Reverse Linear Quick Draw Predictions? - Cancelled

Here's an idea.

I name a fight from times gone by, you reverse predict (remember) the winner, method of victory and round of victory.

First one to give the correct answer gets a point.

Off we go...

Marciano v Walcott II

walcott wins on points 15 rounds?

Not far off...

Sod this, its less popular than "Controversial decisions revisited, volume one. De la Hoya-Whitaker, 1997", and that's saying something.

I dont think anyone has got any idea what you are talking about union. I certainly dont.

Shhhh!

Just let this one fall gracefully down the front page and off into oblivion.

I don't know what I was thinking.

I don't even think that I was thinking.

Union Cane wrote:Shhhh!

Just let this one fall gracefully down the front page and off into oblivion.

I don't know what I was thinking.

I don't even think that I was thinking.

Union as you know nobody supports the reverse linear thing more than me but even I have to say you may have over reached on this one

You could be right.

Now, say no more, and let it die quietly.

Union Cane wrote:You could be right.

Now, say no more, and let it die quietly.

Not a problem

Me too. I won't mention this thread again.

Think if we all agree to do that Sean should disappear soon enough

I could always say a rude word and get the thread locked I suppose....

Is it dead yet..? I think I understand it.

BALTIMORA wrote:Is it dead yet..? I think I understand it.

Could you explain it to me then please?

Be quick though...

Bum!

Union

Stay off the special powder.

Ta

Coxy

Look lads Union has asked nicely that we don't post on this thread to let it die a dignified death, he is a well liked and respected poster, the least we could do is respect his wishes.

rowley wrote:Look lads Union has asked nicely that we don't post on this thread to let it die a dignified death, he is a well liked and respected poster, the least we could do is respect his wishes.

here here.

Union Cane wrote:

BALTIMORA wrote:Is it dead yet..? I think I understand it.

Could you explain it to me then please?

Be quick though...

Bum!

You name a fight. We state the specific result of said fight. Points are awarded.

No?

or should it be hear hear?????

BALTIMORA wrote:

Union Cane wrote:

BALTIMORA wrote:Is it dead yet..? I think I understand it.

Could you explain it to me then please?

Be quick though...

Bum!

You name a fight. We state the specific result of said fight. Points are awarded.

No?

That was the original idea, but it didn't work.

What about the reverse aspect? How can you reverse predict a round of victory? Whats the reverse of KO RD 3?

Just let it die like everyone else is Balti.

Hear, hear is an expression used as a short, repeated form of hear him, hear him. It represents a listener's agreement with the point being made by a speaker. It is often incorrectly spelled "here here".[1]

It was originally an imperative for directing attention to speakers, and has since been used, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, as "the regular form of cheering in the House of Commons", with many purposes depending on the intonation of its user.[2] Its use in Parliament is linked to the fact that applause is normally (though not always) forbidden in the chambers of the House of Commons and House of Lords.[3]

The phrase hear him, hear him! was used in Parliament from late in the 17th century, and was reduced to hear! or hear, hear! by the late 18th century. The verb hear had earlier been used in the King James Bible as a command for others to listen

Other phrases have been derived from hear, hear, such as a hear, hear (a cheer), to hear-hear (to shout the expression), and hear-hearer (a person who does the same).

Sean if hear hear is good enough for Wikipedia it is good enough for me

joeyjojo618 wrote:What about the reverse aspect? How can you reverse predict a round of victory? Whats the reverse of KO RD 3?

Just let it die like everyone else is Balti.

I tried...I really tried. Breaks my heart losing one like this. Someone better notify the next of kin.

joeyjojo618 wrote:What about the reverse aspect? How can you reverse predict a round of victory?

The reverse prediction refers to the fact that the fight has already happened, so it's not a prediction at all.

One of the highlights of my week is nipping out to the car at lunch and listening to PM's Questions on 5 live. They're mental! I actually know (from a former conservative MP) that a lot of them are leathered before going in.

Michaels, Sean wrote:One of the highlights of my week is nipping out to the car at lunch and listening to PM's Questions on 5 live. They're mental! I actually know (from a former conservative MP) that a lot of them are leathered before going in.

May I suggest a hobby, or a pet?

So reverse predict means remembering?

So a KO win in round 3 would be a KO Loss in round 13?

BALTIMORA wrote:

Michaels, Sean wrote:One of the highlights of my week is nipping out to the car at lunch and listening to PM's Questions on 5 live. They're mental! I actually know (from a former conservative MP) that a lot of them are leathered before going in.

May I suggest a hobby, or a pet?

Or a subscription to Razzle

joeyjojo618 wrote:So reverse predict means remembering?

By jove he's got it. As mentioned right up at the top there, yes.

Imperial Ghosty wrote:So a KO win in round 3 would be a KO Loss in round 13?

No, it wouldn't. Are you quite mad?

Union Cane wrote:

Imperial Ghosty wrote:So a KO win in round 3 would be a KO Loss in round 13?

No, it wouldn't. Are you quite mad?

In that case I haven't got a clue what you're on about

joeyjojo618 wrote:So reverse predict means remembering?

Apparently so. Although surely it'd make more sense if a reverse prediction was actually...oh I've lost that thought now. Balls.

You're not alone in that IG.

I thought 'remember' meant that you had explained your oddball theory on a previous thread, sorry.

God you lot are thick, what you basically do is pick a fight and then recall how you thought it would go and then feed this data through the flux capacitor which will give you the mean outcome based on all our predictions, you then do the same for the winning fighters previous fight, hence the reverse element and continue until the outcome is that Prime Tyson is the greatest FACT!!

It's really not that difficult.

I was with you up until '...basically...'.

And what if we dont have the required 1.21 Gigawatts needed to operate a flux capacitor?

Joey do you not think Union will have considered this, is fairly obvious he has stuff like that under control.

ONE POINT TWENTY-ONE GIGAWATTS???!?!????

Anyway, it was Marciano KO 1.

Now shush.

Union Cane wrote:Anyway, it was Marciano KO 1.

Now shush.

What was?

The answer.

If that was the answer, what was the question?

Thought so. These reverse threads make my head hurt more than twenty minutes on a 3DS..!!

Unless the question is what is the least likely prediction Azania would make in a Marciano fight?

I don't know any more.

I'm going home to rest.

Azania has gone quiet,and Audley has piped up..have they been seen together in the same room, is all I'm saying..

So, what's the next question??