Music Section Morning Tea Society

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

superflyweight wrote:

I never ratified Duty's membership on the grounds that he's a w*nking w*nk.  

Do you get a veto like the UN security council then?

Only on grounds of whether or not someone is a frequent self-abuser.

superflyweight wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

superflyweight wrote:

I never ratified Duty's membership on the grounds that he's a w*nking w*nk.  

Do you get a veto like the UN security council then?

Only on grounds of whether or not someone is a frequent self-abuser.

Congrats on the thread split supes.

Non-abusive fist.

Congrats on the split, Super.

I take it you're following the discussions on the politics thread? A damn good read and thoroughly entertaining as well.

Pal Joey wrote:Non-abusive fist.

Congrats on the split, Super.

I take it you're following the discussions on the politics thread? A damn good read and thoroughly entertaining as well.

Although I find Duty and Julius's argument to be impressively worded, they steer clear of the important matters you find on the golf boards, like Prince Andrew's guilt and the size of Tiger Woods's c*ck.

Galted wrote:

Pal Joey wrote:Non-abusive fist.

Congrats on the split, Super.

I take it you're following the discussions on the politics thread? A damn good read and thoroughly entertaining as well.

Although I find Duty and Julius's argument to be impressively worded, they steer clear of the important matters you find on the golf boards, like Prince Andrew's guilt and the size of Tiger Woods's c*ck.

Both are massive.

JuliusHMarx wrote:

Galted wrote:

Pal Joey wrote:Non-abusive fist.

Congrats on the split, Super.

I take it you're following the discussions on the politics thread? A damn good read and thoroughly entertaining as well.

Although I find Duty and Julius's argument to be impressively worded, they steer clear of the important matters you find on the golf boards, like Prince Andrew's guilt and the size of Tiger Woods's c*ck.

Both are massive.

Mines massive and it ain't made of plastic.

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

JuliusHMarx wrote:

Galted wrote:

Pal Joey wrote:Non-abusive fist.

Congrats on the split, Super.

I take it you're following the discussions on the politics thread? A damn good read and thoroughly entertaining as well.

Although I find Duty and Julius's argument to be impressively worded, they steer clear of the important matters you find on the golf boards, like Prince Andrew's guilt and the size of Tiger Woods's c*ck.

Both are massive.

Mines massive and it ain't made of plastic.

Oooh, you're hard.

Galted wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

JuliusHMarx wrote:

Galted wrote:

Pal Joey wrote:Non-abusive fist.

Congrats on the split, Super.

I take it you're following the discussions on the politics thread? A damn good read and thoroughly entertaining as well.

Although I find Duty and Julius's argument to be impressively worded, they steer clear of the important matters you find on the golf boards, like Prince Andrew's guilt and the size of Tiger Woods's c*ck.

Both are massive.

Mines massive and it ain't made of plastic.

Oooh, you're hard.

Yeah, against karate?

Morning, has anyone got a synopsis of recent MSMTS activity?

Or should I just head to the politics thread to see how financial and DP reform is getting on?

rIck_dAgless wrote:Morning, has anyone got a synopsis of recent MSMTS activity?

Or should I just head to the politics thread to see how financial and DP reform is getting on?

Head to the politics thread for all your budget/fiscal needs. Head to the g*lf thread for nonce related stories or whatever else is on navytrainingpants clipboard and head to the boxing thread to see Beefcake's 800th iteration of any multitude of threads he posted over the last decade.

I thought he flounced off the boxing, and all other boards a while back?

Stay here for all plastic c0ck related content.

Well that's me all caught up, nice one chaps.

I'm not DART.

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:I'm not DART.

Imagine, if in those last few seconds, the on-board camera captured a settlement of peaceful Dimorphousans peacefully going about their daily lives.

Pal Joey wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:I'm not DART.

Imagine, if in those last few seconds, the on-board camera captured a settlement of peaceful Dimorphousans peacefully going about their daily lives.

Well it would be perfectly in keeping with humanities rampant desire to destroy things.

Too deep for a Tuesday morning? Could talk about norks and Galted getting noshed off by a tramp if we want to raise the standard of discussion?

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Pal Joey wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:I'm not DART.

Imagine, if in those last few seconds, the on-board camera captured a settlement of peaceful Dimorphousans peacefully going about their daily lives.

Well it would be perfectly in keeping with humanities rampant desire to destroy things.

Too deep for a Tuesday morning? Could talk about norks and Galted getting noshed off by a tramp if we want to raise the standard of discussion?

Sure. Or Giorgia Melonia's melons.

Pal Joey wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Pal Joey wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:I'm not DART.

Imagine, if in those last few seconds, the on-board camera captured a settlement of peaceful Dimorphousans peacefully going about their daily lives.

Well it would be perfectly in keeping with humanities rampant desire to destroy things.

Too deep for a Tuesday morning? Could talk about norks and Galted getting noshed off by a tramp if we want to raise the standard of discussion?

Sure. Or Giorgia Melonia's melons.

Haven't really studied them in any depth but will go away and do some research.

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Pal Joey wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Pal Joey wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:I'm not DART.

Imagine, if in those last few seconds, the on-board camera captured a settlement of peaceful Dimorphousans peacefully going about their daily lives.

Well it would be perfectly in keeping with humanities rampant desire to destroy things.

Too deep for a Tuesday morning? Could talk about norks and Galted getting noshed off by a tramp if we want to raise the standard of discussion?

Sure. Or Giorgia Melonia's melons.

Haven't really studied them in any depth but will go away and do some research.

You'll probably find the pictures of her holding up a couple of them. Nothing too shocking but maybe it's some sort of play on her own name?

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Pal Joey wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:I'm not DART.

Imagine, if in those last few seconds, the on-board camera captured a settlement of peaceful Dimorphousans peacefully going about their daily lives.

Well it would be perfectly in keeping with humanities rampant desire to destroy things.

Too deep for a Tuesday morning? Could talk about norks and Galted getting noshed off by a tramp if we want to raise the standard of discussion?

Rachel Weisz is not a tramp.

Galted wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Pal Joey wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:I'm not DART.

Imagine, if in those last few seconds, the on-board camera captured a settlement of peaceful Dimorphousans peacefully going about their daily lives.

Well it would be perfectly in keeping with humanities rampant desire to destroy things.

Too deep for a Tuesday morning? Could talk about norks and Galted getting noshed off by a tramp if we want to raise the standard of discussion?

Rachel Weisz is not a tramp.

Correct, she isn't.

Active on here this morning.

I'm utterly shocked that Duty hasn't responded to me on the Politics thread when I asked him for specific financial services regulations that he'd like to get rid of. What do they teach kids in A-Level Law classes these days?

superflyweight wrote:Active on here this morning.

I'm utterly shocked that Duty hasn't responded to me on the Politics thread when I asked him for specific financial services regulations that he'd like to get rid of.  What do they teach kids in A-Level Law classes these days?

We're not still pretending he is a 'kid' are we? At least a decade older than he claims. Probably closer to our age.

superflyweight wrote:Active on here this morning.

I'm utterly shocked that Duty hasn't responded to me on the Politics thread when I asked him for specific financial services regulations that he'd like to get rid of.  What do they teach kids in A-Level Law classes these days?

Dunno about you but I was actively advised to stay away from A level Law as it starts you off with the wrong methodology. This is more like the accountants who did a tax law elective and think they can throw down in the moot hall.

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

superflyweight wrote:Active on here this morning.

I'm utterly shocked that Duty hasn't responded to me on the Politics thread when I asked him for specific financial services regulations that he'd like to get rid of.  What do they teach kids in A-Level Law classes these days?

We're not still pretending he is a 'kid' are we? At least a decade older than he claims. Probably closer to our age.

Well I did turn 27 recently, so I wouldn't say I'm a 'kid'.

superflyweight wrote:Active on here this morning.

I'm utterly shocked that Duty hasn't responded to me on the Politics thread when I asked him for specific financial services regulations that he'd like to get rid of.  What do they teach kids in A-Level Law classes these days?

Duty281 wrote:
According to official data, the UK has retained 2,417 pieces of EU law since leaving the bloc.

Only 182 of these laws have been amended, 196 have been appealed and 33 have been replaced.

Good. A proper break with the EU. This is the exact stuff Johnson should have been doing.

Yeah, it's quite a big bone he's decided to chew on. He's probably still doing research into the remaining 2006 pieces of EU legislation that haven't either been amended, appealed, repealed or replaced.

I suspect it could take a lot of time to determine which ones should stay and which ones should go... and the reasons why. That's a huge task, isn't it?
Still, I eagerly await his response like you, Superfly.

rIck_dAgless wrote:

superflyweight wrote:Active on here this morning.

I'm utterly shocked that Duty hasn't responded to me on the Politics thread when I asked him for specific financial services regulations that he'd like to get rid of.  What do they teach kids in A-Level Law classes these days?

Dunno about you but I was actively advised to stay away from A level Law as it starts you off with the wrong methodology.  This is more like the accountants who did a tax law elective and think they can throw down in the moot hall.

I always just assumed it was like the Legal Methods & Systems class we got in the first term of first year.

Pal Joey wrote:

superflyweight wrote:Active on here this morning.

I'm utterly shocked that Duty hasn't responded to me on the Politics thread when I asked him for specific financial services regulations that he'd like to get rid of.  What do they teach kids in A-Level Law classes these days?

Duty281 wrote:
According to official data, the UK has retained 2,417 pieces of EU law since leaving the bloc.

Only 182 of these laws have been amended, 196 have been appealed and 33 have been replaced.

Good. A proper break with the EU. This is the exact stuff Johnson should have been doing.

Yeah, it's quite a big bone he's decided to chew on. He's probably still doing research into the remaining 2006 pieces of EU legislation that haven't either been amended, appealed, repealed or replaced.

I suspect it could take a lot of time to determine which ones should stay and which ones should go... and the reasons why. That's a huge task, isn't it?
Still, I eagerly await his response like you, Superfly.

I just get annoyed at people claiming that we need to get rid of regulations when they don't have the first clue about the actual content of those regulations and how little they impact upon an organisation's ability to make money.

At risk of getting too serious on here so will finish this post by shouting "BIG FANNIES".

Supes and I also asked Cuty which bits of GDPR he'd like to see reformed so he's probably also reading up on that as well, which can take a while if you're starting point is only knowing what the letters stand for.

JuliusHMarx wrote:Supes and I also asked Cuty which bits of GDPR he'd like to see reformed so he's probably also reading up on that as well, which can take a while if you're starting point is only knowing what the letters stand for.

Your queries went unanswered because I sensed, correctly it seems, that you weren't interested in the answer and only interested in taking the mick.

I extensively researched existing EU regulations/laws as part of a role I had with the Civil Service a few years ago, so I'm perfectly cognisant of what I'm talking about, even if I choose not to share it with you on this occasion.

JuliusHMarx wrote:Supes and I also asked Cuty which bits of GDPR he'd like to see reformed so he's probably also reading up on that as well, which can take a while if you're starting point is only knowing what the letters stand for.

German Democratic People's Republic?

Only kidding. We've just had a major telcom security breach here. Only 10 million people are affected.
Luckily I'm with the other lot but I think I'll go back to the 2-step authentication even though it's a bit annoying. Better to be protected though, right?
Just did a check before. Phone and 2 email accounts are OK. 2 other emails aren't. 2 and 5 hacks respectively for those ones which I don't use so much and have been around for more than 15 years or more.

Duty281 wrote:

JuliusHMarx wrote:Supes and I also asked Cuty which bits of GDPR he'd like to see reformed so he's probably also reading up on that as well, which can take a while if you're starting point is only knowing what the letters stand for.

Your queries went unanswered because I sensed, correctly it seems, that you weren't interested in the answer and only interested in taking the mick.

I extensively researched existing EU regulations/laws as part of a role I had with the Civil Service a few years ago, so I'm perfectly cognisant of what I'm talking about, even if I choose not to share it with you on this occasion.

You wouldn't know my girlfriend - she goes to a different school.

Duty281 wrote:

JuliusHMarx wrote:Supes and I also asked Cuty which bits of GDPR he'd like to see reformed so he's probably also reading up on that as well, which can take a while if you're starting point is only knowing what the letters stand for.

Your queries went unanswered because I sensed, correctly it seems, that you weren't interested in the answer and only interested in taking the mick.

I extensively researched existing EU regulations/laws as part of a role I had with the Civil Service a few years ago, so I'm perfectly cognisant of what I'm talking about, even if I choose not to share it with you on this occasion.

To be fair, you're correct in your assessment that we don't really care what someone like you thinks.

JuliusHMarx wrote:

Duty281 wrote:

JuliusHMarx wrote:Supes and I also asked Cuty which bits of GDPR he'd like to see reformed so he's probably also reading up on that as well, which can take a while if you're starting point is only knowing what the letters stand for.

Your queries went unanswered because I sensed, correctly it seems, that you weren't interested in the answer and only interested in taking the mick.

I extensively researched existing EU regulations/laws as part of a role I had with the Civil Service a few years ago, so I'm perfectly cognisant of what I'm talking about, even if I choose not to share it with you on this occasion.

To be fair, you're correct in your assessment that we don't really care what someone like you thinks.

That's a disappointing comment, albeit not entirely surprising.

Who do you reckon would win a duel with Duty facing off against Super and Jules, if Duty had a Glock and Super and Jules had muskets?

Galted wrote:Who do you reckon would win a duel with Duty facing off against Super and Jules, if Duty had a Glock and Super and Jules had muskets?

Could I make a request for a magnum and Tino's support?

Duty281 wrote:

Galted wrote:Who do you reckon would win a duel with Duty facing off against Super and Jules, if Duty had a Glock and Super and Jules had muskets?

Could I make a request for a magnum and Tino's support?

I'd just pick up Tina and hit you with him.

Ok, Duty with a Magnum against Julius with a musket and Super with a snooker ball in a sock?

superflyweight wrote:

Duty281 wrote:

Galted wrote:Who do you reckon would win a duel with Duty facing off against Super and Jules, if Duty had a Glock and Super and Jules had muskets?

Could I make a request for a magnum and Tino's support?

I'd just pick up Tina and hit you with him.  

Few years and lbs ago maybe.

Duty281 wrote:

Galted wrote:Who do you reckon would win a duel with Duty facing off against Super and Jules, if Duty had a Glock and Super and Jules had muskets?

Could I make a request for a magnum and Tino's support?

Would you go for a classic or mint?

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Duty281 wrote:

Galted wrote:Who do you reckon would win a duel with Duty facing off against Super and Jules, if Duty had a Glock and Super and Jules had muskets?

Could I make a request for a magnum and Tino's support?

Would you go for a classic or mint?

The white chocolate one is far superior, might be almond.

superflyweight wrote:

Duty281 wrote:

Galted wrote:Who do you reckon would win a duel with Duty facing off against Super and Jules, if Duty had a Glock and Super and Jules had muskets?

Could I make a request for a magnum and Tino's support?

I'd just pick up Tina and hit you with him.  

So a bit like the DART versus Dimorphos technique, yeah?
Let's just hope they aren't standing too close to Galted... or as we know him, Didymos.

Galted wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Duty281 wrote:

Galted wrote:Who do you reckon would win a duel with Duty facing off against Super and Jules, if Duty had a Glock and Super and Jules had muskets?

Could I make a request for a magnum and Tino's support?

Would you go for a classic or mint?

The white chocolate one is far superior, might be almond.

Marc your words.

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Galted wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Duty281 wrote:

Galted wrote:Who do you reckon would win a duel with Duty facing off against Super and Jules, if Duty had a Glock and Super and Jules had muskets?

Could I make a request for a magnum and Tino's support?

Would you go for a classic or mint?

The white chocolate one is far superior, might be almond.

Marc your words.

Lovely work.

Back on topic - the Salted Caramel one is better than sex. At least, that's what Mrs Superfly said.

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Galted wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Duty281 wrote:

Galted wrote:Who do you reckon would win a duel with Duty facing off against Super and Jules, if Duty had a Glock and Super and Jules had muskets?

Could I make a request for a magnum and Tino's support?

Would you go for a classic or mint?

The white chocolate one is far superior, might be almond.

Marc your words.

They make my tongue sting.

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Duty281 wrote:

Galted wrote:Who do you reckon would win a duel with Duty facing off against Super and Jules, if Duty had a Glock and Super and Jules had muskets?

Could I make a request for a magnum and Tino's support?

Would you go for a classic or mint?

I'd go for the 44(0ml). The sweet and salty almond remix tub.

Controversial michaelsing from Duty.

Superfly used his veto on membership (although going straight to the w*nking w*nk clause was a little excessive I thought) so does Doot's post class as a michaelsing or is Galted's strange 'stinging tongue' effort the culprit.

Exciting times for the Tea Society.

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:Controversial michaelsing from Duty.

Superfly used his veto on membership (although going straight to the w*nking w*nk clause was a little excessive I thought) so does Doot's post class as a michaelsing or is Galted's strange 'stinging tongue' effort the culprit.

Exciting times for the Tea Society.

Sting was my response to your Marc Almond, thought it was a good stepping stone to an afternoon of puns but turns out it was more of a bananarama peel.

Galted wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:Controversial michaelsing from Duty.

Superfly used his veto on membership (although going straight to the w*nking w*nk clause was a little excessive I thought) so does Doot's post class as a michaelsing or is Galted's strange 'stinging tongue' effort the culprit.

Exciting times for the Tea Society.

Sting was my response to your Marc Almond, thought it was a good stepping stone to an afternoon of puns but turns out it was more of a bananarama peel.

Don't talk to me about puns. 'The Mantel has passed' went completely unnoticed.

JuliusHMarx wrote:

Galted wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:Controversial michaelsing from Duty.

Superfly used his veto on membership (although going straight to the w*nking w*nk clause was a little excessive I thought) so does Doot's post class as a michaelsing or is Galted's strange 'stinging tongue' effort the culprit.

Exciting times for the Tea Society.

Sting was my response to your Marc Almond, thought it was a good stepping stone to an afternoon of puns but turns out it was more of a bananarama peel.

Don't talk to me about puns. 'The Mantel has passed' went completely unnoticed.

That's Hilaryious.