My Top 50 boxers of all time list

First topic message reminder :

1. Floyd Mayweather Jr
2. Sugar Ray Robinson
3. Muhammad Ali
4. Harry Greb
5. Henry Armstrong
6. Sugar Ray Leonard
7. Benny Leonard
8. Willie Pep
9. Tommy Hearns
10. Pernell Whitaker
11. Lennox Lewis
12. Joe Louis
13. Sam Langford
14. Gene Tunney
15. Ezzard Charles
16. Eder Jofre
17. Stanley Ketchel
18. Jack Johnson
19. Joe Gans
20. Bob Fitzsimmons
21. Roberto Duran
22. Bernard Hopkins
23. Marvin Hagler
24. Jimmy Wilde
25. Manny Pacquiao
26. Ricardo Lopez
27. Archie Moore
28. Barney Ross
29. Tony Canzoneri
30. Oscar De La Hoya
31. Roy Jones Junior
33. Alexis Arguello
33. Aaron Pryor
34. Mickey Walker
35. Sandy Saddler
36. Jake LaMotta
37. Evander Holyfield
38. Carlos Monzon
39. Larry Holmes
40. George Foreman
41. Julio Cesar Chavez
42. Charley Burley
43. Jack Dempsey
44. Michael Spinks
45. Ted Lewis
46. Joe Frazier
47. Salvador Sanchez
48. Erik Morales
49. Don Curry
50. Juan Manuel Marquez

Feel free to criticise my list. Add who you want on the list and who you dont. If im convinced I might change the list. You can also produce your own top 50 list.

Well said Jeff, and to echo that I'd just like to say that if you as an individual try to stick by the house rules, then you can be assured that anyone breaking them will be pulled up about it.

Not a problem Fists, do get bored of opening a thread to see nearly everyone descend into name calling, calls for people to be banned and worst of all use of the word owned, FFS are we all 12, people will hold differing opinions, that is the whole idea of a forum.

The word 'owned' and 'stalker' really grate with me. Seems to come from the same people too...as you say, the purpose of a forum is to 'mass debate' (see what I did there?) so a clash of opinions is likely, it doesn't mean that you have owned someone, and anything is acceptable providing you can back that up with relevant facts and explanation.

Emphasise being on relevant facts and explanation Fists, get tiresome to see something proclaimed with no reasoning behind and then to get accused of being 'owned' is just grand

I feel your pain, Ghosty.

Stalker also gets on my goat, with Megan Fox phoning and emailing me all the time come on here to get away from all that nonsense.

I think rowley should be banned because he keeps getting "owned"

Sir. badgerhands wrote:I think rowley should be banned because he keeps getting "owned"

Totally agree the man's a buffoon

All joking aside, the threads I see where people are being "owned" called "stalkers" or shouts of "ban him" are being raised I avoid like the plague.

This is a great forum with alot of very in the know posters and it would be ashame to see it descend into the type of backbiting and name calling that 606 used to descend into.

rowley wrote:I personally think the forum would run far better if people stopped asking for people to be banned and worried about observing the house rules themselves. From what I can see the mods, on the boxing boards doa decent job of keeping on top of everything on here so personally would trust them to carry on doing so, but that's just my opinion.

You should be banned for an opinion like that jeff...

Balti you know the forum would be a worse place for it, not sure on the back of losing both me and D4 the place would ever recover.

rowley wrote:Balti you know the forum would be a worse place for it, not sure on the back of losing both me and D4 the place would ever recover.

Yeah, I know...I'm having counselling for that 'loss' as it is... *koff*

After being on the receiving end of an all-expenses week-long trip to Siberia I don't wish it on anyone, so long as they can pull theirselves together and stop being a WUM. Mentioning no names

coxy0001 wrote:Fists

When signing up does his IP address also come through on the registry? When configuring forums on the CMS framework i use the email bounce back to the main admin can contain the users IP address if they want that field in there

Duplicate = alias time.

As far as we are aware, PBF has no other identity at v2.

Does Coxy ever have anything positive to add????

Oozing with bitterness..

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:Does Coxy ever have anything positive to add????

Oozing with bitterness..

He speaks very highly of you...

Does Coxy ever have anything positive to add????

Oozing with bitterness..
.............................................
Of course you could say the same about you. Merging with the laughing stock of 606v2 and an ultimate WUM, you always have a controversial comment or 8

Young_Towzer wrote:Does Coxy ever have anything positive to add????

Oozing with bitterness..
.............................................
Of course you could say the same about you. Merging with the laughing stock of 606v2 and an ultimate WUM, you always have a controversial comment or 8

I reported that stalker although I cant recall Truss merging with you!

I reported that stalker although I cant recall Truss merging with you!
..............................
scroll up and see what the Mods have said, they are sick of your boring 'stalker' comments. Why would anyone want to stalk a lovestruck fan? it's what you call disagreeing with you. I don't see you taking note though, wum's never do. Keep being obsessed with Mayweather & Cotto haha, ciao. . You would have to be the bonafied laughing stock, everyone says they can't take you serious haha, mind you we never can take bias serious. the Marquez 'destroying' Cotto @147 comment was beyond laughing stock material

Young_Towzer wrote:I reported that stalker although I cant recall Truss merging with you!
..............................
scroll up and see what the Mods have said, there sick of your boring 'stalker' comments, i don't see you taking note though, wum's never do. Keep being obsessed with Mayweather & Cotto haha, ciao.

https://www.606v2.com/t7773p50-marquez-no-mayweather-jr-mistakes-with-pacquiao

I wonder who is the laughing stalk...Not my fault you keep stalking me on 606v2 isit?

You still obsessed with me I see but I wont reply back to you on this thread because I know how badly you need to have the last word.

Do you two never get bored of having the same argument over and over again because i've sure as hell got bored of seeing it and will respectfully ask you both to drop it straight away before it escalates any further

Guys, I can understand that sometimes issues get argued passionately, tempers flare and all Hell breaks loose. When that happens, I think you'd agree that I'm normally pretty patient in trying to restore calm.

However, that's a different thing altogether from these ongoing feuds and biting at each other. To be honest, it's pretty juvenile and I'm fed up with it.

If having these little digs at each other is what rocks your boats then do it via PM and leave the threads to boxing.

If it carries on I shall be deleting comments, and when I begin to delete them by the sackload the other mod and admin team members are going to want to know why. If they call for blood you cannot possibly expect that I can find a defence for this disruptive behaviour so, for everybody's sake

CUT IT OUT.

I wonder who is the laughing stalk...Not my fault you keep stalking me on 606v2 isit?

You still obsessed with me I see but I wont reply back to you on this thread because I know how badly you need to have the last word.
........................
haha stalking you when you look at an article for comments made/referring to me? haha, sums you up that

HumanWindmill wrote:Guys, I can understand that sometimes issues get argued passionately, tempers flare and all Hell breaks loose. When that happens, I think you'd agree that I'm normally pretty patient in trying to restore calm.

However, that's a different thing altogether from these ongoing feuds and biting at each other. To be honest, it's pretty juvenile and I'm fed up with it.

If having these little digs at each other is what rocks your boats then do it via PM and leave the threads to boxing.

If it carries on I shall be deleting comments, and when I begin to delete them by the sackload the other mod and admin team members are going to want to know why. If they call for blood you cannot possibly expect that I can find a defence for this disruptive behaviour so, for everybody's sake

CUT IT OUT.

Windy, i've never bitten to the guy in my life and won't start now mate. He's been warned by fists of fury for his stalking comments and is doing it again now, the guy's saying i stalk him then brings a link up to an article i've commented on and people saying something to me? talk about stalking then saying i am doing it lol. We all know he's a WUM. People might not agree with me, which is fair enough by me but i aint bias which is what he is. He's just a bit over aggressive and a wum, not to worry i'm sure he'll pipedown and save the mods work. Many posters think he's a wum, and i'm one of them many.

Lets not get into all this he said she said malarky YT, i'm pretty sure you're better than that so just drop the matter here and now, it's fairly obvious you and PBF are going to collide on most issues but for the sake of the everyone else especially Windy who must be sick to death of sorting out issues on here ignore eachother from now on. Simple solution but an effective one

Lets not get into all this he said she said malarky YT, i'm pretty sure you're better than that so just drop the matter here and now, it's fairly obvious you and PBF are going to collide on most issues but for the sake of the everyone else especially Windy who must be sick to death of sorting out issues on here ignore eachother from now on. Simple solution but an effective one
.....................................
i agree with you imperial