Union Cane's Prediction League - Season 1

Union Cane's Prediction League

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Week Twelve Results

1. Floyd Mayweather Jr v. Victor Ortiz (12)	Floyd Mayweather KO4 (EKO)
2. Erik Morales v. Pablo Cesar Cano (12)	Erik Morales RTD10 (LKO)
3. Jessie Vargas v. Josesito Lopez (10)	Jessie Vargas SD
4. Anthony Crolla v. Juan Montiel (8)	Anthony Crolla SD
5. Saul Alvarez v. Alfonso Gomez (12)	Saul Alvarez TKO6 (EKO)
6. Tyson Fury v. Nicolai Firtha (12)	Tyson Fury TKO5 (EKO)
7. Ryan Greene v. Willie Thompson (10)
8. Willie Casey v. Daniel Kodjo Sassou (8)	Willie Casey TKO8 (LKO)
9. Stephen Smith v. Lee Selby (12)	Lee Selby TKO8 (LKO)
10. Paul Smith v. Paul Samuels (8)	Paul Smith TKO1 (EKO)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Week Twelve Review

Dirty, cheap shot or opportunistic flash of brilliance?

Ultimately it matters not, the record books show KO4 and Mayweather moves one win away from emulating the great Joe Calzaghe.

Elsewhere there was more great entertainment from Tyson Fury, mixed fortunes for the Smith brothers and a controversial Vegas undercard, but the fight we are all interested in is the battle for the inaugural Union Cane's Prediction League title between coxy0001 and The genius of PBF.

The gauntlet was laid down by coxy0001 with an impressive haul of 12 points, however it wasn't quite enough, the boasts and bravado sounding decidedly hollow now.

Gentlemen, your Champion...

The genius of PBF



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final League Table

Position	User Name	Weekly Score	HWS*	Total Score
1	The genius of PBF	16	-	116
2	coxy0001	12	-	111
3	Knowsit17	10	-	106
4	rowley	13	13	103
5	Union Cane	12	14	103
6	Dazstarr	14	13	100
7	ian_jamsie	15	12	100
8	Jdizzle	10	-	99
9	Mind the windows Tino.	11	-	98
10	alma	13	-	95
11	compelling and rich	9	-	93
12	sodhat	10	-	92
13	JJJohnson	16	-	91
14	Eyetoldyouso	15	-	90
15	The Galveston Giant	11	-	89
16	Il Gialloblu	10	-	88
17	TopHat24/7	15	-	86
18	Michaels, Sean	12	-	81
19	WelshDevilRob	21	-	77
20	bhb001	11	-	75
------	--------------------	----------	----------	----------
21	eddyfightfan	17	-	74
22	licence_007	0	-	57
23	prettyboykev	22	-	56
24	Reborn-DeeMcK-Reborn	16	-	49
25	DavidBlunkettsuppercut	10	-	47
26	Boxtthis	0	-	36
27	Super D Boon	0	-	31
28	TRUSSMAN66	0	-	29
29	PPVxHOTTY	0	-	28
=30	Sugar Boy Sweetie	0	10	27
=30	Day V Lately	0	10	27
32	Dominic Dicoco	0	-	24
=34	Solder_of_Fortune	0	8	23
=34	Steffan	0	8	23
35	d260005p	0	-	19
36	Scottrf	0	-	17
37	Lumbering_Jack	0	-	16
38	wow_junky	0	-	14
39	spencerclarke	0	-	9
40	wheelchair1991	0	-	8
41	King Raoh	0	-	4

*HWS - Highest individual Weekly Score is used to separate those tied on points, unless I am involved in which case (to avoid accusations of corruption) the Lowest Highest Weekly Score takes precedence.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predictor of the Week Award

Week One	Knowsit17
Week Two	Knowsit17
Week Three	The genius of PBF
Week Four	Sugar Boy Sweetie
Week Five	Il Gialloblu
Week Six	coxy0001
Week Seven	ian_jamsie
Week Eight	eddyfightfan
Week Nine	coxy0001
Week Ten	JJJohnson
Week Eleven	Michaels, Sean
Week Twelve	prettyboykev

Union Cane wrote:My 'review' section each week shows a deep understanding and knowledge of the fight game, but nobody bothers to read that bit do they.

Paul McCloskey should change his name to McLucky,
Very thought provoking that.........

Michaels, Sean wrote:

Union Cane wrote:My 'review' section each week shows a deep understanding and knowledge of the fight game, but nobody bothers to read that bit do they.

Paul McCloskey should change his name to McLucky,
Very thought provoking that.........

Umm, I was thinking the same myself Union. Despite the fact you have been truly ghastly towards me today, I am happy to admit you are usually quite amusing. That one was way below the standard of your usual work.

In fact, dare I say it, a bit Towzeresque.

Noted.

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Michaels, Sean wrote:

Union Cane wrote:My 'review' section each week shows a deep understanding and knowledge of the fight game, but nobody bothers to read that bit do they.

Paul McCloskey should change his name to McLucky,
Very thought provoking that.........

Umm, I was thinking the same myself Union. Despite the fact you have been truly ghastly towards me today, I am happy to admit you are usually quite amusing. That one was way below the standard of your usual work.

In fact, dare I say it, a bit Towzeresque.

Nowhere near enough L*L's or references to someone getting destroyed or offers to meet up for him to give you a hiding to approach towseresque standards

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Michaels, Sean wrote:

Union Cane wrote:My 'review' section each week shows a deep understanding and knowledge of the fight game, but nobody bothers to read that bit do they.

Paul McCloskey should change his name to McLucky,
Very thought provoking that.........

Umm, I was thinking the same myself Union. Despite the fact you have been truly ghastly towards me today, I am happy to admit you are usually quite amusing. That one was way below the standard of your usual work.

In fact, dare I say it, a bit Towzeresque.

LOLz

ONE THOUSAND REPLIES!

rowley wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Michaels, Sean wrote:

Union Cane wrote:My 'review' section each week shows a deep understanding and knowledge of the fight game, but nobody bothers to read that bit do they.

Paul McCloskey should change his name to McLucky,
Very thought provoking that.........

Umm, I was thinking the same myself Union. Despite the fact you have been truly ghastly towards me today, I am happy to admit you are usually quite amusing. That one was way below the standard of your usual work.

In fact, dare I say it, a bit Towzeresque.

Nowhere near enough L*L's or references to someone getting destroyed or offers to meet up for him to give you a hiding to approach towseresque standards

Did YT ever offer to someone up for a scrap then? I must have missed that one, not saying I would have offered him a fight or anything.

I remember being a "reader" on the old site and someone offering Union a fight over t'internet as well. Can't remember his/her name but they kept calling him spineless or something like that.

For the record, I think Union bottled it.

This is the 1k post

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:I remember being a "reader" on the old site and someone offering Union a fight over t'internet as well. Can't remember his/her name but they kept calling him spineless or something like that.

For the record, I think Union bottled it.

Could have been any one of many, I used to have a propensity for rubbing people up the wrong way.

Union Cane wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:I remember being a "reader" on the old site and someone offering Union a fight over t'internet as well. Can't remember his/her name but they kept calling him spineless or something like that.

For the record, I think Union bottled it.

Could have been any one of many, I used to have a propensity for rubbing people up the wrong way.

Were you my old P.E teacher?

...and the circle is complete.

Hearing that McCall - Cooper could have been cancelled last month, not sure if that's true or not.

The Galveston Giant wrote:Hearing that McCall - Cooper could have been cancelled last month, not sure if that's true or not.

You could be right GG, I can't find anything anywhere. I don't think the IBU are going to email me back either, so sod it, fight is void.

Does anyone ever make predictions on here anymore?

bhb001 wrote:Does anyone ever make predictions on here anymore?

That's very unfair bhb. Not only have I made mine for the final week, I made them for the following week without even knowing the fights.

Apology accepted.

McCall and Cooper can b0ll0cks, fight is void, PotW etc updated.

Union Cane wrote:McCall and Cooper can b0ll0cks, fight is void, PotW etc updated.

Please give PotW to me Union. Change your mind, it's your tournament. Post of the day on Friday followed by this would be monumental. It would be a small stick to beat jeff with as well.

I'll do that thing you like?

[quote="Mind the windows Tino."]

Union Cane wrote:
I'll do that thing you like?

I believe it is banned in the UK as well as all states of the US bar Texas.

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Union Cane wrote:McCall and Cooper can b0ll0cks, fight is void, PotW etc updated.

Please give PotW to me Union. Change your mind, it's your tournament. Post of the day on Friday followed by this would be monumental. It would be a small stick to beat jeff with as well.

I'll do that thing you like?

Let him have it Union, simple things please simple minds as the old saying goes.

Please give PotW to me Union

Think he meant to say "Please give it to me whilst watching POV" judging by the

I'll do that thing you like?

comment

I've already give it Michaels though.

Tino, you can have next week's.

(Provided that you score loads more points than anyone else.)

rowley wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Union Cane wrote:McCall and Cooper can b0ll0cks, fight is void, PotW etc updated.

Please give PotW to me Union. Change your mind, it's your tournament. Post of the day on Friday followed by this would be monumental. It would be a small stick to beat jeff with as well.

I'll do that thing you like?

Let him have it Union, simple things please simple minds as the old saying goes.

We really have developed a love/hate relationship haven't we. I love you and you hate me. It's a shame that it's come to this but such is life.

And Sean, you really are a tryer aren't you! That pesky quote function is still proving problematic.

I was again trying to be nice, seems obvious from the neediness that leapt of the screen when discussing the predictor of the week you have not really acheived anything of note in your life or won anything so thought this would be something of an ego boost for you.

At least you know about boxing Tino, which is more than can be said for me.

I "know sack", whatever that is.

Get in. Poster of the week!!!!!

I now just need to get Windy back on side and pick up a post of the day award and my rehablitation is complete.

Look out for 'Michaels: Hero to zero and back again' in selected book stores over the coming months.

*It might have been that I "don't know sack" actually, whatever that is, I can't remember.

You called me simple. How can that possibly be nice. Thick and simple are the two names you've called me today.

I am going to rise above it.

I did come first (leave it Coxy) in the 100 metres backstroke at our school swimming gala actually.

The race was over 200 metres though.

Michaels, Sean wrote:Get in. Poster of the week!!!!!

It's Predictor of the Week, not Poster.

And you got it for being crud.

Union Cane wrote:

Michaels, Sean wrote:Get in. Poster of the week!!!!!

It's Predictor of the Week, not Poster.

And you got it for being crud.

I think Union has the painters in today.

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:You called me simple. How can that possibly be nice. Thick and simple are the two names you've called me today.

I am going to rise above it.

I did come first (leave it Coxy) in the 100 metres backstroke at our school swimming gala actually.

The race was over 200 metres though.

I was our house table tennis champion at school, thats probably where you've heard the name before. All good natured you understand, trust me you'll know if I don't like you

Michaels, Sean wrote:

Union Cane wrote:

Michaels, Sean wrote:Get in. Poster of the week!!!!!

It's Predictor of the Week, not Poster.

And you got it for being crud.

I think Union has the painters in today.

Probably because he's still waiting on the results to come in from the 4 rounder to come in from Spluffintheholezia that is delaying his cup prediction thing.

Michaels, Sean wrote:I think Union has the painters in today.

There are those that would be (creepily) grateful to receive such an honour you know.

Michaels, Sean wrote:

Union Cane wrote:

Michaels, Sean wrote:Get in. Poster of the week!!!!!

It's Predictor of the Week, not Poster.

And you got it for being crud.

I think Union has the painters in today.

Think he has the whole DIY SOS team in actually.

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Michaels, Sean wrote:

Union Cane wrote:

Michaels, Sean wrote:Get in. Poster of the week!!!!!

It's Predictor of the Week, not Poster.

And you got it for being crud.

I think Union has the painters in today.

Think he has the whole DIY SOS team in actually.

The what?

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:Think he has the whole DIY SOS team in actually.

They wouldn't come, as my wife isn't dead, my children aren't disabled and I haven't got a three legged dog.

Union Cane wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:Think he has the whole DIY SOS team in actually.

They wouldn't come, as my wife isn't dead, my children aren't disabled and I haven't got a three legged dog.

Your wife is also not real which probably counts against you.

rowley wrote:

Union Cane wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:Think he has the whole DIY SOS team in actually.

They wouldn't come, as my wife isn't dead, my children aren't disabled and I haven't got a three legged dog.

Your wife is also not real which probably counts against you.

Good point.

Oh, and I'm not lazy enough to let my house turn into a sh!thole and I'm not on benefits.

coxy0001 wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Michaels, Sean wrote:

Union Cane wrote:

Michaels, Sean wrote:Get in. Poster of the week!!!!!

It's Predictor of the Week, not Poster.

And you got it for being crud.

I think Union has the painters in today.

Think he has the whole DIY SOS team in actually.

The what?

Coxy, you are young and carefree, you won't have watched it.

Stick to downloading midget porn on your laptop.

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

coxy0001 wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Michaels, Sean wrote:

Union Cane wrote:

Michaels, Sean wrote:Get in. Poster of the week!!!!!

It's Predictor of the Week, not Poster.

And you got it for being crud.

I think Union has the painters in today.

Think he has the whole DIY SOS team in actually.

The what?

Coxy, you are young and carefree, you won't have watched it.

Stick to downloading midget porn on your laptop.

Moved on to fat grandmas actually

And 29 is hardly young, certainly not carefree (women are evil)

coxy0001 wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

coxy0001 wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Michaels, Sean wrote:

Union Cane wrote:

Michaels, Sean wrote:Get in. Poster of the week!!!!!

It's Predictor of the Week, not Poster.

And you got it for being crud.

I think Union has the painters in today.

Think he has the whole DIY SOS team in actually.

The what?

Coxy, you are young and carefree, you won't have watched it.

Stick to downloading midget porn on your laptop.

Moved on to fat grandmas actually

And 29 is hardly young, certainly not carefree (women are evil)

You're 29?

Wonders never cease.

I know, so much intellect makes me seem older

I'm sure he was 29 on the old 606 too.

In 2008.

Union Cane wrote:I'm sure he was 29 on the old 606 too.

In 2008.

Turning 30 in January, joys.

So you have 1 birthday every 3 years?

No, i was 25 when Jan 1st came along in 2008.

As you're all men of the world, do you think it is inappropriate to shake your fiancee's best (female) mate's hand upon meeting her for the first time? I got ridiculed for it at the weekend. Admittedly she did go for the hug / kiss on the cheek combo first.

Michaels, Sean wrote:As you're all men of the world, do you think it is inappropriate to shake your fiancee's best (female) mate's hand upon meeting her for the first time? I got ridiculed for it at the weekend. Admittedly she did go for the hug / kiss on the cheek combo first.

You have a fiancee?

Michaels, Sean wrote:As you're all men of the world, do you think it is inappropriate to shake your fiancee's best (female) mate's hand upon meeting her for the first time? I got ridiculed for it at the weekend. Admittedly she did go for the hug / kiss on the cheek combo first.

You actually know real women?

Union Cane wrote:

Michaels, Sean wrote:As you're all men of the world, do you think it is inappropriate to shake your fiancee's best (female) mate's hand upon meeting her for the first time? I got ridiculed for it at the weekend. Admittedly she did go for the hug / kiss on the cheek combo first.

You have a fiancee?

If we're willing to believe you have a wife I'll buy that Sean has a fiancee. Shaking hands is better than the kiss on both cheeks, that kind of thing simply does not fly in Yorkshire