Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
+18
Thomond
Lowlandbrit
crazy_dave23
sodhat
Bull
Number-25
mikeygnfl
Derbyblue
Good Golly I'm Olly
Take it to the house
twelve283
Pr4wn
Colan (niner)
CFCNick
cherriesfna
BamBam
NYJ
GSC
22 posters
Page 1 of 21
Page 1 of 21 • 1, 2, 3 ... 11 ... 21
Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
Since threads seem to go to 1000 posts
Free Agency:
Mike Wallace, Daniel Ellerbe to Miami
Martellus Bennett to Chicago
Paul Kruger to Cleveland
Greg Toler + 3 head to Colts
Andy Levitre to Tennessee
Free Agency:
Mike Wallace, Daniel Ellerbe to Miami
Martellus Bennett to Chicago
Paul Kruger to Cleveland
Greg Toler + 3 head to Colts
Andy Levitre to Tennessee
Last edited by GSC on Tue 12 Mar 2013, 22:20; edited 2 times in total
GSC- Posts : 43496
Join date : 2011-03-28
Age : 32
Location : Leicester
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
Ah, I see. I thought you meant that the thread won't actually let you post when it gets to 1000.
Carry on.
Carry on.
NYJ- Posts : 860
Join date : 2013-02-28
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
Nah I just try not to annoy the powers that be unless I'm bored
GSC- Posts : 43496
Join date : 2011-03-28
Age : 32
Location : Leicester
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
cherriesfna wrote:Olly wrote:Seahawks, Jets, Dolphins and Giants after Charles Woodson
We surly have to be favourite if he wants to join a contender, image Sherman browner Woodson chancellor and Thomas in the backfield
Yes, after all the Seahawks are the only contender in the entire NFL
BamBam- Posts : 17226
Join date : 2011-03-17
Age : 35
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
In fact, why don't we just give them the next 10 Lombardi Trophies right now
BamBam- Posts : 17226
Join date : 2011-03-17
Age : 35
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
Why don't we just stop responding to Cherries?
GSC- Posts : 43496
Join date : 2011-03-28
Age : 32
Location : Leicester
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
BamBam wrote:cherriesfna wrote:Olly wrote:Seahawks, Jets, Dolphins and Giants after Charles Woodson
We surly have to be favourite if he wants to join a contender, image Sherman browner Woodson chancellor and Thomas in the backfield
Yes, after all the Seahawks are the only contender in the entire NFL
Well out of those teams Seattle is clearly the best
cherriesfna- Posts : 7056
Join date : 2011-02-01
Age : 29
Location : Between Bournemouth and Hayling
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
From the other thread:
Yeah Giants haven't had any sucess recently... Dolphins aren't far off considering it looks like they're adding Wallace and keeping Hartline, which leaves them weak at DB, plus with them being in the AFC he won't face the Packers often.cherriesfna wrote:Olly wrote:Seahawks, Jets, Dolphins and Giants after Charles Woodson
We surly have to be favourite if he wants to join a contender, image Sherman browner Woodson chancellor and Thomas in the backfield
Derbyblue- Posts : 4528
Join date : 2011-03-24
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
Derbyblue wrote:From the other thread:Yeah Giants haven't had any sucess recently... Dolphins aren't far off considering it looks like they're adding Wallace and keeping Hartline, which leaves them weak at DB, plus with them being in the AFC he won't face the Packers often.cherriesfna wrote:Olly wrote:Seahawks, Jets, Dolphins and Giants after Charles Woodson
We surly have to be favourite if he wants to join a contender, image Sherman browner Woodson chancellor and Thomas in the backfield
History dont matter giants went that good LAST YEAR and Seattle are undoubtably better than the giants
cherriesfna- Posts : 7056
Join date : 2011-02-01
Age : 29
Location : Between Bournemouth and Hayling
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
Falcons will have a new stadium in Atlanta
GSC- Posts : 43496
Join date : 2011-03-28
Age : 32
Location : Leicester
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
That would be history... And yes it does matter. You're right last year will have been a disappointment but they only just missed out on making the post season and the season before they won the Super bowl, how much has really changed in those two years that makes you believe they couldn't make it into the postseason again?cherriesfna wrote:Derbyblue wrote:From the other thread:Yeah Giants haven't had any sucess recently... Dolphins aren't far off considering it looks like they're adding Wallace and keeping Hartline, which leaves them weak at DB, plus with them being in the AFC he won't face the Packers often.cherriesfna wrote:Olly wrote:Seahawks, Jets, Dolphins and Giants after Charles Woodson
We surly have to be favourite if he wants to join a contender, image Sherman browner Woodson chancellor and Thomas in the backfield
History dont matter giants went that good LAST YEAR and Seattle are undoubtably better than the giants
Derbyblue- Posts : 4528
Join date : 2011-03-24
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
cherriesfna wrote:Derbyblue wrote:From the other thread:Yeah Giants haven't had any sucess recently... Dolphins aren't far off considering it looks like they're adding Wallace and keeping Hartline, which leaves them weak at DB, plus with them being in the AFC he won't face the Packers often.cherriesfna wrote:Olly wrote:Seahawks, Jets, Dolphins and Giants after Charles Woodson
We surly have to be favourite if he wants to join a contender, image Sherman browner Woodson chancellor and Thomas in the backfield
History dont matter giants went that good LAST YEAR and Seattle are undoubtably better than the giants
It don't mean a thing if you ain't got that ring(s).
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
Derbyblue wrote:That would be history... And yes it does matter. You're right last year will have been a disappointment but they only just missed out on making the post season and the season before they won the Super bowl, how much has really changed in those two years that makes you believe they couldn't make it into the postseason again?cherriesfna wrote:Derbyblue wrote:From the other thread:Yeah Giants haven't had any sucess recently... Dolphins aren't far off considering it looks like they're adding Wallace and keeping Hartline, which leaves them weak at DB, plus with them being in the AFC he won't face the Packers often.cherriesfna wrote:Olly wrote:Seahawks, Jets, Dolphins and Giants after Charles Woodson
We surly have to be favourite if he wants to join a contender, image Sherman browner Woodson chancellor and Thomas in the backfield
History dont matter giants went that good LAST YEAR and Seattle are undoubtably better than the giants
They finish 9-7 Seattle went 11-5 and so close to the championship game, if Woodson wanted to go the the team with the best chance of a SB he should choose Seattle
cherriesfna- Posts : 7056
Join date : 2011-02-01
Age : 29
Location : Between Bournemouth and Hayling
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
MockingJay33 wrote:cherriesfna wrote:Derbyblue wrote:From the other thread:Yeah Giants haven't had any sucess recently... Dolphins aren't far off considering it looks like they're adding Wallace and keeping Hartline, which leaves them weak at DB, plus with them being in the AFC he won't face the Packers often.cherriesfna wrote:Olly wrote:Seahawks, Jets, Dolphins and Giants after Charles Woodson
We surly have to be favourite if he wants to join a contender, image Sherman browner Woodson chancellor and Thomas in the backfield
History dont matter giants went that good LAST YEAR and Seattle are undoubtably better than the giants
It don't mean a thing if you ain't got that ring(s).
Like the rings the jets have
cherriesfna- Posts : 7056
Join date : 2011-02-01
Age : 29
Location : Between Bournemouth and Hayling
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
cherriesfna wrote:MockingJay33 wrote:cherriesfna wrote:Derbyblue wrote:From the other thread:Yeah Giants haven't had any sucess recently... Dolphins aren't far off considering it looks like they're adding Wallace and keeping Hartline, which leaves them weak at DB, plus with them being in the AFC he won't face the Packers often.cherriesfna wrote:Olly wrote:Seahawks, Jets, Dolphins and Giants after Charles Woodson
We surly have to be favourite if he wants to join a contender, image Sherman browner Woodson chancellor and Thomas in the backfield
History dont matter giants went that good LAST YEAR and Seattle are undoubtably better than the giants
It don't mean a thing if you ain't got that ring(s).
Like the rings the jets have
I'm not talking about the Jets. They suck.
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
MockingJay33 wrote:cherriesfna wrote:MockingJay33 wrote:cherriesfna wrote:Derbyblue wrote:From the other thread:Yeah Giants haven't had any sucess recently... Dolphins aren't far off considering it looks like they're adding Wallace and keeping Hartline, which leaves them weak at DB, plus with them being in the AFC he won't face the Packers often.cherriesfna wrote:Olly wrote:Seahawks, Jets, Dolphins and Giants after Charles Woodson
We surly have to be favourite if he wants to join a contender, image Sherman browner Woodson chancellor and Thomas in the backfield
History dont matter giants went that good LAST YEAR and Seattle are undoubtably better than the giants
It don't mean a thing if you ain't got that ring(s).
Like the rings the jets have
I'm not talking about the Jets. They suck.
And rings from history don't mean nothin , Seattle are better than the giants
cherriesfna- Posts : 7056
Join date : 2011-02-01
Age : 29
Location : Between Bournemouth and Hayling
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
The Giants 2012 opponents finished a collective 111-96-1. Seattle's opponents went 104-102-2.
We both went 4-1 vs common opponents, both beat Carolina, GB, Seattle split 1-1 with SF and we went 1-1 with Dallas. But I'll stress we actually beat the Packers fair and square plus we humiliated the 49ers in their backyard. We played 6 playoff teams including the two NFC CG teams and the Super Bowl winners, WAS, @BAL, @CIN, @SF, GB & @ATL 5/7 on the road. Seattle played 4, SF, NE, GB & MIN all at home plus a trip to SF.
I'd say there's more than enough evidence there to say the Seahawks had an easier schedule and a dodgy gifted win.
Also, it's not just HISTORY but the Giants roster is packed with players who have rings for the franchise. Unlike the Dolphins, Jets & Seahawks.
We both went 4-1 vs common opponents, both beat Carolina, GB, Seattle split 1-1 with SF and we went 1-1 with Dallas. But I'll stress we actually beat the Packers fair and square plus we humiliated the 49ers in their backyard. We played 6 playoff teams including the two NFC CG teams and the Super Bowl winners, WAS, @BAL, @CIN, @SF, GB & @ATL 5/7 on the road. Seattle played 4, SF, NE, GB & MIN all at home plus a trip to SF.
I'd say there's more than enough evidence there to say the Seahawks had an easier schedule and a dodgy gifted win.
Also, it's not just HISTORY but the Giants roster is packed with players who have rings for the franchise. Unlike the Dolphins, Jets & Seahawks.
Last edited by MockingJay33 on Thu 07 Mar 2013, 22:03; edited 1 time in total
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKYNh1TW01Y
Richard Sherman being trolled by Skip
Richard Sherman being trolled by Skip
GSC- Posts : 43496
Join date : 2011-03-28
Age : 32
Location : Leicester
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
the Seahawks have no history, the only reason we are talking about them is because they are in the same division as the niners. The Cardinals and Rams are more successful teams....
Colan (niner)- Posts : 1916
Join date : 2011-05-01
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
GSC wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKYNh1TW01Y
Richard Sherman being trolled by Skip
Well Skip got what he wanted haha #journocode
Colan (niner)- Posts : 1916
Join date : 2011-05-01
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
Rams yes, Cards are in the running for worst franchise
GSC- Posts : 43496
Join date : 2011-03-28
Age : 32
Location : Leicester
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
MockingJay33 wrote:The Giants 2012 opponents finished a collective 111-96-1. Seattle's opponents went 104-102-2.
We both went 4-1 vs common opponents, both beat Carolina, GB, Seattle split 1-1 with SF and we went 1-1 with Dallas. But I'll stress we actually beat the Packers fair and square plus we humiliated the 49ers in their backyard. We played 6 playoff teams including the two NFC CG teams and the Super Bowl winners, WAS, @BAL, @CIN, @SF, GB & @ATL 5/7 on the road. Seattle played 4, SF, NE, GB & MIN all at home plus a trip to SF.
I'd say there's more than enough evidence there to say the Seahawks had an easier schedule and a dodgy gifted win.
Also, it's not just HISTORY but the Giants roster is packed with players who have rings for the franchise. Unlike the Dolphins, Jets & Seahawks.
But if Woodson wanted another ring he'd join the team more lily to do so next season , which is seattle
cherriesfna- Posts : 7056
Join date : 2011-02-01
Age : 29
Location : Between Bournemouth and Hayling
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
Colan (niner) wrote:GSC wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKYNh1TW01Y
Richard Sherman being trolled by Skip
Well Skip got what he wanted haha #journocode
Funny how people hate on Sherman, if he was n your team you would love him ,
cherriesfna- Posts : 7056
Join date : 2011-02-01
Age : 29
Location : Between Bournemouth and Hayling
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
Colan (niner) wrote:the Seahawks have no history, the only reason we are talking about them is because they are in the same division as the niners. The Cardinals and Rams are more successful teams....
Hawks just went 11-5, they have an amazing QB and RB, have an all pro centre, and an elite DEFENSE , an are primed to knock the 9ers off the top of the division , there are other reason why to talk about them
cherriesfna- Posts : 7056
Join date : 2011-02-01
Age : 29
Location : Between Bournemouth and Hayling
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
cherriesfna wrote:MockingJay33 wrote:The Giants 2012 opponents finished a collective 111-96-1. Seattle's opponents went 104-102-2.
We both went 4-1 vs common opponents, both beat Carolina, GB, Seattle split 1-1 with SF and we went 1-1 with Dallas. But I'll stress we actually beat the Packers fair and square plus we humiliated the 49ers in their backyard. We played 6 playoff teams including the two NFC CG teams and the Super Bowl winners, WAS, @BAL, @CIN, @SF, GB & @ATL 5/7 on the road. Seattle played 4, SF, NE, GB & MIN all at home plus a trip to SF.
I'd say there's more than enough evidence there to say the Seahawks had an easier schedule and a dodgy gifted win.
Also, it's not just HISTORY but the Giants roster is packed with players who have rings for the franchise. Unlike the Dolphins, Jets & Seahawks.
But if Woodson wanted another ring he'd join the team more lily to do so next season , which is seattle
The funny thing about the NFL is that next season because we aren't the reigning champs and finished 2nd in our division we'll have an easier schedule and because you went 11=5 and made the playoffs yours will be harder. I wouldn't be surprised if Seattle miss the playoffs next season. NYG and NO will be stronger and have easier schedules.
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
Guys, guys. You'll both be terrible
GSC- Posts : 43496
Join date : 2011-03-28
Age : 32
Location : Leicester
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
GSC wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKYNh1TW01Y
Richard Sherman being trolled by Skip
2 of the biggest bellends in America in one clip
I would love to see Lebron James lay Skip out for all the crap he said about him
BamBam- Posts : 17226
Join date : 2011-03-17
Age : 35
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
Skip Bayless - The Adrian Durham of American TV
Good Golly I'm Olly- Tractor Boy
- Posts : 51303
Join date : 2011-09-18
Age : 29
Location : Chris Woakes's wardrobe
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
MockingJay33 wrote:cherriesfna wrote:MockingJay33 wrote:The Giants 2012 opponents finished a collective 111-96-1. Seattle's opponents went 104-102-2.
We both went 4-1 vs common opponents, both beat Carolina, GB, Seattle split 1-1 with SF and we went 1-1 with Dallas. But I'll stress we actually beat the Packers fair and square plus we humiliated the 49ers in their backyard. We played 6 playoff teams including the two NFC CG teams and the Super Bowl winners, WAS, @BAL, @CIN, @SF, GB & @ATL 5/7 on the road. Seattle played 4, SF, NE, GB & MIN all at home plus a trip to SF.
I'd say there's more than enough evidence there to say the Seahawks had an easier schedule and a dodgy gifted win.
Also, it's not just HISTORY but the Giants roster is packed with players who have rings for the franchise. Unlike the Dolphins, Jets & Seahawks.
But if Woodson wanted another ring he'd join the team more lily to do so next season , which is seattle
The funny thing about the NFL is that next season because we aren't the reigning champs and finished 2nd in our division we'll have an easier schedule and because you went 11=5 and made the playoffs yours will be harder. I wouldn't be surprised if Seattle miss the playoffs next season. NYG and NO will be stronger and have easier schedules.
we finished 2nd aswell.....
so we playeach other, while our 2nd placegameis home to vikings,and yours is @ Panthers. so pretty equal, yes u do play the AFC west but we play the south , so no real differnce there. your divsion is a shoot-out, like ours, andwe each have a suckyteam to beat twice, so stregth of scedule is preety even, but seattle have the better all round team, that is a FACT,
the seattle dynasty is here, our team now beats the 05SB team hands down
cherriesfna- Posts : 7056
Join date : 2011-02-01
Age : 29
Location : Between Bournemouth and Hayling
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
Thing is Seattle do have a decent team Cherries, you're just going a tad over the top with it.
Hyperbole I believe is the term
Hyperbole I believe is the term
Good Golly I'm Olly- Tractor Boy
- Posts : 51303
Join date : 2011-09-18
Age : 29
Location : Chris Woakes's wardrobe
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
we are now annual SB contenders,we are a top 5 team in the league
1The Broncos
2The Pats
3The Flacons
4and id have us and the niners tied right now,
yh yh baltimore won the SB, but there losing alot this offseason andwill be the NYG of last year.
ihonestlky believe that,
unless someone can tell me that we arnt after watching all 18 hawks games this years, if you have wacthed all 18 games the you ahve my opermission to tell me we are bad, ive watched all the games all the plays and i knowwe are a top 5 team and SB contenders
cherriesfna- Posts : 7056
Join date : 2011-02-01
Age : 29
Location : Between Bournemouth and Hayling
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZboLvHy9eS8
boom sherm, tell the talentless Muppet what he is
boom sherm, tell the talentless Muppet what he is
cherriesfna- Posts : 7056
Join date : 2011-02-01
Age : 29
Location : Between Bournemouth and Hayling
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
Honestly I don't know why people bother responding to him.
GSC- Posts : 43496
Join date : 2011-03-28
Age : 32
Location : Leicester
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
Have you watched every game every other team has played this year too? How else can you judge the Seagulls to be top 5 without watching the rest?
BamBam- Posts : 17226
Join date : 2011-03-17
Age : 35
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
James Harrison getting closer to being released by Pittsburgh
Good Golly I'm Olly- Tractor Boy
- Posts : 51303
Join date : 2011-09-18
Age : 29
Location : Chris Woakes's wardrobe
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
BamBam wrote:Have you watched every game every other team has played this year too? How else can you judge the Seagulls to be top 5 without watching the rest?
ive seen a good 4-5 games of all contenders during reg season, i boubt anyone ever looked atthe hawks during the reg season
cherriesfna- Posts : 7056
Join date : 2011-02-01
Age : 29
Location : Between Bournemouth and Hayling
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
I'm not going to reply after this. But cherries, you are,nt annual SB contenders, you haven't been in one in ages. You haven't even made championship game. Also you and niners are not tied, you may have beat the 49ers one game but they are still the standard of the division and have actually made a SB recently with a young team. And having Denver, Flacons or Pats ranked above niners is weird choice too, envy isn't nice. And laugh out loud at dynasty, win the divsion first and we'll talk.you said the exact same stuff prior to last season and Seattle still didn't win the division and didn't make the SB. And with 49ers key players all signed, by far most draft picks and cap room, good luck in 2018 maybe but until then this isn't even a UTD and City situation, it is like United vs Ipswich
Colan (niner)- Posts : 1916
Join date : 2011-05-01
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
Colan (niner) wrote:I'm not going to reply after this. But cherries, you are,nt annual SB contenders, you haven't been in one in ages. You haven't even made championship game. Also you and niners are not tied, you may have beat the 49ers one game but they are still the standard of the division and have actually made a SB recently with a young team. And having Denver, Flacons or Pats ranked above niners is weird choice too, envy isn't nice. And laugh out loud at dynasty, win the divsion first and we'll talk.you said the exact same stuff prior to last season and Seattle still didn't win the division and didn't make the SB. And with 49ers key players all signed, by far most draft picks and cap room, good luck in 2018 maybe but until then this isn't even a UTD and City situation, it is like United vs Ipswich
its on like donkey kong next year
hawks niners i will guarentee you 2 prime time games,
just remmebr the beatdown we handed to you last time, kaep couldnt handle the heat of the Clink ,
next yera is our year, 3elieve
cherriesfna- Posts : 7056
Join date : 2011-02-01
Age : 29
Location : Between Bournemouth and Hayling
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
For all but a bounce of the ball or a tackle here and there the 49ers could have easily been going into next season with two consecutive SB wins.
mikeygnfl- Posts : 3032
Join date : 2011-08-19
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
You mean if Kyle Williams could hold on to the ball and not pee his pants as Jacquian Williams and Devin Thomas were running at him?
The best part of that game wasn't any play. It was Steve Weatherford running around like a ten year old after the Tynes kick went through the posts. Love Weatherford.
The best part of that game wasn't any play. It was Steve Weatherford running around like a ten year old after the Tynes kick went through the posts. Love Weatherford.
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
mikeygnfl wrote:For all but a bounce of the ball or a tackle here and there the 49ers could have easily been going into next season with two consecutive SB wins.
Or if they didn't choke both times
cherriesfna- Posts : 7056
Join date : 2011-02-01
Age : 29
Location : Between Bournemouth and Hayling
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
I think there was a bit more than a bounce of a ball or a tackle here and there between the Ravens and 49ers. Until the power issue it was very onesided.mikeygnfl wrote:For all but a bounce of the ball or a tackle here and there the 49ers could have easily been going into next season with two consecutive SB wins.
Derbyblue- Posts : 4528
Join date : 2011-03-24
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
Or Atlanta gets a flag etc. What if scenarios are pointless.
GSC- Posts : 43496
Join date : 2011-03-28
Age : 32
Location : Leicester
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
All the ravens and Giants games imo show is that expeience counts.
Colan (niner)- Posts : 1916
Join date : 2011-05-01
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
Ultimately, for me is that SB winners are lucky.
Not a bad thing but every SB winner has needed a break at some point.
Not a bad thing but every SB winner has needed a break at some point.
GSC- Posts : 43496
Join date : 2011-03-28
Age : 32
Location : Leicester
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
Matt Moore re-signs with the Dolphins. I'm disappointed. He would have been a great stop gap for this season before we get our franchise QB in the 2014 draft.
Why does he want to play back up to Tannehill when he can be a starter at the Jets?
Why does he want to play back up to Tannehill when he can be a starter at the Jets?
NYJ- Posts : 860
Join date : 2013-02-28
GSC- Posts : 43496
Join date : 2011-03-28
Age : 32
Location : Leicester
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
That's a slight surprise, he was being mentioned as a possible signing to challenge Weeden. While I thought he would get the Miami starting job last year it's clearly gone so it's probably all down to money as per usual.NYJ wrote:Matt Moore re-signs with the Dolphins. I'm disappointed. He would have been a great stop gap for this season before we get our franchise QB in the 2014 draft.
Why does he want to play back up to Tannehill when he can be a starter at the Jets?
Derbyblue- Posts : 4528
Join date : 2011-03-24
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
Eh, at this point hes a backup. Take more money to hold a clipboard in a better situation than New York or Cleveland.
GSC- Posts : 43496
Join date : 2011-03-28
Age : 32
Location : Leicester
Re: Ongoing NFL discussion thread part 2
GSC wrote:Safety?
Depends how long his contract is. I think it's a shrewd move by the Dolphins though. He is better than some starting QB's.
NYJ- Posts : 860
Join date : 2013-02-28
Page 1 of 21 • 1, 2, 3 ... 11 ... 21
Similar topics
» Ongoing NFL Discussion Thread Part 3
» Ongoing NFL discussion thread
» Ongoing NFL Discussion Thread V
» Ongoing NFL Discussion Thread V
» Ongoing NFL Discussion Thread IV
» Ongoing NFL discussion thread
» Ongoing NFL Discussion Thread V
» Ongoing NFL Discussion Thread V
» Ongoing NFL Discussion Thread IV
Page 1 of 21
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum