sure if anyone is staying up for this as I guess it's pretty much a guaranteed GGG win. Same goes for Gonzalez I guess
But if you are you can keep me company
All my Irish mates are tipping Michael Conlan to go all the way after last night in MSG
I think winning in rugby today and stopping and English Triple Crown and Grandslam has gone to their heads personally
Anyway...after the Haye v Bellew shambles here's to a good night of boxing
Regards
Steffan
Steffan- Posts : 7856
Join date : 2011-02-17
Age : 43
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
He looks average in a lot of fights Haz. Tyson was better than GGG, but he too looked invincible against lesser opponents.
Floyd fought Cotto and Pacquiao. Two fighters a lot better than GGG. GGG is good and nothing special Haz. Take the blinkers off.
Floyd fought Cotto and Pacquiao. Two fighters a lot better than GGG. GGG is good and nothing special Haz. Take the blinkers off.
AdamT- Posts : 6651
Join date : 2014-03-27
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
Why would Floyd dare and fight at 160? After that performance, I don't think GGG would dare move up even one division, never mind 5.
No where near as good as Floyd Mayweather Haz, don't be deluded. One's a boxing genius, the other is a decent good operator in a terrible era.
Do you want me to name a list of Floyd's opponents better than Jacobs and Brook?
Gone please name me one win on GGG's resume as good as Floyd vs Cotto at 154. Please do that and I will concede Haz.
P.s you seem to be taking this rather bad. I am just putting my point of view across and it seems many in the boxing world agree with me now. Better late than never I guess.
No where near as good as Floyd Mayweather Haz, don't be deluded. One's a boxing genius, the other is a decent good operator in a terrible era.
Do you want me to name a list of Floyd's opponents better than Jacobs and Brook?
Gone please name me one win on GGG's resume as good as Floyd vs Cotto at 154. Please do that and I will concede Haz.
P.s you seem to be taking this rather bad. I am just putting my point of view across and it seems many in the boxing world agree with me now. Better late than never I guess.
AdamT- Posts : 6651
Join date : 2014-03-27
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
No-one wants to talk about Floyd mate. He's boring.
When you're holding up a win over a junior welterweight whose record at junior middleweight consisted of wins over Yuri Foreman, Ricardo Mayorga, Delvin Rodriguez and a one-eyed Margarito then you're really stretching. Austin Trout beat Cotto more convincingly than Floyd at 154.
No-one wants to do the GGG vs Floyd debate. I know you're still butt hurt because no-one else (other than your alias) worships Mayweather like you do but lets leave TBE (chortle) out of this one.
Golovkin will be remembered for clearing out a division, in the face of considerable opposition (in terms of no-one wanting to fight him). Will that scrape him a position in the all-time pantheon of middleweights? Probably not. It's a shame the likes of Martinez, Cotto, Alvarez, Sturm etc. wouldn't fight him at his peak. Such a waste.
When you're holding up a win over a junior welterweight whose record at junior middleweight consisted of wins over Yuri Foreman, Ricardo Mayorga, Delvin Rodriguez and a one-eyed Margarito then you're really stretching. Austin Trout beat Cotto more convincingly than Floyd at 154.
No-one wants to do the GGG vs Floyd debate. I know you're still butt hurt because no-one else (other than your alias) worships Mayweather like you do but lets leave TBE (chortle) out of this one.
Golovkin will be remembered for clearing out a division, in the face of considerable opposition (in terms of no-one wanting to fight him). Will that scrape him a position in the all-time pantheon of middleweights? Probably not. It's a shame the likes of Martinez, Cotto, Alvarez, Sturm etc. wouldn't fight him at his peak. Such a waste.
hazharrison- Posts : 7540
Join date : 2011-03-26
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
Ok mate - pointless debating with me then.
hazharrison- Posts : 7540
Join date : 2011-03-26
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
I tell you what, I shouldn't of said you're clueless. It's a childish insult and I take it back.
I don't think GGG is special, you perhaps do. Agree to disagree.
You might not like me as a poster, most don't. But I don't have any problem with you.
I don't think GGG is special, you perhaps do. Agree to disagree.
You might not like me as a poster, most don't. But I don't have any problem with you.
AdamT- Posts : 6651
Join date : 2014-03-27
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
I wonder if Froch's kicking himself for not pursuing the Golovkin fight now that Golovkin is looking a little more human
No question his reputation as the fearless warrior took something of a hit with some fans for not taking up Golovkin's offer
A win over the Kazakh might have propelled Carl above Calzaghe in the super middleweight lists too which no doubt would have been very satisfying for him
No question his reputation as the fearless warrior took something of a hit with some fans for not taking up Golovkin's offer
A win over the Kazakh might have propelled Carl above Calzaghe in the super middleweight lists too which no doubt would have been very satisfying for him
Herman Jaeger- Posts : 3532
Join date : 2011-11-10
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
Froch was too long retired and got dropped badly his second last fight.
Though I would pick him if he was active, probably a smart move.
Though I would pick him if he was active, probably a smart move.
AdamT- Posts : 6651
Join date : 2014-03-27
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
Would have been a great fight for sure maybe one for the annals
Golovkin have the mental edge on him?
I'll be honest I would have made Golovkin the marginal favourite
Golovkin have the mental edge on him?
I'll be honest I would have made Golovkin the marginal favourite
Herman Jaeger- Posts : 3532
Join date : 2011-11-10
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
I honestly don't think boxers are too concerned where they appear in fan lists.
Hammersmith harrier- Posts : 12060
Join date : 2013-09-26
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
Hammersmith harrier wrote:I honestly don't think boxers are too concerned where they appear in fan lists.
lol
Herman Jaeger- Posts : 3532
Join date : 2011-11-10
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
Hammersmith harrier wrote:I honestly don't think boxers are too concerned where they appear in fan lists.
Seems to me like some boxers are obsessed with what people think of them
It means more to them than money in most cases
Very vain people boxers..
Herman Jaeger- Posts : 3532
Join date : 2011-11-10
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
Of course it does Herman of course it does.
Hammersmith harrier- Posts : 12060
Join date : 2013-09-26
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
Unbelievably vain people a lot of boxers...
Herman Jaeger- Posts : 3532
Join date : 2011-11-10
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
hazharrison wrote:No-one wants to talk about Floyd mate. He's boring.
When you're holding up a win over a junior welterweight whose record at junior middleweight consisted of wins over Yuri Foreman, Ricardo Mayorga, Delvin Rodriguez and a one-eyed Margarito then you're really stretching. Austin Trout beat Cotto more convincingly than Floyd at 154.
No-one wants to do the GGG vs Floyd debate. I know you're still butt hurt because no-one else (other than your alias) worships Mayweather like you do but lets leave TBE (chortle) out of this one.
Golovkin will be remembered for clearing out a division, in the face of considerable opposition (in terms of no-one wanting to fight him). Will that scrape him a position in the all-time pantheon of middleweights? Probably not. It's a shame the likes of Martinez, Cotto, Alvarez, Sturm etc. wouldn't fight him at his peak. Such a waste.
Manny did a better job on cotto than Floyd. That said calling cotto a junior welter is like calling Floyd a super feather/lightweight. Cotto struggled making weight at 140, and whatever a 'natural' weight is these days, his would be above floyds.
The big shame Re ggg is the injury to pirog in the run up to their fight... a guy who actually chose to fight golovkin He'd have got his big test in early. Pirog was a bit hot and cold but he looked tasty in the jacobs fight even before the ko.
Martinez cotto sturm were all past their peaks when the fights were viable. Not saying that's an excuse to not fight him, just that GGG's timing hasn't been great.
milkyboy- Posts : 7762
Join date : 2011-05-22
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
GGG v Jacobs 114 - 113..
35...Should have fought the best earlier....He can forget 168..
Take all the "crap" you want..I did...But your tank and reflexes will diminish at 35....Nothing can help that.....Floyd and Hoppo had great defences.
This guy is too easy to hit.....The GGG that beat Macklin beats Jacobs easier.
That one has gone.
35...Should have fought the best earlier....He can forget 168..
Take all the "crap" you want..I did...But your tank and reflexes will diminish at 35....Nothing can help that.....Floyd and Hoppo had great defences.
This guy is too easy to hit.....The GGG that beat Macklin beats Jacobs easier.
That one has gone.
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40690
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
Golovkin might benefit from a less busy schedule at his age. Hes looked a bit mentally and physically disengaged in his last couple of fights. Less of a spark and enthusiasm about him. He has a pretty busy schedule and he always seems in fighting shape all year round so he must be grinding in the gym constantly. They like to keep him busy and keep him in training but maybe at his age it will start causing a bit of burnout.
catchweight- Posts : 4339
Join date : 2013-09-18
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
I scored it for GGG, but seems loads thought Jacobs won. I watched the fight after knowing the result.
Jacobs definitely deserves another crack soon. But I think it will be Canelo.
Jacobs definitely deserves another crack soon. But I think it will be Canelo.
AdamT- Posts : 6651
Join date : 2014-03-27
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
Would have to say the overwhelming majority of boxing fans I've seen scored it for ggg
BoxingFan88- Posts : 3759
Join date : 2011-02-20
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
Two decent fighters, nothing special. Hope Mw gets quality again.
AdamT- Posts : 6651
Join date : 2014-03-27
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
milkyboy wrote:hazharrison wrote:No-one wants to talk about Floyd mate. He's boring.
When you're holding up a win over a junior welterweight whose record at junior middleweight consisted of wins over Yuri Foreman, Ricardo Mayorga, Delvin Rodriguez and a one-eyed Margarito then you're really stretching. Austin Trout beat Cotto more convincingly than Floyd at 154.
No-one wants to do the GGG vs Floyd debate. I know you're still butt hurt because no-one else (other than your alias) worships Mayweather like you do but lets leave TBE (chortle) out of this one.
Golovkin will be remembered for clearing out a division, in the face of considerable opposition (in terms of no-one wanting to fight him). Will that scrape him a position in the all-time pantheon of middleweights? Probably not. It's a shame the likes of Martinez, Cotto, Alvarez, Sturm etc. wouldn't fight him at his peak. Such a waste.
Manny did a better job on cotto than Floyd. That said calling cotto a junior welter is like calling Floyd a super feather/lightweight. Cotto struggled making weight at 140, and whatever a 'natural' weight is these days, his would be above floyds.
The big shame Re ggg is the injury to pirog in the run up to their fight... a guy who actually chose to fight golovkin He'd have got his big test in early. Pirog was a bit hot and cold but he looked tasty in the jacobs fight even before the ko.
Martinez cotto sturm were all past their peaks when the fights were viable. Not saying that's an excuse to not fight him, just that GGG's timing hasn't been great.
Manny did indeed beat Cotto better - but he was in his Ariza dodgy 'shakes purple patch (Roach's words, not mine). He was a monster against Cotto. It's no coincidence he split with Ariza and stopped knocking the living daylights out of fighters (to my mind at least).
Canelo was slap bang in the middle of his prime; Martinez was in the midst of his middleweight championship run. Sturm was a world title holder! Never has a fighter been swerved as badly as Golovkin. Over the last 40 years I can think of Jones, Rigondeaux and maybe Winky Wright off the top of my head. None were as avoided as GGG. Shame those years were wasted and he looks like he dun slid (to coin an Ali-ism).
hazharrison- Posts : 7540
Join date : 2011-03-26
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
hazharrison wrote:milkyboy wrote:hazharrison wrote:No-one wants to talk about Floyd mate. He's boring.
When you're holding up a win over a junior welterweight whose record at junior middleweight consisted of wins over Yuri Foreman, Ricardo Mayorga, Delvin Rodriguez and a one-eyed Margarito then you're really stretching. Austin Trout beat Cotto more convincingly than Floyd at 154.
No-one wants to do the GGG vs Floyd debate. I know you're still butt hurt because no-one else (other than your alias) worships Mayweather like you do but lets leave TBE (chortle) out of this one.
Golovkin will be remembered for clearing out a division, in the face of considerable opposition (in terms of no-one wanting to fight him). Will that scrape him a position in the all-time pantheon of middleweights? Probably not. It's a shame the likes of Martinez, Cotto, Alvarez, Sturm etc. wouldn't fight him at his peak. Such a waste.
Manny did a better job on cotto than Floyd. That said calling cotto a junior welter is like calling Floyd a super feather/lightweight. Cotto struggled making weight at 140, and whatever a 'natural' weight is these days, his would be above floyds.
The big shame Re ggg is the injury to pirog in the run up to their fight... a guy who actually chose to fight golovkin He'd have got his big test in early. Pirog was a bit hot and cold but he looked tasty in the jacobs fight even before the ko.
Martinez cotto sturm were all past their peaks when the fights were viable. Not saying that's an excuse to not fight him, just that GGG's timing hasn't been great.
Manny did indeed beat Cotto better - but he was in his Ariza dodgy 'shakes purple patch (Roach's words, not mine). He was a monster against Cotto. It's no coincidence he split with Ariza and stopped knocking the living daylights out of fighters (to my mind at least).
Canelo was slap bang in the middle of his prime; Martinez was in the midst of his middleweight championship run. Sturm was a world title holder! Never has a fighter been swerved as badly as Golovkin. Over the last 40 years I can think of Jones, Rigondeaux and maybe Winky Wright off the top of my head. None were as avoided as GGG. Shame those years were wasted and he looks like he dun slid (to coin an Ali-ism).
It's a pity he was avoided. least if he hadn't of been, I wouldn't have to listen to the bullsh1t hype that surrounds him. He isn't that good, so someone would probably beat him. Pity Cotto wasn't a natural 160 fighter. I think he would beat GGG if he was.
AdamT- Posts : 6651
Join date : 2014-03-27
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
Come now Adam, he would have beaten all the fighters that avoided him surely
Of all the fighters that avoided him, I can't think of a single one who you would have made favourite to beat him
That said he HAS ruled a very weak division
Of all the fighters that avoided him, I can't think of a single one who you would have made favourite to beat him
That said he HAS ruled a very weak division
Herman Jaeger- Posts : 3532
Join date : 2011-11-10
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
And the guys who avoided him wouldn't have added much to his legacy either imo
Very weak division
Very weak division
Herman Jaeger- Posts : 3532
Join date : 2011-11-10
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
Froch and Ward have both been accused of ducking him and I'd have made both reasonable favourites to win.
Hammersmith harrier- Posts : 12060
Join date : 2013-09-26
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
I actually think Froch would stop him
Yes I know he has never been stopped as 300 plus amateur. I also don't care. In a professional 12 round fight, I think Froch would wear him down and stop him.
Ward wins a unanimous decision. Possibly boring, but quite one sided.
GGG is a very good fighter, but he lacks something. Great front runner though.
Yes I know he has never been stopped as 300 plus amateur. I also don't care. In a professional 12 round fight, I think Froch would wear him down and stop him.
Ward wins a unanimous decision. Possibly boring, but quite one sided.
GGG is a very good fighter, but he lacks something. Great front runner though.
AdamT- Posts : 6651
Join date : 2014-03-27
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
Golovkin favourite over a post Groves 1 Froch surely
Maybe Ward favourite to beat him but Ward not a natural middleweight
At a catchweight of 164 you'd have to give Golovkin a great shot to beat Ward surely
Maybe Ward favourite to beat him but Ward not a natural middleweight
At a catchweight of 164 you'd have to give Golovkin a great shot to beat Ward surely
Herman Jaeger- Posts : 3532
Join date : 2011-11-10
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
GGG can hardly beat Jacobs, he wouldn't beat Ward
AdamT- Posts : 6651
Join date : 2014-03-27
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
The fight would have to be at 168lbs a weight he said he'd fight anyone at but he and his team knew his only chance of victory was trying to drain Ward to a standstill.
Hammersmith harrier- Posts : 12060
Join date : 2013-09-26
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
AdamT wrote:I actually think Froch would stop him
Yes I know he has never been stopped as 300 plus amateur. I also don't care. In a professional 12 round fight, I think Froch would wear him down and stop him.
Ward wins a unanimous decision. Possibly boring, but quite one sided.
GGG is a very good fighter, but he lacks something. Great front runner though.
Just because Jacobs can beat(or nearly) Golovkin doesn't mean Froch could surely
Two totally different styles
It's movers we're now surmising that might be able to trouble the Kazakh surely he beats anyone at the axis who comes to fight
Then again maybe Froch could do a hit and run job on him ala Abraham but Golovkin cuts the ring off better than Artur and Froch surely isn't as good a boxer as Jacobs(even though Jacobs isn't that good himself)
Herman Jaeger- Posts : 3532
Join date : 2011-11-10
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
I don't think he looked that good against Brook. GGG gets hit while easy. He's just lucky not many 160 fighters are that great.
I will not be brain washed to think GGG is anything special. He isn't. Like Wlad at heavyweight, he is ruling at an easy time. Wlad has probably fought better opponents.
I will not be brain washed to think GGG is anything special. He isn't. Like Wlad at heavyweight, he is ruling at an easy time. Wlad has probably fought better opponents.
AdamT- Posts : 6651
Join date : 2014-03-27
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
Hammersmith harrier wrote:The fight would have to be at 168lbs a weight he said he'd fight anyone at but he and his team knew his only chance of victory was trying to drain Ward to a standstill.
I think Ward might be too clever and too big for Golovkin the Kazakh looked horribly one dimensional against Jacobs but why did Ward request a tuneup fight to face Golovkin? Hardly exuding confidence that
Herman Jaeger- Posts : 3532
Join date : 2011-11-10
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
Hammersmith harrier wrote:Surely, surely, surely
Surely you're a sarcastic pr1ck
Herman Jaeger- Posts : 3532
Join date : 2011-11-10
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
Herman Jaeger wrote:Hammersmith harrier wrote:The fight would have to be at 168lbs a weight he said he'd fight anyone at but he and his team knew his only chance of victory was trying to drain Ward to a standstill.
I think Ward might be too clever and too big for Golovkin the Kazakh looked horribly one dimensional against Jacobs but why did Ward request a tuneup fight to face Golovkin? Hardly exuding confidence that
He was returning from injury, it hardly exudes confidence that GGG won't move up at all yet we're to believe he beats a great 168lber and a very very good one. Ward and Froch have proven their worth multiple times against the very best their divisions had to offer.
Hammersmith harrier- Posts : 12060
Join date : 2013-09-26
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
We were just having a nice debate and you had to be your usual sarcastic self
Herman Jaeger- Posts : 3532
Join date : 2011-11-10
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
How is that sarcastic, it's not my fault you can't quantify your statements.
Hammersmith harrier- Posts : 12060
Join date : 2013-09-26
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
You don't like it when people disagree with you
Herman Jaeger- Posts : 3532
Join date : 2011-11-10
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
Disagree all you want but at least try and back up what you're saying, it's odd how much you moan considering it's you who goes off on one all the time.
Hammersmith harrier- Posts : 12060
Join date : 2013-09-26
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
Double standards is rife on these boards...
GGG may have had an off night...Now Roman can show how great he is etc..
Yet the greatest Ward ever seemed to have fought Kovo and robbed him and Maidana shows Floyd isn't a Top Atg...
Black and white on here.
GGG may have had an off night...Now Roman can show how great he is etc..
Yet the greatest Ward ever seemed to have fought Kovo and robbed him and Maidana shows Floyd isn't a Top Atg...
Black and white on here.
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40690
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
Ward's hurrying to sign the contract for the rematch isn't he?
Geez how much longer...
Geez how much longer...
Herman Jaeger- Posts : 3532
Join date : 2011-11-10
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
Herman Jaeger wrote:Ward's hurrying to sign the contract for the rematch isn't he?
Geez how much longer...
He can retire now and he'll have had the career GGG and Kovo can only dream of.
If only he had your bollox Herman.
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40690
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
Erm hasn't it been stated that both Kov's and Ward's teams are 'negotiating' at this time Herman. You can't pin all the blame on one fighter just cause you don't like him (I'm not a Ward nor Floyd fan but you can't argue against how good they are)
As for GGG, he's a good talent in what everyone states is a mediocre division, whilst I can't argue that he may want to unify the division if he (and his fans) want to be recognised as a great then you really have to sign on to fight the greater fighters and if they ain't in your division then your going to have to move to fulfil a legacy.
As for GGG, he's a good talent in what everyone states is a mediocre division, whilst I can't argue that he may want to unify the division if he (and his fans) want to be recognised as a great then you really have to sign on to fight the greater fighters and if they ain't in your division then your going to have to move to fulfil a legacy.
Derbymanc- Posts : 4008
Join date : 2013-10-14
Location : Manchester
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
TRUSSMAN66 wrote:Herman Jaeger wrote:Ward's hurrying to sign the contract for the rematch isn't he?
Geez how much longer...
He can retire now and he'll have had the career GGG and Kovo can only dream of.
If only he had your bollox Herman.
If Ward retired now that would pee off a lot of fans who would see it as a cowardly move.
But you'd be happy with it, right?
Herman Jaeger- Posts : 3532
Join date : 2011-11-10
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
The resume of a coward is as follows;
Kessler, Abraham, Green, Froch, Bika, Dawson, Rodriguez and Kovalev.
Imagine if he grew a pair.
Kessler, Abraham, Green, Froch, Bika, Dawson, Rodriguez and Kovalev.
Imagine if he grew a pair.
Hammersmith harrier- Posts : 12060
Join date : 2013-09-26
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
It's looking a bit once bitten twice shy at the minute with this delay
Herman Jaeger- Posts : 3532
Join date : 2011-11-10
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
what delay, cause Kov doesn't want his ears boxed off again so he's told his team to drag it out as much as possible hoping Ward goes off elsewhere
Derbymanc- Posts : 4008
Join date : 2013-10-14
Location : Manchester
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
The only person not signing is Ward
Herman Jaeger- Posts : 3532
Join date : 2011-11-10
Re: Golovkin v Jacobs
Can you post us a link to where Kov's signed as i've only seen stuff saying neither have signed with Kov demanding he chooses where it's at.
Truss - The world must have changed, who would have thought i'd stick up for ward :-)
Truss - The world must have changed, who would have thought i'd stick up for ward :-)
Derbymanc- Posts : 4008
Join date : 2013-10-14
Location : Manchester
Page 4 of 7 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Similar topics
» Golovkin vs Jacobs CONFIRMED
» Jacobs - Eubank jr?
» GGG vs Jacobs ppv buys
» Canelo-Jacobs - predictions.
» Danny Jacobs' comeback
» Jacobs - Eubank jr?
» GGG vs Jacobs ppv buys
» Canelo-Jacobs - predictions.
» Danny Jacobs' comeback
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 4 of 7
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum