Merged thread euro competition
+72
No 7&1/2
Solid8
ScarletSpiderman
St John The Enforcer
RF09
BigTrevsbigmac
MarcusHalberstram
Feckless Rogue
tatterd
stevetynant
Hound of Harrow
justified sinner
Tramptastic
nth
Irish Londoner
Luckless Pedestrian
the-goon
Taffineastbourne
rodders
alcoombe
madmaccas
Dubbelyew L Overate
malky1963
broadlandboy
munkian
markb
Bathman_in_London
fa0019
lostinwales
Casartelli
Biltong
Cyril
ChequeredJersey
Brendan
whocares
beshocked
Toohey
Scrumpy
gregortree
LondonTiger
Standulstermen
George Carlin
itsallabouttheincentives
emack2
Nos na Gaoithe
allyt2k
Intotouch
TJ
Welshmushroom
mr-bryns-attitude
21st Century Schizoid Man
Totalflanker
IanBru
Pot Hale
Jenifer McLadyboy
Poorfour
HammerofThunor
butterfingers
nathan
wayne
Notch
bedfordwelsh
The Saint
Artful_Dodger
formerly known as Sam
stub
maestegmafia
Exiledinborders
Big
LordDowlais
Portnoy's Complaint
AsLongAsBut100ofUs
76 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Rugby Union :: Club Rugby
Page 1 of 21
Page 1 of 21 • 1, 2, 3 ... 11 ... 21
Merged thread euro competition
Apparently there's a meeting today of two mighty behemoths of the English game meet to (presumably) find a common position on the wreckage of the negotiations on the future of European competition.
It will be interesting if they come to any clear (I doubt that it will be satisfactory) conclusion.
This, remember, is a discussion between two spectacularly incompetent bodies which have presided over farcical maladministration over the past decade.
The RFU, standard bearers of the ideals and ethos of the famed 57 Old Farts, have stumbled and staggered their way 'forward' since the dawn of professionalism.
vs
The PRL who have never managed to provide a satisfactory cohesive, decision which actually improves the English game with a satisfactory watertight, long term 'what if?' structured set of rules. They in their short history have represented solely the elite game through a seemingly never-ending stream of short-term, knee-jerk decisions which sow the quick-germinating seeds of insoluble and self-contradictory positions for the future. From its inception it has been nothing less than a disaster from the issue of voting shares, through parachute payments to the fundamental process of promotion/relegation itself. Bumbling incompetents.
Unfortunately they (the PRL) have the players and therefore all the cards over the RFU exactly two years before the 2015 RWC starts on English soil.
Grim and depressing innit? Especially for non-combatants.
It will be interesting if they come to any clear (I doubt that it will be satisfactory) conclusion.
This, remember, is a discussion between two spectacularly incompetent bodies which have presided over farcical maladministration over the past decade.
The RFU, standard bearers of the ideals and ethos of the famed 57 Old Farts, have stumbled and staggered their way 'forward' since the dawn of professionalism.
vs
The PRL who have never managed to provide a satisfactory cohesive, decision which actually improves the English game with a satisfactory watertight, long term 'what if?' structured set of rules. They in their short history have represented solely the elite game through a seemingly never-ending stream of short-term, knee-jerk decisions which sow the quick-germinating seeds of insoluble and self-contradictory positions for the future. From its inception it has been nothing less than a disaster from the issue of voting shares, through parachute payments to the fundamental process of promotion/relegation itself. Bumbling incompetents.
Unfortunately they (the PRL) have the players and therefore all the cards over the RFU exactly two years before the 2015 RWC starts on English soil.
Grim and depressing innit? Especially for non-combatants.
Portnoy's Complaint- Posts : 3498
Join date : 2012-10-03
Age : 74
Location : Felixstowe
Re: Merged thread euro competition
Ian Ritchie seemed pleasingly tight lipped in the press - others could learn from him
AsLongAsBut100ofUs- Posts : 14129
Join date : 2011-03-26
Age : 112
Location : Devon/London
Re: Merged thread euro competition
Shame that 'Boot-Boy' Mr Wray can't keep his gob shut though, As.
Stirring it up by facetious and totally divisive talk of Leinster (or any other Irish province) is loose and incomprehedable. And he's not a PRL official so far as I'm aware.
Stirring it up by facetious and totally divisive talk of Leinster (or any other Irish province) is loose and incomprehedable. And he's not a PRL official so far as I'm aware.
Portnoy's Complaint- Posts : 3498
Join date : 2012-10-03
Age : 74
Location : Felixstowe
Re: Merged thread euro competition
Wray, Walkinshaw, McCafferty, Quentin Smith, and even our own Tony Rowe - not impressedPortnoy's Complaint wrote:Shame that 'Boot-Boy' Mr Wray can't keep his gob shut though, As.
Stirring it up by facetious and totally divisive talk of Leinster (or any other Irish province) is loose and incomprehedable. And he's not a PRL official so far as I'm aware.
AsLongAsBut100ofUs- Posts : 14129
Join date : 2011-03-26
Age : 112
Location : Devon/London
Re: Merged thread euro competition
Seems to me that the whole tenor of this debate since the Franglos dropped their bombshell in June last year has shifted from a Celtalian united defiance to a glum resentment and acceptance of the inevitable conclusion.
Now it seems that the IRB will accept a Franglo tournament, only domestic agreements between the Franglo Unions and their elite club representatives stands in the way...
Now it seems that the IRB will accept a Franglo tournament, only domestic agreements between the Franglo Unions and their elite club representatives stands in the way...
Portnoy's Complaint- Posts : 3498
Join date : 2012-10-03
Age : 74
Location : Felixstowe
Re: Merged thread euro competition
This is not going to end well for anyone, trust me when I say this, the six nations will be next, lets not forget, it is still an invitational tournament and things could get spiteful and ugly.
LordDowlais- Posts : 15419
Join date : 2011-05-18
Location : Merthyr Tydfil
Re: Merged thread euro competition
The Six Nations is an IRB-sponsored tournament, LD. And as such the Unions each have the right to enter.
The problem being that it's not so much an invitational one rather than an exclusive cartel that makes it a self-interested number of major nations that actively combine to make it an impossibility for 'outsiders' to join and share the spoils.
The problem being that it's not so much an invitational one rather than an exclusive cartel that makes it a self-interested number of major nations that actively combine to make it an impossibility for 'outsiders' to join and share the spoils.
Portnoy's Complaint- Posts : 3498
Join date : 2012-10-03
Age : 74
Location : Felixstowe
Re: Merged thread euro competition
Well it's clearly not impossible for an outsider to join as it has been managed once in the pro era when Italy joined.Portnoy's Complaint wrote:The Six Nations is an IRB-sponsored tournament, LD. And as such the Unions each have the right to enter.
The problem being that it's not so much an invitational one rather than an exclusive cartel that makes it a self-interested number of major nations that actively combine to make it an impossibility for 'outsiders' to join and share the spoils.
Big- Posts : 815
Join date : 2011-08-18
Location : Durham
Re: Merged thread euro competition
Quite right and being realistic which European country could join and not get thrashed in every match?Big wrote:Well it's clearly not impossible for an outsider to join as it has been managed once in the pro era when Italy joined.Portnoy's Complaint wrote:The Six Nations is an IRB-sponsored tournament, LD. And as such the Unions each have the right to enter.
The problem being that it's not so much an invitational one rather than an exclusive cartel that makes it a self-interested number of major nations that actively combine to make it an impossibility for 'outsiders' to join and share the spoils.
Exiledinborders- Posts : 1645
Join date : 2012-03-18
Location : Scottish Borders
Re: Merged thread euro competition
But that very logic is the key of the HEC accord renegotiations. Just as Zebre ar not good enough to stay in whilst others are better qualified, the 6Ns cartel countries maybe ought to be subjected to promotion and relegation via a playoff system. Personally I favour a divisional 4Ns.
Portnoy's Complaint- Posts : 3498
Join date : 2012-10-03
Age : 74
Location : Felixstowe
Re: Merged thread euro competition
The IRB Cheif Executive Brett Gosper saidPortnoy's Complaint wrote:Seems to me that the whole tenor of this debate since the Franglos dropped their bombshell in June last year has shifted from a Celtalian united defiance to a glum resentment and acceptance of the inevitable conclusion.
Now it seems that the IRB will accept a Franglo tournament, only domestic agreements between the Franglo Unions and their elite club representatives stands in the way...
"We don’t think it’s in the interests of the game a competition such as that, no,” Gosper said yesterday. “We don’t believe in an Anglo-French competition in itself. We strongly believe it should be a European competition and that’s what we would be supporting and throwing our weight behind . . . We urge all of those parties to get together and find some common ground because we believe it’s in the interests of the game to do so.”
So no I don't think that the Franglo breakaway thing is going to happen at all.
maestegmafia- Posts : 23145
Join date : 2011-03-05
Location : Glyncorrwg
Detail released of new competition
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-union/24194481
The proposed replacement for the Heineken Cup will be called the Rugby Champions Cup, English and French clubs have announced.
They will quit the Heineken Cup at the end of this season because they object to the current set-up for a number of reasons.
“A joint working group has been created to prepare all necessary elements”
The issues include qualification and the way revenue is shared.
A Premiership Rugby statement said: "The competition will be based on the principles of qualification on merit."
Premier Rugby added the new tournament will have "a strong competition format, equality between the leagues, higher commercial values for the teams and expansion into new European markets".
A statement concluded: "The Top 14 and Premiership Rugby clubs have already confirmed their participation in the new competition and a joint working group has been created to prepare all necessary elements in good time for the 2014-15 season."
The International Rugby Board said it will only back the new pan-European club tournament if the French and English rugby unions approve it.
England's Aviva Premiership and France's Top14 leagues believe the current Heineken Cup structure favours teams from the RaboDirect Pro12, which is made up of sides from Wales, Scotland, Ireland and Italy, who will be allowed to join the potential new tournament.
Only the top six in England and France are guaranteed a place in the Heineken Cup, which began in the 1995-96 season, whereas at least 10 Celtic League outfits - including both Scottish, both Italian and a minimum of three sides each from Wales and Ireland - have certain entry into the competition.
With the Pro12 having no relegation, it is argued teams can rest players for league matches to keep them fresh for Europe, while Premiership and Top 14 teams have to fight hard just to qualify.
The English and French clubs are also unhappy with the way revenues are split between the three leagues and want to keep a greater share
2013-14 Heineken Cup structure
• France: 7 (Castres, Toulon, Toulouse, Clermont-Auvergne, Racing Metro, Montpellier, Perpignan)
• England: 6 (Northampton, Exeter, Saracens, Harlequins, Leicester, Gloucester)
• Ireland: 4 (Leinster, Connacht, Ulster, Munster)
• Wales: 3 (Ospreys, Cardiff, Scarlets)
• Scotland: 2 (Glasgow, Edinburgh)
• Italy: 2 (Zebre, Treviso)
Nothing too new there is there?
The proposed replacement for the Heineken Cup will be called the Rugby Champions Cup, English and French clubs have announced.
They will quit the Heineken Cup at the end of this season because they object to the current set-up for a number of reasons.
“A joint working group has been created to prepare all necessary elements”
The issues include qualification and the way revenue is shared.
A Premiership Rugby statement said: "The competition will be based on the principles of qualification on merit."
Premier Rugby added the new tournament will have "a strong competition format, equality between the leagues, higher commercial values for the teams and expansion into new European markets".
A statement concluded: "The Top 14 and Premiership Rugby clubs have already confirmed their participation in the new competition and a joint working group has been created to prepare all necessary elements in good time for the 2014-15 season."
The International Rugby Board said it will only back the new pan-European club tournament if the French and English rugby unions approve it.
England's Aviva Premiership and France's Top14 leagues believe the current Heineken Cup structure favours teams from the RaboDirect Pro12, which is made up of sides from Wales, Scotland, Ireland and Italy, who will be allowed to join the potential new tournament.
Only the top six in England and France are guaranteed a place in the Heineken Cup, which began in the 1995-96 season, whereas at least 10 Celtic League outfits - including both Scottish, both Italian and a minimum of three sides each from Wales and Ireland - have certain entry into the competition.
With the Pro12 having no relegation, it is argued teams can rest players for league matches to keep them fresh for Europe, while Premiership and Top 14 teams have to fight hard just to qualify.
The English and French clubs are also unhappy with the way revenues are split between the three leagues and want to keep a greater share
2013-14 Heineken Cup structure
• France: 7 (Castres, Toulon, Toulouse, Clermont-Auvergne, Racing Metro, Montpellier, Perpignan)
• England: 6 (Northampton, Exeter, Saracens, Harlequins, Leicester, Gloucester)
• Ireland: 4 (Leinster, Connacht, Ulster, Munster)
• Wales: 3 (Ospreys, Cardiff, Scarlets)
• Scotland: 2 (Glasgow, Edinburgh)
• Italy: 2 (Zebre, Treviso)
Nothing too new there is there?
Last edited by stub on Sun 22 Sep 2013, 1:28 pm; edited 2 times in total (Reason for editing : Garbled paste.)
stub- Posts : 2226
Join date : 2013-01-31
Re: Merged thread euro competition
Nope nothing whatsoever.
You can almost predict that the announcement will come the day before the next ERC meeting.
You can almost predict that the announcement will come the day before the next ERC meeting.
maestegmafia- Posts : 23145
Join date : 2011-03-05
Location : Glyncorrwg
Re: Merged thread euro competition
I suspect they need to see if the Rabo unions will come and join in before they can set everything in stone.
formerly known as Sam- Posts : 21241
Join date : 2011-07-13
Age : 37
Location : Leicestershire
Re: Merged thread euro competition
The BBC, in the many many articles they have published on this have not once mentioned the main issue in all of this. Which is how the money is divided up. They keep talking about how many teams qualify from the Rabo and the factor of relegation. When anybody who knows anything about this whole situation knows that the sticking point is how the money is split between either unions or teams.
To be honest the BBC have become a bit of a waste of space, their standards are incredibly poor.
To be honest the BBC have become a bit of a waste of space, their standards are incredibly poor.
Artful_Dodger- Posts : 4260
Join date : 2011-05-31
Re: Merged thread euro competition
I've just seen the sentence at the bottom actually. My mistake.
Artful_Dodger- Posts : 4260
Join date : 2011-05-31
Re: Merged thread euro competition
No one will join a competition without details being given that may encourage/discourage them to join or not.formerly known as Sam wrote:I suspect they need to see if the Rabo unions will come and join in before they can set everything in stone.
The only news here is that the PRL have given this concept a name.
It is still no more likely to happen than next seasons HEC.
maestegmafia- Posts : 23145
Join date : 2011-03-05
Location : Glyncorrwg
Re: Merged thread euro competition
There we go, what it all boils down to. The Celtic & Italian teams will likely say 'shove it up yer ass' rather than risk bankrupting themselves while the rich get richer.Franglo morons wrote:The English and French clubs are also unhappy with the way revenues are split between the three leagues and want to keep a greater share
The Saint- Posts : 6046
Join date : 2013-05-04
Age : 35
Location : South-East Region
Re: Merged thread euro competition
Yeah theres no details as to playing format or how many teams will be involved, will they have a second string Amlin equivalent to or will it simply be the Orem and Top 14 split into groups then quarters semis final etc
bedfordwelsh- Moderator
- Posts : 9962
Join date : 2011-05-11
Age : 56
Re: Merged thread euro competition
Yes, not much detail - there is some mention of new European markets which suggests more than one competition I would think. But it's vague. They must be waiting to see who else will join before being able to really work out and share the details.
stub- Posts : 2226
Join date : 2013-01-31
Re: Merged thread euro competition
I'm in favour of this so long as there is a guarantee of at least one side from each of the Six Nations and an equal split of money between all participating teams in Tier 1 and Tier 2.
Notch- Moderator
- Posts : 25635
Join date : 2011-02-10
Age : 36
Location : Belfast
Re: Merged thread euro competition
I doubt that will be the case.
Although it must be said, if the desire is to expand into new European markets losing four of the six nations as markets to start with wouldn't be a good start. They should come up with a way to cut into the Italian market- maybe by having their teams qualify automatically?
Although it must be said, if the desire is to expand into new European markets losing four of the six nations as markets to start with wouldn't be a good start. They should come up with a way to cut into the Italian market- maybe by having their teams qualify automatically?
Notch- Moderator
- Posts : 25635
Join date : 2011-02-10
Age : 36
Location : Belfast
Re: Merged thread euro competition
Notch, basically RRW are more or less in agreement with what you say, Andrew Hore was on S4C at half time last night, in the interview he was trying to broach the subject, but the interviewer couldn't or wouldn't.Notch wrote:I'm in favour of this so long as there is a guarantee of at least one side from each of the Six Nations and an equal split of money between all participating teams in Tier 1 and Tier 2.
wayne- Posts : 3183
Join date : 2011-05-31
Location : Wales
Re: Merged thread euro competition
I'm no fan of the Murdoch Media Empire. I wouldn't be too displeased to see Europe's Premier competition go somewhere else. Of course, just as that happens Sky will go after the Pro12 to fill the gap in their schedules so it's not like we'll be free of them... oh well, we need them a lot more than they need us.
But more than anything I want a fair deal, and I have no idea if we're going to get that in this Anglo-French led breakaway. My instincts say they're going to insist on trying to screw us. The self-aggrandising media talk of how the English and French generate all the money doesn't exactly fill me with confidence that there will be an equal split of the profits. The talk is everyone will get more... but we'll get more than you.
Not good for European rugby, that attitude. Not good for a competitive tournament in the long term. If the PRL want this to be successful, they need to organise like the organise their own league. All competing teams get an equal share.
But more than anything I want a fair deal, and I have no idea if we're going to get that in this Anglo-French led breakaway. My instincts say they're going to insist on trying to screw us. The self-aggrandising media talk of how the English and French generate all the money doesn't exactly fill me with confidence that there will be an equal split of the profits. The talk is everyone will get more... but we'll get more than you.
Not good for European rugby, that attitude. Not good for a competitive tournament in the long term. If the PRL want this to be successful, they need to organise like the organise their own league. All competing teams get an equal share.
Notch- Moderator
- Posts : 25635
Join date : 2011-02-10
Age : 36
Location : Belfast
Re: Merged thread euro competition
Equal financial shares per team (well for tier 1 and 2 if that covered all AP12, Pro12 and T14) and votes per team seems a decent way forward to me in this scenario. Then some funds to grow new European rugby would be a bonus.
stub- Posts : 2226
Join date : 2013-01-31
Re: Merged thread euro competition
nice and mature there calling the french and english morons...The Saint wrote:There we go, what it all boils down to. The Celtic & Italian teams will likely say 'shove it up yer ass' rather than risk bankrupting themselves while the rich get richer.Franglo morons wrote:The English and French clubs are also unhappy with the way revenues are split between the three leagues and want to keep a greater share
nathan- Posts : 11033
Join date : 2011-06-14
Location : Leicestershire
Re: Merged thread euro competition
I'm not sure how a tournament like this could work.
Who runs this tournament, A Franglo consortium? Who determines structure and payout? And who governs this tournament?
Surely the ERC is in the best place possible to do so, oh hang on the ERC is the problem isn't it, a union run entity!
The PRL and LNR are essentially staging a coup not just over the ERC but their own unions too, if the RFU and FFR agree to this they are all but raising the white flag for the sport as we know it!
Who runs this tournament, A Franglo consortium? Who determines structure and payout? And who governs this tournament?
Surely the ERC is in the best place possible to do so, oh hang on the ERC is the problem isn't it, a union run entity!
The PRL and LNR are essentially staging a coup not just over the ERC but their own unions too, if the RFU and FFR agree to this they are all but raising the white flag for the sport as we know it!
butterfingers- Posts : 558
Join date : 2013-08-17
Re: Merged thread euro competition
I would imagine it's same as what they were asking for. If the Pro12 unions come in they'll have a third stake. The other stakes would go to the English and French clubs.
HammerofThunor- Posts : 10471
Join date : 2011-01-29
Location : Hull, England - Originally Potteries
Re: Merged thread euro competition
Statement from Peter Boyle of the IRFU;
"The RFU and French Rugby Federation have already confirmed that there will be no new company other than ERC to run European competitions. It is unequivocal that the negotiation of TV and other rights is central and it's done by ERC. The IRFU are bound into ERC and that restricts completely the movement of Leinster, Munster, Ulster and Connacht."
http://www.espn.co.uk/heineken-cup-2013-14/rugby/story/199325.html?CMP=OTC-RSS;utm_medium=twitter;utm_source=twitterfeed
He insists that the IRFU are willing to compromise on the issues of automatic competition and reducing the size of the Cup to 20 teams.
"The RFU and French Rugby Federation have already confirmed that there will be no new company other than ERC to run European competitions. It is unequivocal that the negotiation of TV and other rights is central and it's done by ERC. The IRFU are bound into ERC and that restricts completely the movement of Leinster, Munster, Ulster and Connacht."
http://www.espn.co.uk/heineken-cup-2013-14/rugby/story/199325.html?CMP=OTC-RSS;utm_medium=twitter;utm_source=twitterfeed
He insists that the IRFU are willing to compromise on the issues of automatic competition and reducing the size of the Cup to 20 teams.
Notch- Moderator
- Posts : 25635
Join date : 2011-02-10
Age : 36
Location : Belfast
Re: Merged thread euro competition
Back to what it hinges on really; the fate of rugby in Europe is in the hands of the RFU and FFR. Which side they land on will determine what happens next.
Notch- Moderator
- Posts : 25635
Join date : 2011-02-10
Age : 36
Location : Belfast
Re: Merged thread euro competition
In this argument I try to be as neutral as possible...HammerofThunor wrote:I would imagine it's same as what they were asking for. If the Pro12 unions come in they'll have a third stake. The other stakes would go to the English and French clubs.
In what way does 4 nations representing 2/3's of the Euro tournament deserve only 1/3rd stake?
As much as I want to see English clubs reaching the latter stages regularly, there must be some sort of barrier between money and the game we love, it must not be allowed to dictate the sport.
What stipulations does the PRL have on it's member clubs being relegated from the AP and non member clubs making euro rugby?
How interesting would a comp be where 2/3rds of the clubs come from 2 nations?
Why does Italy, Scotland, Wales or Ireland deserve to run the risk of having no representation in the euro comp top table?
The tournament is richer for having representation from every nation, it's richer for having a more diverse player pool, and more diverse club games surely?
butterfingers- Posts : 558
Join date : 2013-08-17
Re: Merged thread euro competition
YepNotch wrote:Back to what it hinges on really; the fate of rugby in Europe is in the hands of the RFU and FFR. Which side they land on will determine what happens next.
HammerofThunor- Posts : 10471
Join date : 2011-01-29
Location : Hull, England - Originally Potteries
Re: Merged thread euro competition
Thats the real problem here for me- how dull these changes are going to make things. I like that every year I see us play a variety of different teams. Should Ulster qualify for this hypothetical and still rather sketchy/make-believe tournament there's a chance we'd be in a pool with two French teams and an English team or two English teams or whatever... which is just more boring than what we have now. Sometimes it does happen in the current format mind you, depending on who wins the HC/Amlin, but not every year and not every pool. What the Heineken Cup has now is diversity which is what I'll miss the most about the old format.butterfingers wrote:How interesting would a comp be where 2/3rds of the clubs come from 2 nations?
Whatever happens, even if the rebels stayed in the ERC, it looks like there will be 4 less teams and they'll all come from the Pro12. Which makes it rather heavily weighted towards England/France and therefore less interesting for people outside those countries. And by the way, the Italians are quickly gaining a reputation as the best away trip in the Pro12 amongst those fans who travel to games. Incredibly friendly fans, beautiful country, great food and booze... oh I would miss them a lot if they didn't qualify.
I still remain in favour of a European European Cup and it seems that is more favoured by the ERC Camp...
Last edited by Notch on Sun 22 Sep 2013, 5:14 pm; edited 3 times in total
Notch- Moderator
- Posts : 25635
Join date : 2011-02-10
Age : 36
Location : Belfast
Re: Merged thread euro competition
You got tired of trolling on other threads then did you?nathan wrote:nice and mature there calling the french and english morons...The Saint wrote:There we go, what it all boils down to. The Celtic & Italian teams will likely say 'shove it up yer ass' rather than risk bankrupting themselves while the rich get richer.Franglo morons wrote:The English and French clubs are also unhappy with the way revenues are split between the three leagues and want to keep a greater share
#hypocrite .
The Saint- Posts : 6046
Join date : 2013-05-04
Age : 35
Location : South-East Region
Re: Merged thread euro competition
you making stuff up?The Saint wrote:You got tired of trolling on other threads then did you?nathan wrote:nice and mature there calling the french and english morons...The Saint wrote:There we go, what it all boils down to. The Celtic & Italian teams will likely say 'shove it up yer ass' rather than risk bankrupting themselves while the rich get richer.Franglo morons wrote:The English and French clubs are also unhappy with the way revenues are split between the three leagues and want to keep a greater share
#hypocrite .
saint calling someone else a troll! lol
I've never called anyone a moron!
nathan- Posts : 11033
Join date : 2011-06-14
Location : Leicestershire
Re: Merged thread euro competition
You could always follow the second tier competition, which would then have plenty of diversity. It could be just what's needed to make it a serious competition. Meanwhile, the top tier competition would become even more intenseNotch wrote:Thats the real problem here for me- how dull these changes are going to make things. I like that every year I see us play a variety of different teams. Should Ulster qualify for this hypothetical and still rather sketchy/make-believe tournament there's a chance we'd be in a pool with two French teams and an English team or two English teams or whatever... which is just more boring than what we have now. Sometimes it does happen in the current format mind you, depending on who wins the HC/Amlin, but not every year and not every pool. What the Heineken Cup has now is diversity which is what I'll miss the most about the old format.butterfingers wrote:How interesting would a comp be where 2/3rds of the clubs come from 2 nations?
Whatever happens, even if the rebels stayed in the ERC, it looks like there will be 4 less teams and they'll all come from the Pro12. Which makes it rather heavily weighted towards England/France and therefore less interesting for people outside those countries. And by the way, the Italians are quickly gaining a reputation as the best away trip in the Pro12 amongst those fans who travel to games. Incredibly friendly fans, beautiful country, great food and booze... oh I would miss them a lot if they didn't qualify.
I still remain in favour of a European European Cup and it seems that is more favoured by the ERC Camp...
Poorfour- Posts : 6407
Join date : 2011-10-01
Re: Merged thread euro competition
It's always going to be hard to square the circle.
Have they taken into account that the Irish, Scottish and Italian teams do not exist as "clubs" but are just branches of their respective union, and the Welsh are somewhere in the middle.
In principal, I personally would have no objection to any proposal from anywhere. I think they all should be considered. However I would really like all the current ERC stakeholders to thrash it out between them.
Have they taken into account that the Irish, Scottish and Italian teams do not exist as "clubs" but are just branches of their respective union, and the Welsh are somewhere in the middle.
In principal, I personally would have no objection to any proposal from anywhere. I think they all should be considered. However I would really like all the current ERC stakeholders to thrash it out between them.
Jenifer McLadyboy- Posts : 4764
Join date : 2011-06-30
Re: Merged thread euro competition
Nah, it's not gonna become much more intense. Slight improvement in quality of some of the pool stages, the knockout stages will feature the same teams as it would in the old 24-team format. The best teams in Europe will be there or thereabouts in the same way they would in the old tournament. There's always one group every year which is a bit soft, that'll be over, but most groups will remain the same in terms of quality. In all honesty sorting out the busted seeding system would go further towards making the tournament more intense than changing the number of teams or how they get there.
The real idea and motive is to improve the second tier tournament, which you'd only watch if your team was in it anyway. It is what it is, the second tier tournament- it will never draw much interest from casual fans or be seen as a big draw however much it improves. For example, sports journalists in Italy will completely ignore the European campaigns of Treviso and Zebre in the second tier should they both find themselves there. But if at least one of them is rubbing shoulders with the bigger teams in the main show each year the game will benefit from increased exposure in the Italian press and increased interest which is better both for their competitiveness and for the tournament in general in the long term. It was also give them a chance to keep players in Italy knowing that they have a shot at playing in the biggest club tournament every year.
It's important to have strong second tier but it's also important to make sure we keep the tier 1 tournament both meritocratic and diverse. The balance between those things is off with diversity ahead of meritocracy when it comes to teams like Zebre, but equally the proposal for no automatic qualification puts meritocracy ahead of the diversity that will add appeal to the tournament and will keep professional rugby moving forward in all of the six main countries with professional structures in place.
If this Rugby Champions thing isn't gonna make it clear from the outset that teams from all six nations will feature every year in the main competition it's going to be sad... Seriously, we could have 18 places divided equally between 3 leagues and 2 places set aside to make sure all six nations are represented. Is that really so terrible? Still competitive and 90% of the teams qualify via league placings but every year, each country will have an iron in the fire and therefore the competition will not drop off the radar in the smaller countries.
Unfortunately, the IRFU are about as sharp as a balloon when it comes to negotiating as the Sexton saga proves. I think there are good odds that while we could join a new competition on our own terms now and broker a fair compromise on issues like money and guaranteed participation, instead we'll stay aboard the sinking ship that is the ERC and end up joining the breakaway on worse terms later. Terms that I believe are bad for European rugby.
The real idea and motive is to improve the second tier tournament, which you'd only watch if your team was in it anyway. It is what it is, the second tier tournament- it will never draw much interest from casual fans or be seen as a big draw however much it improves. For example, sports journalists in Italy will completely ignore the European campaigns of Treviso and Zebre in the second tier should they both find themselves there. But if at least one of them is rubbing shoulders with the bigger teams in the main show each year the game will benefit from increased exposure in the Italian press and increased interest which is better both for their competitiveness and for the tournament in general in the long term. It was also give them a chance to keep players in Italy knowing that they have a shot at playing in the biggest club tournament every year.
It's important to have strong second tier but it's also important to make sure we keep the tier 1 tournament both meritocratic and diverse. The balance between those things is off with diversity ahead of meritocracy when it comes to teams like Zebre, but equally the proposal for no automatic qualification puts meritocracy ahead of the diversity that will add appeal to the tournament and will keep professional rugby moving forward in all of the six main countries with professional structures in place.
If this Rugby Champions thing isn't gonna make it clear from the outset that teams from all six nations will feature every year in the main competition it's going to be sad... Seriously, we could have 18 places divided equally between 3 leagues and 2 places set aside to make sure all six nations are represented. Is that really so terrible? Still competitive and 90% of the teams qualify via league placings but every year, each country will have an iron in the fire and therefore the competition will not drop off the radar in the smaller countries.
Unfortunately, the IRFU are about as sharp as a balloon when it comes to negotiating as the Sexton saga proves. I think there are good odds that while we could join a new competition on our own terms now and broker a fair compromise on issues like money and guaranteed participation, instead we'll stay aboard the sinking ship that is the ERC and end up joining the breakaway on worse terms later. Terms that I believe are bad for European rugby.
Last edited by Notch on Sun 22 Sep 2013, 6:12 pm; edited 2 times in total
Notch- Moderator
- Posts : 25635
Join date : 2011-02-10
Age : 36
Location : Belfast
Re: Merged thread euro competition
Children behave. That's what they say when we're togetherThe Saint wrote:You got tired of trolling on other threads then did you?nathan wrote:nice and mature there calling the french and english morons...The Saint wrote:There we go, what it all boils down to. The Celtic & Italian teams will likely say 'shove it up yer ass' rather than risk bankrupting themselves while the rich get richer.Franglo morons wrote:The English and French clubs are also unhappy with the way revenues are split between the three leagues and want to keep a greater share
#hypocrite .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkMFLUXTEwM
Jenifer McLadyboy- Posts : 4764
Join date : 2011-06-30
Re: Merged thread euro competition
Referring to an earlier comment by someone regarding the voting structure of the ERC, is it accurate that the combined vote of the PRO12 unions always outweigh the other participants?
I read recently that the voting is not simply two votes per union. Rather that FFR, RFU, LNR and PRL if they voted together wouldequal actually outweigh the votes of the other four unions/RRW...
There's 18 votes in total
RFU 2.5
PRL 2.5
FFR 1
LNR 4 (recallable by FFR)
WRU 1
RRW 1
IRFU 2
SRU 2
fIR 2
I read recently that the voting is not simply two votes per union. Rather that FFR, RFU, LNR and PRL if they voted together would
There's 18 votes in total
RFU 2.5
PRL 2.5
FFR 1
LNR 4 (recallable by FFR)
WRU 1
RRW 1
IRFU 2
SRU 2
fIR 2
Last edited by Pot Hale on Sun 22 Sep 2013, 7:50 pm; edited 3 times in total
Pot Hale- Posts : 7781
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 62
Location : North East
Re: Merged thread euro competition
Not sure. All I know is that the French have 5 votes.Pot Hale wrote:Referring to an earlier comment by someone regarding the voting structure of the ERC, is it accurate that the combined vote of the PRO12 unions always outweigh the other participants?
I read recently that the voting is not simply two votes per union. Rather that FFR, RFU, LNR and PRL if they voted together would equal the votes of the other four unions...
HammerofThunor- Posts : 10471
Join date : 2011-01-29
Location : Hull, England - Originally Potteries
Re: Merged thread euro competition
5 votes?HammerofThunor wrote:Not sure. All I know is that the French have 5 votes.Pot Hale wrote:Referring to an earlier comment by someone regarding the voting structure of the ERC, is it accurate that the combined vote of the PRO12 unions always outweigh the other participants?
I read recently that the voting is not simply two votes per union. Rather that FFR, RFU, LNR and PRL if they voted together would equal the votes of the other four unions...
My understanding was each of the Six Nations had 2 votes. IRFU, SRU and the FIR have two votes. The RFU, FFR and WRU have voluntarily given one of their votes to the PRL, LNR and RRW respectively and therefore retain one vote each.
Am I incorrect in this?
Notch- Moderator
- Posts : 25635
Join date : 2011-02-10
Age : 36
Location : Belfast
Re: Merged thread euro competition
In all the stuff about Lux getting voted in it was said that the FFR had given the LNR 4 of their 5 votes but pulled them back to make sure Lux got in.
I'll have a look for confirmation
I'll have a look for confirmation
HammerofThunor- Posts : 10471
Join date : 2011-01-29
Location : Hull, England - Originally Potteries
Re: Merged thread euro competition
I assume either one team one vote or one league one vote. That would rectify the situation where a third of the teams hav more than half the votes.butterfingers wrote:I'm not sure how a tournament like this could work.
Who runs this tournament, A Franglo consortium? Who determines structure and payout? And who governs this tournament?
Surely the ERC is in the best place possible to do so, oh hang on the ERC is the problem isn't it, a union run entity!
The PRL and LNR are essentially staging a coup not just over the ERC but their own unions too, if the RFU and FFR agree to this they are all but raising the white flag for the sport as we know it!
Exiledinborders- Posts : 1645
Join date : 2012-03-18
Location : Scottish Borders
Re: Merged thread euro competition
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2010/oct/21/peter-wheeler-european-rugby-cup
This says the PRL have 2.5 of the 18 votes. At a guess the English and French have 5 votes and the other 4 unions have 2 each.
This says the PRL have 2.5 of the 18 votes. At a guess the English and French have 5 votes and the other 4 unions have 2 each.
HammerofThunor- Posts : 10471
Join date : 2011-01-29
Location : Hull, England - Originally Potteries
Re: Merged thread euro competition
Yes. See my post above with voting structure.Notch wrote:5 votes?HammerofThunor wrote:Not sure. All I know is that the French have 5 votes.Pot Hale wrote:Referring to an earlier comment by someone regarding the voting structure of the ERC, is it accurate that the combined vote of the PRO12 unions always outweigh the other participants?
I read recently that the voting is not simply two votes per union. Rather that FFR, RFU, LNR and PRL if they voted together would equal the votes of the other four unions...
My understanding was each of the Six Nations had 2 votes. IRFU, SRU and the FIR have two votes. The RFU, FFR and WRU have voluntarily given one of their votes to the PRL, LNR and RRW respectively and therefore retain one vote each.
Am I incorrect in this?
Last edited by Pot Hale on Sun 22 Sep 2013, 6:42 pm; edited 1 time in total
Pot Hale- Posts : 7781
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 62
Location : North East
Re: Merged thread euro competition
NoPot Hale wrote:Yes.Notch wrote:5 votes?HammerofThunor wrote:Not sure. All I know is that the French have 5 votes.Pot Hale wrote:Referring to an earlier comment by someone regarding the voting structure of the ERC, is it accurate that the combined vote of the PRO12 unions always outweigh the other participants?
I read recently that the voting is not simply two votes per union. Rather that FFR, RFU, LNR and PRL if they voted together would equal the votes of the other four unions...
My understanding was each of the Six Nations had 2 votes. IRFU, SRU and the FIR have two votes. The RFU, FFR and WRU have voluntarily given one of their votes to the PRL, LNR and RRW respectively and therefore retain one vote each.
Am I incorrect in this?
HammerofThunor- Posts : 10471
Join date : 2011-01-29
Location : Hull, England - Originally Potteries
Re: Merged thread euro competition
Hammer you just wrote that PRL have 2.5 of the 18 votes which is correct,HammerofThunor wrote:NoPot Hale wrote:Yes.Notch wrote:5 votes?HammerofThunor wrote:Not sure. All I know is that the French have 5 votes.Pot Hale wrote:Referring to an earlier comment by someone regarding the voting structure of the ERC, is it accurate that the combined vote of the PRO12 unions always outweigh the other participants?
I read recently that the voting is not simply two votes per union. Rather that FFR, RFU, LNR and PRL if they voted together would equal the votes of the other four unions...
My understanding was each of the Six Nations had 2 votes. IRFU, SRU and the FIR have two votes. The RFU, FFR and WRU have voluntarily given one of their votes to the PRL, LNR and RRW respectively and therefore retain one vote each.
Am I incorrect in this?
Eng and Frnace have ten votes, the four have eight - allowing that unions and clubs would align
Pot Hale- Posts : 7781
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 62
Location : North East
Re: Merged thread euro competition
Sorry I'm an idiot. I thought Notch wrote Am I correct in this.
Sorry again.
Sorry again.
HammerofThunor- Posts : 10471
Join date : 2011-01-29
Location : Hull, England - Originally Potteries
Re: Merged thread euro competition
Bill Beaumont and his pals will be getting all sorts of freebies on top of their normally bottomless supplies of G&Ts and World of Pleasuredome trip experiences.Pot Hale wrote:Hammer you just wrote that PRL have 2.5 of the 18 votes which is correct,HammerofThunor wrote:NoPot Hale wrote:Yes.Notch wrote:5 votes?HammerofThunor wrote:Not sure. All I know is that the French have 5 votes.Pot Hale wrote:Referring to an earlier comment by someone regarding the voting structure of the ERC, is it accurate that the combined vote of the PRO12 unions always outweigh the other participants?
I read recently that the voting is not simply two votes per union. Rather that FFR, RFU, LNR and PRL if they voted together would equal the votes of the other four unions...
My understanding was each of the Six Nations had 2 votes. IRFU, SRU and the FIR have two votes. The RFU, FFR and WRU have voluntarily given one of their votes to the PRL, LNR and RRW respectively and therefore retain one vote each.
Am I incorrect in this?
Eng and Frnace have ten votes, the four have eight - allowing that unions and clubs would align
Portnoy's Complaint- Posts : 3498
Join date : 2012-10-03
Age : 74
Location : Felixstowe
Page 1 of 21 • 1, 2, 3 ... 11 ... 21
Similar topics
» Merged thread euro competition pt 2
» The New European Cup Thread (Merged)
» Merged thread. Wales U18, SA U18, England U18, France U18 tournament in SA.
» The Scottish International Rugby Thread
» Euro club competition: Rankings and seedings
» The New European Cup Thread (Merged)
» Merged thread. Wales U18, SA U18, England U18, France U18 tournament in SA.
» The Scottish International Rugby Thread
» Euro club competition: Rankings and seedings
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Rugby Union :: Club Rugby
Page 1 of 21
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum