Haye ready for comeback!

First topic message reminder :

Hi everyone. Hope Christmqs has been a good one. Here is just a little something for some of the Haye doubters out there to ponder.

Former two-division world champion David Haye (26-2, 24KOs) has assured his fans that they haven't seen the last of him. The 34-year-old boxer is promising to return in style. Haye has been inactive since July 2012, when he knocked out Dereck Chisora.

Since the win over Chisora, injuries forced him to withdraw from planned fight with Manuel Charr and two scheduled dates with Tyson Fury. The second injury promoted Haye to get right shoulder surgery and says doctors advised me to retire.

"The shoulder is fixed, for me that was the most important thing. I didn't want to rush an announcement [on my comeback], have a set back, and have to have another six months out," Haye told The Independent. "I'm punching harder than before now because of the rehab. My right is now stronger than my left and is stronger than before surgery. Trust me, 2015 is the return of 'The Hayemaker', I'll be bigger, better, faster, stronger, with a new plan."

This is exactly what I have been expecting. I think after a year of disappointment 2015 is going to be a HUGE one for Haye. He is fit again and already plotting his comeback. We havent seen the last of the Hyemaker! Expect big things in 2015!

hampo171 wrote:

hayemaker wrote:

DuransHorse wrote:

hayemaker wrote:Heavyweight champion of the world and only lost two out of god knows how many fights. Some of you lot should take it up if you call that failing miserably.

But yet you criticise the unbeaten Wilder with 32 wins all by KO? I don't get you. You understand why that stat is crud but handily can't do the same with Valuevs record.  That's a good skill in agreements, play dumb.

Er I am asking how a boxer who was heavyweight champion and only lost two fights was a miserable failure. Did I call Wilder a miserable failure? I dont think so.

Without going back through the thread, I'd wager you've called him a bum. Valuev was manouvered away from every tough challenge, up until Haye who he couldn't avoid. Go look at his record, there are no names on there, he beat an old Ruiz twice, an old and well past his prime Holyfield, before losing to Haye. He is not a great fighter, and for someone with his dimensions (height, weight and reach) he was woefully unskilled.

How much do you want to wager then?

hayemaker wrote:

hampo171 wrote:Jesus H Christ, do you listen to yourself. There are plenty of people who post on this board that have forgotten more about boxing than you know at this point in time, try listening to them rather than throwing a strop when they don't agree.

People are talking rubbish when they call Valuev a miserable failure and Haye not a world class heavyweight. Simple as.

How would you rate Norton, Young, Johnson or Jeffries as Heavyweights?

Good God almighty, how much more of this cheapjack BS does one have to endure? Why is this rubbish clogging up the upper reaches of the board when so much more relevant and interesting discussion is forced to toil in its miserable shadow?

This is all about a man who has had one fight in the past three and a half years and is a boxer in the same way that Richard Branson is an astronaut - mostly in his own mind and in his spare time. The man weighs around 15 stone, so you'd imagine that he might be a good hitter, just as a midget makes a decent fist of being short. In fact, Haye does have a reasonable heavyweight dig, so long as he can conserve the energy to throw it. In general, his propensity to throw no more than a dozen shots a round on average ensures that he will probably always fall short against a bigger heavyweight who knows what he's doing, even allowing for the benighted  era of big men with which we are saddled.

It's more than enough. It would be good to see the single-issue OP try to express an opinion on another subject - dry stone-walling, for example. Failing that, could someone in authority not drop this post into the stew of pus-addled poison where it belongs and do likewise with every subsequent post about David Haye until he at least condescends to step between the ropes of a professional boxing ring again, this time accoutred for battle? It would make the business of tuning into this board a whole lot more pleasant and maybe even guarantee a bit more interest from some proper posters (Manos, Colonial Lion, Jimmy Stuart, etc etc), whose names have been sadly missing in action for far too long.

Actually, I merely picked up your complete dismissal of Wilder as a Haye opponent. No credit at all but Valuev, well he was a great champion, only 2 losses don't you know!!

hayemaker wrote:

hampo171 wrote:

hayemaker wrote:

DuransHorse wrote:

hayemaker wrote:Heavyweight champion of the world and only lost two out of god knows how many fights. Some of you lot should take it up if you call that failing miserably.

But yet you criticise the unbeaten Wilder with 32 wins all by KO? I don't get you. You understand why that stat is crud but handily can't do the same with Valuevs record.  That's a good skill in agreements, play dumb.

Er I am asking how a boxer who was heavyweight champion and only lost two fights was a miserable failure. Did I call Wilder a miserable failure? I dont think so.

Without going back through the thread, I'd wager you've called him a bum. Valuev was manouvered away from every tough challenge, up until Haye who he couldn't avoid. Go look at his record, there are no names on there, he beat an old Ruiz twice, an old and well past his prime Holyfield, before losing to Haye. He is not a great fighter, and for someone with his dimensions (height, weight and reach) he was woefully unskilled.

How much do you want to wager then?

I do love your anger, why are you so angry?

DuransHorse wrote:Actually, I merely picked up your complete dismissal of Wilder as a Haye opponent. No credit at all but Valuev, well he was a great champion, only 2 losses don't you know!!

You are the one calling him a miserable failure mate. Pull on a pair of gloves and show him how its done eh?

I said Wilder would be an easy nights work for Haye - which he would. You are out there accusing boxers with only two losses and a heavyweight championship a miserable failure. Dont try put words in my mouth when you are spouting rubbish.

hayemaker wrote:

DuransHorse wrote:Actually, I merely picked up your complete dismissal of Wilder as a Haye opponent. No credit at all but Valuev, well he was a great champion, only 2 losses don't you know!!

You are the one calling him a miserable failure mate. Pull on a pair of gloves and show him how its done eh?

I said Wilder would be an easy nights work for Haye - which he would. You are out there accusing boxers with only two losses and a heavyweight championship a miserable failure. Dont try put words in my mouth when you are spouting rubbish.

You said wilder was "an easy win for Haye". Why? Stats mean a lot don't they? That's a better record than Hayes then.

hampo171 wrote:

hayemaker wrote:

hampo171 wrote:

hayemaker wrote:

DuransHorse wrote:

hayemaker wrote:Heavyweight champion of the world and only lost two out of god knows how many fights. Some of you lot should take it up if you call that failing miserably.

But yet you criticise the unbeaten Wilder with 32 wins all by KO? I don't get you. You understand why that stat is crud but handily can't do the same with Valuevs record.  That's a good skill in agreements, play dumb.

Er I am asking how a boxer who was heavyweight champion and only lost two fights was a miserable failure. Did I call Wilder a miserable failure? I dont think so.

Without going back through the thread, I'd wager you've called him a bum. Valuev was manouvered away from every tough challenge, up until Haye who he couldn't avoid. Go look at his record, there are no names on there, he beat an old Ruiz twice, an old and well past his prime Holyfield, before losing to Haye. He is not a great fighter, and for someone with his dimensions (height, weight and reach) he was woefully unskilled.

How much do you want to wager then?

I do love your anger, why are you so angry?

Seeing how you jumped all over my posts demanding I prove you were a hater and blitzing me with private messanges ordering to me to do this and that I think its only fair that you back up some of your stuff as well.

Drop the BS it's getting tiresome, you are not quantifying or qualifying any of your statements in the slightest, repeating the same statistic isn't going to make Valuev anything more than dreadfully average.

hayemaker wrote:

DuransHorse wrote:Actually, I merely picked up your complete dismissal of Wilder as a Haye opponent. No credit at all but Valuev, well he was a great champion, only 2 losses don't you know!!

You are the one calling him a miserable failure mate. Pull on a pair of gloves and show him how its done eh?

I said Wilder would be an easy nights work for Haye - which he would. You are out there accusing boxers with only two losses and a heavyweight championship a miserable failure. Dont try put words in my mouth when you are spouting rubbish.

News flash, Valuev was a protected fighter gifted a belt and decisions.

hayemaker wrote:

hampo171 wrote:

hayemaker wrote:

hampo171 wrote:

hayemaker wrote:

DuransHorse wrote:

hayemaker wrote:Heavyweight champion of the world and only lost two out of god knows how many fights. Some of you lot should take it up if you call that failing miserably.

But yet you criticise the unbeaten Wilder with 32 wins all by KO? I don't get you. You understand why that stat is crud but handily can't do the same with Valuevs record.  That's a good skill in agreements, play dumb.

Er I am asking how a boxer who was heavyweight champion and only lost two fights was a miserable failure. Did I call Wilder a miserable failure? I dont think so.

Without going back through the thread, I'd wager you've called him a bum. Valuev was manouvered away from every tough challenge, up until Haye who he couldn't avoid. Go look at his record, there are no names on there, he beat an old Ruiz twice, an old and well past his prime Holyfield, before losing to Haye. He is not a great fighter, and for someone with his dimensions (height, weight and reach) he was woefully unskilled.

How much do you want to wager then?

I do love your anger, why are you so angry?

Seeing how you jumped all over my posts demanding I prove you were a hater and blitzing me with private messanges ordering to me to do this and that I think its only fair that you back up some of your stuff as well.

I've said nothing in those pms that I wouldn't say in this thread, however I thought you may have some maturity and react differently in a pm, I was clearly wrong and now realise I dealing with an immature person who can't stand to have anyone stand against him. Sad really.

DuransHorse wrote:

hayemaker wrote:

DuransHorse wrote:Actually, I merely picked up your complete dismissal of Wilder as a Haye opponent. No credit at all but Valuev, well he was a great champion, only 2 losses don't you know!!

You are the one calling him a miserable failure mate. Pull on a pair of gloves and show him how its done eh?

I said Wilder would be an easy nights work for Haye - which he would. You are out there accusing boxers with only two losses and a heavyweight championship a miserable failure. Dont try put words in my mouth when you are spouting rubbish.

You said wilder was "an easy win for Haye". Why? Stats mean a lot don't they? That's a better record than Hayes then.

Sorry could you stop trying backtrack all over the place.

Its pretty simple - you called Valuev a miserable failure of a boxer. I think someone who has won the heavyweight championship and only lost two fights to be called a miserable failure is a bit of a joke.

How about dreadfully average? Or woefully unskilled?

I'm off to bed but before I go, I'd just like to say, Haye is actually my favourite Heavy. He's a let down but I'm a fan none the less. Just can't stand these fluffer types on boxing forums. Wrong industry mate.

hampo171 wrote:How about dreadfully average? Or woefully unskilled?

Yup, apologies. That's a better description. Cheers.

hampo171 wrote:

hayemaker wrote:

hampo171 wrote:

hayemaker wrote:

hampo171 wrote:

hayemaker wrote:

DuransHorse wrote:

hayemaker wrote:Heavyweight champion of the world and only lost two out of god knows how many fights. Some of you lot should take it up if you call that failing miserably.

But yet you criticise the unbeaten Wilder with 32 wins all by KO? I don't get you. You understand why that stat is crud but handily can't do the same with Valuevs record.  That's a good skill in agreements, play dumb.

Er I am asking how a boxer who was heavyweight champion and only lost two fights was a miserable failure. Did I call Wilder a miserable failure? I dont think so.

Without going back through the thread, I'd wager you've called him a bum. Valuev was manouvered away from every tough challenge, up until Haye who he couldn't avoid. Go look at his record, there are no names on there, he beat an old Ruiz twice, an old and well past his prime Holyfield, before losing to Haye. He is not a great fighter, and for someone with his dimensions (height, weight and reach) he was woefully unskilled.

How much do you want to wager then?

I do love your anger, why are you so angry?

Seeing how you jumped all over my posts demanding I prove you were a hater and blitzing me with private messanges ordering to me to do this and that I think its only fair that you back up some of your stuff as well.

I've said nothing in those pms that I wouldn't say in this thread, however I thought you may have some maturity and react differently in a pm, I was clearly wrong and now realise I dealing with an immature person who can't stand to have anyone stand against him. Sad really.

Speak for yourself there - you seem to be the one losing the plot with all these pms mate. Is your level of maturity posting a laughing face after a post of someone having a pop at me? No, I get it, Im to blame. Me and David Haye.

Sorry you're right, I shouldn't laugh at posts. I'm so sorry. I give up, you've made yourself fair game for people to take the michael out of in this thread and as they say, you reap what you sow.

Haye maker. Klitschko isn't rubbish. Value got beaten by chagaev ruiz evander holyfields grandma before Haye fought him. Ergo he's Poopie relative to most other heavies even in this poor era

And captain your angry posts are probably equally pleasant to me as the feelings provoking them are unpleasant to you.

Hayemaker probably had Haye losing 114-113 in a robbery against Wlad.

You sound like D4. Which should be enough to make you kill yourself when Haye never makes much of a comeback and retires leaving you with a big huge void as you only follow one fighter and mistakenly came on a forum for boxing fans as opposed to fans of one fighter.

https://www.606v2.com/t35608p50-time-to-man-up-vitali#1592590

Will you all leave waingro alone. It's like having a little forum pet. Ok he's not housetrained but he won't bite... And neither should everyone else

It's like having a little forum pet

Said 'pet' can only be compared those candiru fish that swim up men's urethra.... Due to swimming up the pee-tube of a mans dong it never fails to constantly spout pi$$.

Coxy001 wrote:

It's like having a little forum pet

Said 'pet' can only be compared those candiru fish that swim up men's urethra.... Due to swimming up the pee-tube of a mans dong it never fails to constantly spout pi$$.

I thought you meant it was an excruciating experience and most men would rather cut their c*ck off than suffer it a minute longer

I was merely talking from the actual candiru fish's perspective.

But you rather aptly and accurately summarise our experience though Dave.

hayemaker wrote:Yeah Klitschko is rubbish, Valuev failed miserably, Haye is not world class. Call yourself boxing fans but all you do is pour negativity on boxers who have achieved far more in their lives than most people on here.

I wouldnt sweat it. They all beat Joe the cruiserweight Louis.

Hayemaker was politely asked to leave the site by the staff so until he creates a new account he won't be bothering anyone

hampo171 wrote:Hayemaker was politely asked to leave the site by the staff so until he creates a new account he won't be bothering anyone

Best WUM we have had on here for ages to be fair

hampo171 wrote:Hayemaker was politely asked to leave the site by the staff so until he creates a new account he won't be bothering anyone

Bullies.

He'll be back in 2015 and be a world champion poster once again.

Is it permanent Hampo or just temporary? and did you ever find out if he used to be D4/Waingrow etc?

Don't think it was D4. Waingrow/Young Towzer maybe......

No idea and as far as I'm aware the staff member has permanently banned him.

Cheers Hampo, even the worst of us know not to start a personal argument with the 'guards' of this asylum

Derbymanc wrote:Cheers Hampo, even the worst of us know not to start a personal argument with the 'guards' of this asylum

Thats a bit confrontational. Which moderator wants to deal with it?

Must be a conundrum for Adam.

"Here's another muppet, better ban him. Hmmm, if we ban all the muppets all we'd be left with is moderators... Chris writing large monologues and rowley moderating him with the occasional pithy comment. It doesn't fit well with our business plan growth projection but it would be far less hassle."

hampo171 wrote:No idea and as far as I'm aware the staff member has permanently banned him.

I don't do half measures.

Rowley wrote:

hampo171 wrote:No idea and as far as I'm aware the staff member has permanently banned him.

I don't do half measures.

Tell me about it!

Truss's wife has told him the same thing

Anyway I'm saddened by the loss of Hayemaker as I've now being reinstated as the boards number one David Haye nuthugger. I was grateful for the break to be honest but no rest for the wicked...unlike Mr Haye who seems to have upped his training for a comeback by unbraiding his hair and flying off on holiday.

Slowly slowly catchee monkey, eh David!!!

Can't say that I understand the ban, yeah he was either a wum or in love with haye. I must have missed where he broke the house rules. He threw a large net, and caught a lot of posters (me included), but the nonsense in that thread has been keeping the boards ticking over the quiet post Xmas period.

Honestly Jim, I PM'd him trying to get him to cool it with wumming and instead of seeing my reasoning he acting like a spoilt kid and got quite aggressive, was borderline booting him myself.

hampo171 wrote:Honestly Jim, I PM'd him trying to get him to cool it with wumming and instead of seeing my reasoning he acting like a spoilt kid and got quite aggressive, was borderline booting him myself.

So we now know you've spoken with Strongy, but how did it go with hayemaker?

DAVE667 wrote:Truss's wife has told him the same thing

The only time she talks to me is during sex....."Have you put it in yet"!!

Hayemaker was as irritating as Strongy !!.......Hint hint...

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:

DAVE667 wrote:Truss's wife has told him the same thing

The only time she talks to me is during sex....."Have you put it in yet"!!

Hayemaker was as irritating as Strongy !!.......Hint hint...

"Yes, love....then taken it out again, washed it, dried it, put it back in my pants and f*cked off back downstairs to watch tv."

DAVE667 wrote:

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:

DAVE667 wrote:Truss's wife has told him the same thing

The only time she talks to me is during sex....."Have you put it in yet"!!

Hayemaker was as irritating as Strongy !!.......Hint hint...

"Yes, love....then taken it out again, washed it, dried it, put it back in my pants and f*cked off back downstairs to watch tv."

We have sex in the TV room............So we both can be spending time doing something we enjoy !!...

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:

DAVE667 wrote:

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:

DAVE667 wrote:Truss's wife has told him the same thing

The only time she talks to me is during sex....."Have you put it in yet"!!

Hayemaker was as irritating as Strongy !!.......Hint hint...

"Yes, love....then taken it out again, washed it, dried it, put it back in my pants and f*cked off back downstairs to watch tv."

We have sex in the TV room............So we both can be spending time doing something we enjoy !!...

So you both enjoy watching tv then?

DAVE667 wrote:

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:

DAVE667 wrote:

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:

DAVE667 wrote:Truss's wife has told him the same thing

The only time she talks to me is during sex....."Have you put it in yet"!!

Hayemaker was as irritating as Strongy !!.......Hint hint...

"Yes, love....then taken it out again, washed it, dried it, put it back in my pants and f*cked off back downstairs to watch tv."

We have sex in the TV room............So we both can be spending time doing something we enjoy !!...

So you both enjoy watching tv then?

and Re-enacting a pat butcher sex scene

I think you misunderstand. Courtesy of daddy in law, truss has a big house with 2 tv rooms. Truss has sex in one of them with whoever he dragged back from the oyster, while Mrs Truss has sex in the other, with the didsbury 1st 15.

Not a bad arrangement.

milkyboy wrote:with the didsbury 1st 15..

That's when she's not feeling up for it !!