QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
+89
des
Mad for Chelsea
The Great Aukster
allyt2k
mckay1402
Eejit
Fantasticbarnsmell
monty junior
demosthenes
fa0019
nobbled
Mr Fishpaste
Poorfour
overlordofthewest
profitius
2ndtimeround
No 7&1/2
MarcusHalberstram
westisbest
Cyril
gregortree
Hood83
TightHEAD
Notch
Hammersmith harrier
kingraf
Artful_Dodger
nathan
SimonofSurrey
Rory_Gallagher
sportform
offload
glamorganalun
BigGee
TheMildlyFranticLlama
reallybored
VinceWLB
highland_scot
NeilyBroon
disneychilly
lostinwales
whocares
madmaccas
alive555
geoff999rugby
RubyGuby
screamingaddabs
HammerofThunor
123456789.
Duty281
bsando
yappysnap
Sin é
Rugby Fan
ME-109
SecretFly
jimbopip
goneagain
BamBam
awayandbileyerheid
Majestic83
nickj
TJ
InjuredYetAgain
mikey_dragon
EWT Spoons
Tattie Scones RRN
GLove39
R!skysports
Fanster
RuggerRadge2611
maestegmafia
boomeranga
Prothero
Biltong
funnyExiledScot
MacKnocked-on
tigertattie
Shifty
majesticimperialman
Pal Joey
Nematode
bmcr
cakeordeath
21st Century Schizoid Man
RDW
LondonTiger
eirebilly
George Carlin
93 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Rugby Union :: International
Page 7 of 18
Page 7 of 18 • 1 ... 6, 7, 8 ... 12 ... 18
QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
First topic message reminder :
AUSTRALIA v SCOTLAND
18 October 2015
16:00 BST (UTC+01)
Twickenham, London
Live on telly
Ref: Craig Joubert (South Africa)
ARs: Glen Jackson (New Zealand) and Pascal Gauzere (France)
TMO: Ben Skeen (New Zealand)
A. Head to Head
28 Played 28
19 Won 9
0 Drawn 0
9 Lost 19
671 Points 330
B. Recent Form
23 November 2013
Murrayfield, Edinburgh
15 – 21 to Australia
5 June 2012
Hunter Stadium, Newcastle
6 – 9 to Scotland
21 November 2009
Murrayfield, Edinburgh
9 – 8 to Scotland
25 November 2006
Murrayfield, Edinburgh
15 – 44 to Australia
20 November 2004
Hampden Park, Glasgow
17 – 31 to Australia
C. TEAMS:
AUSTRALIA
15 Kurtley Beale; 14 Adam Ashley-Cooper, 13 Tevita Kuridrani, 12 Matt Giteau, 11 Drew Mitchell; 10 Bernard Foley, 9 Will Genia;
1 Scott Sio, 2Stephen Moore, 3 Sekope Kepu, 4 Kane Douglas, 5 Rob Simmons, 6 Scott Fardy, 7 Michael Hooper, 8 Ben McCalman.
Substitutes: 16 Tatafu Polota-Nau, 17 James Slipper, 18 Greg Holmes, 19 Dean Mumm, 20 Sean McMahon, 21 Nick Phipps, 22 Matt Toomua, 23 Quade Cooper.
SCOTLAND
15 Stuart Hogg; 14 Sean Maitland, 13 Mark Bennett, 12 Peter Horne 11 Tommy Seymour; 10 Finn Russell, 9 Greig Laidlaw;
1 Alasdair Dickinson, 2 Ross Ford, 3 Willem Nel, 4 Jonny Gray, 5 Richie Gray, 6 Blair Cowan, 7 John Hardie, 8 David Denton.
Substitutes: 16 Fraser Brown, 17 Gordon Reid, 18 Jon Welsh, 19 Tim Swinson, 20 Josh Strauss, 21 Henry Pyrgos, 22 Richie Vernon, 23 Sean Lamont.
AUSTRALIA v SCOTLAND
18 October 2015
16:00 BST (UTC+01)
Twickenham, London
Live on telly
Ref: Craig Joubert (South Africa)
ARs: Glen Jackson (New Zealand) and Pascal Gauzere (France)
TMO: Ben Skeen (New Zealand)
A. Head to Head
28 Played 28
19 Won 9
0 Drawn 0
9 Lost 19
671 Points 330
B. Recent Form
23 November 2013
Murrayfield, Edinburgh
15 – 21 to Australia
5 June 2012
Hunter Stadium, Newcastle
6 – 9 to Scotland
21 November 2009
Murrayfield, Edinburgh
9 – 8 to Scotland
25 November 2006
Murrayfield, Edinburgh
15 – 44 to Australia
20 November 2004
Hampden Park, Glasgow
17 – 31 to Australia
C. TEAMS:
AUSTRALIA
15 Kurtley Beale; 14 Adam Ashley-Cooper, 13 Tevita Kuridrani, 12 Matt Giteau, 11 Drew Mitchell; 10 Bernard Foley, 9 Will Genia;
1 Scott Sio, 2Stephen Moore, 3 Sekope Kepu, 4 Kane Douglas, 5 Rob Simmons, 6 Scott Fardy, 7 Michael Hooper, 8 Ben McCalman.
Substitutes: 16 Tatafu Polota-Nau, 17 James Slipper, 18 Greg Holmes, 19 Dean Mumm, 20 Sean McMahon, 21 Nick Phipps, 22 Matt Toomua, 23 Quade Cooper.
SCOTLAND
15 Stuart Hogg; 14 Sean Maitland, 13 Mark Bennett, 12 Peter Horne 11 Tommy Seymour; 10 Finn Russell, 9 Greig Laidlaw;
1 Alasdair Dickinson, 2 Ross Ford, 3 Willem Nel, 4 Jonny Gray, 5 Richie Gray, 6 Blair Cowan, 7 John Hardie, 8 David Denton.
Substitutes: 16 Fraser Brown, 17 Gordon Reid, 18 Jon Welsh, 19 Tim Swinson, 20 Josh Strauss, 21 Henry Pyrgos, 22 Richie Vernon, 23 Sean Lamont.
Last edited by George Carlin on Sun 18 Oct 2015, 3:05 pm; edited 6 times in total
George Carlin- Admin
- Posts : 15807
Join date : 2011-06-23
Location : KSA
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
Risky - its all been completely consistent and correct bar perhaps the week added for deterrence. if you understand the laws and the guidance on apllying them
Incidents putting the head and neck at risk are treated more harshly than those putting the body at risk
Incidents that attract a sanction on the field - that sanction is taken into account if a citing is issued and upheld in sentencing
Take the bosch incident - cos the tackled guy came down on his front he could and did put his hands out to break his fall - hence the lower sanction.
I am getting pretty peeved about this continual moaning about citings and sanctions when if you actually understand the process and take your blinkers off its really about as good as it could be.
Stop effing moaning you are hard done by =- we are not!
Incidents putting the head and neck at risk are treated more harshly than those putting the body at risk
Incidents that attract a sanction on the field - that sanction is taken into account if a citing is issued and upheld in sentencing
Take the bosch incident - cos the tackled guy came down on his front he could and did put his hands out to break his fall - hence the lower sanction.
I am getting pretty peeved about this continual moaning about citings and sanctions when if you actually understand the process and take your blinkers off its really about as good as it could be.
Stop effing moaning you are hard done by =- we are not!
TJ- Posts : 8630
Join date : 2013-09-22
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
Strauss for some reason has decided his boys are now going to take out their sense of injustice on the poor South Africans. Everyone is being dragged into this war!:
http://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/international/josh-strauss-we-ll-beat-south-africa-in-tribute-to-ford-and-gray-1.2391670
http://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/international/josh-strauss-we-ll-beat-south-africa-in-tribute-to-ford-and-gray-1.2391670
SecretFly- Posts : 31800
Join date : 2011-12-12
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
madmaccas wrote:GLove39 wrote:madmaccas wrote:https://vine.co/v/eEJ1aJl1Hpa
Trust me, once you've seen behind the scenes it all makes sense https://vine.co/v/eE6zmmtg3T6
Fantastic, good work!
You're infinitely better at making vines than I am GLove.
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
SecretFly wrote:Strauss for some reason has decided his boys are now going to take out their sense of injustice on the poor South Africans. Everyone is being dragged into this war!:
http://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/international/josh-strauss-we-ll-beat-south-africa-in-tribute-to-ford-and-gray-1.2391670
someones clearly optimistic of our chances, we wouldn't meet the Boks till the final...
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
Tj
Not sure why you feel the need to defend the citing but fair play
But even u can not with a straight face say the word consistant in the sentence can you
Read the citing. All the advice and suggested outcomes were over ruled (there words) to make this a statement fo others. That in it self says it is not consistent. It even ignored the actual ref PoV
Not consistent at all
Not sure why you feel the need to defend the citing but fair play
But even u can not with a straight face say the word consistant in the sentence can you
Read the citing. All the advice and suggested outcomes were over ruled (there words) to make this a statement fo others. That in it self says it is not consistent. It even ignored the actual ref PoV
Not consistent at all
R!skysports- Posts : 3667
Join date : 2011-03-17
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
Just seen on Twitter that the SRU have announced an appeal.
cakeordeath- Posts : 1949
Join date : 2012-11-25
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
Ah Frak. It's a retweet from someone. Never noticed it is the Daily Mail. Stand down. Nothing to see here
cakeordeath- Posts : 1949
Join date : 2012-11-25
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
Are yis going to get around to discussing the game anytime or are yis just going to keep bitching and Sobbing?
SecretFly- Posts : 31800
Join date : 2011-12-12
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
SecretFly wrote:Are yis going to get around to discussing the game anytime or are yis just going to keep bitching and Sobbing?
Come tomorrow we start afresh.
And with that in mind might, just going to use this last 20 minutes to call Scott Nowland & the QC's at world rugby a bunch of vindictive Fraknuckles
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
Apologies Glove for still talking about it, but...
Today is the deadline for launching an appeal, so if they do I'm assuming the hearing will be tomorrow. That puts the team in an awkward position because tomorrow is team announcement day - do you include Ford and Gray on the hope of appeal?
It can't be helping preparation either to be running with 3 hookers and different 2nd row combos to cover all eventualities.
As much as it sucks they'd almost be better off just taking the ban and planning without them.
I still think Ford has been incredibly hard done by - to be done for a leg lift tackle when he was no where near the player's legs.
Today is the deadline for launching an appeal, so if they do I'm assuming the hearing will be tomorrow. That puts the team in an awkward position because tomorrow is team announcement day - do you include Ford and Gray on the hope of appeal?
It can't be helping preparation either to be running with 3 hookers and different 2nd row combos to cover all eventualities.
As much as it sucks they'd almost be better off just taking the ban and planning without them.
I still think Ford has been incredibly hard done by - to be done for a leg lift tackle when he was no where near the player's legs.
RDW- Founder
- Posts : 33185
Join date : 2011-06-01
Location : Sydney
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
I think they will have to assume they are not playing. Even if they win the appeal then I think it will not be reduced to nothing
So team set up without them for this game and plan for them to be back for the final
So team set up without them for this game and plan for them to be back for the final
R!skysports- Posts : 3667
Join date : 2011-03-17
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
World Rugby on the fastrack to become the new FIFA !
21st Century Schizoid Man- Posts : 3564
Join date : 2011-05-31
Location : Glasgow
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
RDW_Scotland wrote:Apologies Glove for still talking about it, but...
Today is the deadline for launching an appeal, so if they do I'm assuming the hearing will be tomorrow. That puts the team in an awkward position because tomorrow is team announcement day - do you include Ford and Gray on the hope of appeal?
It can't be helping preparation either to be running with 3 hookers and different 2nd row combos to cover all eventualities.
As much as it sucks they'd almost be better off just taking the ban and planning without them.
I still think Ford has been incredibly hard done by - to be done for a leg lift tackle when he was no where near the player's legs.
Just checking, are you aware that Ford's account in the hearing had HIM saying that he lifted one leg?
HammerofThunor- Posts : 10471
Join date : 2011-01-29
Location : Hull, England - Originally Potteries
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
c'mon Scots , please knock those Aussies out of the world cup. their AAC and Kepu are needed by their new club asap!
whocares- Posts : 4270
Join date : 2011-04-14
Age : 47
Location : France - paris area
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
Apparently to be able to appeal they have to present new evidence not previously used in their argument, so as has been said the best we can hope for is a week or two struck off, and only likely for Ford.
RDW- Founder
- Posts : 33185
Join date : 2011-06-01
Location : Sydney
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
HammerofThunor wrote:RDW_Scotland wrote:Apologies Glove for still talking about it, but...
Today is the deadline for launching an appeal, so if they do I'm assuming the hearing will be tomorrow. That puts the team in an awkward position because tomorrow is team announcement day - do you include Ford and Gray on the hope of appeal?
It can't be helping preparation either to be running with 3 hookers and different 2nd row combos to cover all eventualities.
As much as it sucks they'd almost be better off just taking the ban and planning without them.
I still think Ford has been incredibly hard done by - to be done for a leg lift tackle when he was no where near the player's legs.
Just checking, are you aware that Ford's account in the hearing had HIM saying that he lifted one leg?
I didn't see that no. It certainly didn't look like he did from the video replays!
I'd still say that his clearout wasn't any different from a standard clear out you see 100 times in a game.
RDW- Founder
- Posts : 33185
Join date : 2011-06-01
Location : Sydney
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
Yeah, I didn't see he had lifted either but he said he did so he must of.
When I saw it in real time I wince as the guys neck bend. That doesn't happen in every game. It might be it happens regularly but isn't as clear on the camera and gets missed. But I don't think it's a case of being ignored.
When I saw it in real time I wince as the guys neck bend. That doesn't happen in every game. It might be it happens regularly but isn't as clear on the camera and gets missed. But I don't think it's a case of being ignored.
HammerofThunor- Posts : 10471
Join date : 2011-01-29
Location : Hull, England - Originally Potteries
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
HammerofThunor wrote:Yeah, I didn't see he had lifted either but he said he did so he must of.
When I saw it in real time I wince as the guys neck bend. That doesn't happen in every game. It might be it happens regularly but isn't as clear on the camera and gets missed. But I don't think it's a case of being ignored.
There's no doubting that it could have been dangerous - our main grip has been the inconsistency compared to other bans / non bans this world cup.
JP Pietersen did a very similar clearout against us (Swinson's legs were lifted above the horizontal) and didn't even get cited.
RDW- Founder
- Posts : 33185
Join date : 2011-06-01
Location : Sydney
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
#Breaking news#
Scotland to appeal both bans.
Scotland to appeal both bans.
RDW- Founder
- Posts : 33185
Join date : 2011-06-01
Location : Sydney
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
And so they should.
If they didn't, it shows a lack of support and belief in Ford & Gray's case. I would ask them to categorically state, on the record, their full justification for all other similar incidents and subsequent disciplinary action compared to what they dished out to our lads.
Anyway, Scotland need to use this farce as 'no more nails' bonding and come out stronger with a new found belief that Australia are going out in the 1/4 finals.
If they didn't, it shows a lack of support and belief in Ford & Gray's case. I would ask them to categorically state, on the record, their full justification for all other similar incidents and subsequent disciplinary action compared to what they dished out to our lads.
Anyway, Scotland need to use this farce as 'no more nails' bonding and come out stronger with a new found belief that Australia are going out in the 1/4 finals.
Tattie Scones RRN- Posts : 1803
Join date : 2011-05-24
Age : 48
Location : Scottish Rugby Purgatory
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
I do suspect it is more the principle of it and showing they support their players as opposed to any real hope that they will be available this weekend.
RDW- Founder
- Posts : 33185
Join date : 2011-06-01
Location : Sydney
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
RDW - I'm sure this has been asked a million times but what's wrong with the clock on 606?
RubyGuby- Posts : 7404
Join date : 2011-05-31
Location : UK
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
RubyGuby wrote:RDW - I'm sure this has been asked a million times but what's wrong with the clock on 606?
Your time zone was set to Micronesia - I've fixed it for you!
RDW- Founder
- Posts : 33185
Join date : 2011-06-01
Location : Sydney
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
The SRU are right to appeal, not only from a supporting the players point of view, but for the fact that we'll need them for the Semis. Positive thinking.
MacKnocked-on- Posts : 1274
Join date : 2012-01-24
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
The people who a reviewing the case have no power to cite players. They can only respond in the cases they're providing. Therefore, whether a player is cited or not is irrelevant because it's being reviewed by a completely different group of people (the Citing Commissioner). What they can base it on is other cases there were reviewed (for example Bosch, other types of offences, such as a punch are, again, irrelevant). In Bosch's case it was deemed that he actively tried to correct the issue and put the guy down safely when he realised the guy had tipped. He didn't, which is why he received a ban but it was deemed there was no 'driving', so it was 'just' a dangerous tackle. In this case it was taken that Lam was 'driven' into the ground (enough to bend his neck sideways) so they're different offences. I think the only change would be if this person didn't agree with the Bosch ruling, but that won't effect this one.
If that makes any sense.
If that makes any sense.
HammerofThunor- Posts : 10471
Join date : 2011-01-29
Location : Hull, England - Originally Potteries
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
Jesus....Ruby's been on Micronesia time for it must be a year now........... explains it all
SecretFly- Posts : 31800
Join date : 2011-12-12
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
I don't expect them to have their ban rescinded or shortened. That's not the point. What I would like to see is some consistency with sentencing.
Despite what body part is targeted I'm struggling to square off how deliberate and aggressive acts like Pocock and SOB's merit just one week bans where clumsy and accidental acts like Gray & Ford's merit 3 week bans.
Despite what body part is targeted I'm struggling to square off how deliberate and aggressive acts like Pocock and SOB's merit just one week bans where clumsy and accidental acts like Gray & Ford's merit 3 week bans.
RuggerRadge2611- Posts : 7194
Join date : 2011-03-04
Age : 39
Location : The North, The REAL North (Beyond the Wall)
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
On another note, couldn't they get off on a technicality.
Since they were not "tackling" the player as such?
Will some sort of Lawyer's prattle work in that particular case FES? GC?
Since they were not "tackling" the player as such?
Will some sort of Lawyer's prattle work in that particular case FES? GC?
RuggerRadge2611- Posts : 7194
Join date : 2011-03-04
Age : 39
Location : The North, The REAL North (Beyond the Wall)
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
What time is the team announced
I assume that they will still get at least a week ban, so we need to plan for that
I assume that they will still get at least a week ban, so we need to plan for that
R!skysports- Posts : 3667
Join date : 2011-03-17
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
RuggerRadge2611 wrote:On another note, couldn't they get off on a technicality.
Since they were not "tackling" the player as such?
Will some sort of Lawyer's prattle work in that particular case FES? GC?
In the full judgement the QC acknowledges that the law is intended for tackles but he says he is happy that this case meets all the requirements to be able to use that law.
RDW- Founder
- Posts : 33185
Join date : 2011-06-01
Location : Sydney
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
Riskysports wrote:What time is the team announced
I assume that they will still get at least a week ban, so we need to plan for that
Suspect it will be tomorrow - normally it is 2 days before.
RDW- Founder
- Posts : 33185
Join date : 2011-06-01
Location : Sydney
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
RuggerRadge2611 wrote:I don't expect them to have their ban rescinded or shortened. That's not the point. What I would like to see is some consistency with sentencing.
Despite what body part is targeted I'm struggling to square off how deliberate and aggressive acts like Pocock and SOB's merit just one week bans where clumsy and accidental acts like Gray & Ford's merit 3 week bans.
Aye but Radge, if you want to see consistency, then their bans should be shortened.
Tattie Scones RRN- Posts : 1803
Join date : 2011-05-24
Age : 48
Location : Scottish Rugby Purgatory
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
RDW_Scotland wrote:RuggerRadge2611 wrote:On another note, couldn't they get off on a technicality.
Since they were not "tackling" the player as such?
Will some sort of Lawyer's prattle work in that particular case FES? GC?
In the full judgement the QC acknowledges that the law is intended for tackles but he says he is happy that this case meets all the requirements to be able to use that law.
Well at least he's "happy".
I love how they waste money on a QC for this sort of thing. Shower of b£stards.
funnyExiledScot- Posts : 17072
Join date : 2011-05-31
Age : 43
Location : Edinburgh
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
RuggerRadge2611 wrote:I don't expect them to have their ban rescinded or shortened. That's not the point.
We don't need to beat them, just fight them.
It's movie quotes day.
funnyExiledScot- Posts : 17072
Join date : 2011-05-31
Age : 43
Location : Edinburgh
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
Because regardless of whether something is deliberate or intentionally the potential outcome is considered. RF/JG's acts had a higher potential for injury (and were against the Laws). If SOB's act hadn't have been intentional it wouldn't have got anything at all. If RF/JG had been deemed to do it deliberately they would have been out for months, not weeks.
The IRB are not going to reduce bans for tipping players so the only solution to your problem is to increase bans for things like punching. The mid level entry for a tip tackle is 8 weeks and this can still be for unintentional events (Warburton, 2011). That that would mean that a strike would have to have at least the same entry level as that. So all punches would carry an effective minimum of 4 weeks, starting at 8 weeks.
And I don't have a problem with that but it would need a change to the recommended sanction levels that World Rugby put out. These decisions so far seem to be consistent with those.
To clarify I got bored reading SOB's because it seemed clear cut and standard. I read Bosch's and Gray and Ford's. Haven't read Hooper's or Pocock's yet.
The IRB are not going to reduce bans for tipping players so the only solution to your problem is to increase bans for things like punching. The mid level entry for a tip tackle is 8 weeks and this can still be for unintentional events (Warburton, 2011). That that would mean that a strike would have to have at least the same entry level as that. So all punches would carry an effective minimum of 4 weeks, starting at 8 weeks.
And I don't have a problem with that but it would need a change to the recommended sanction levels that World Rugby put out. These decisions so far seem to be consistent with those.
To clarify I got bored reading SOB's because it seemed clear cut and standard. I read Bosch's and Gray and Ford's. Haven't read Hooper's or Pocock's yet.
HammerofThunor- Posts : 10471
Join date : 2011-01-29
Location : Hull, England - Originally Potteries
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
In honour of big Gordie Reid, one from Mighty Ducks:
Goldberg: Be careful man, it almost hit me that time!
Charlie Conway: Goldberg, you're the goalie. It's supposed to hit you.
Goldberg: Does that sound stupid to anyone else?
RDW- Founder
- Posts : 33185
Join date : 2011-06-01
Location : Sydney
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
http://m.smh.com.au/rugby-union/rugby-world-cup/scotland-deserve-wallabies-respect-at-rugby-world-cup-as-finn-russell-emerges-as-a-threat-20151014-gk9cxi.html
I like Cully.
I like Cully.
George Carlin- Admin
- Posts : 15807
Join date : 2011-06-23
Location : KSA
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
SRU wrote:Scottish Rugby will appeal against the suspensions issued to both Ross Ford and Jonny Gray.
It will contest the length of suspensions given, following the Independent Citing Commissioner’s review of the final Rugby World Cup Pool B match versus Samoa on Saturday 10 October and subsequent ruling by Judicial Officer Christopher Quinlan QC.
Both players have exemplary records and are widely acknowledged as model professionals who play the game in the right spirit. Their actions had no malice or harmful intention.
Ross and Jonny have both expressed their surprise and disappointment at the three-week suspension which has been handed down.
Scottish Rugby Chief Executive, Mark Dodson, said: “We hold Ross and Jonny in very high regard and as a result will be launching a robust appeal to challenge their suspensions, which we feel are unduly harsh.
“I have raised their case with Brett Gosper at World Rugby and asked for consistency in how such incidents are punished.
“It is clear other Unions are also seeking better clarity on the use of citing and the interpretation of how key areas of the game are scrutinised and the subsequent levels of punishment set.”
RDW- Founder
- Posts : 33185
Join date : 2011-06-01
Location : Sydney
funnyExiledScot- Posts : 17072
Join date : 2011-05-31
Age : 43
Location : Edinburgh
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
SecretFly wrote:Jesus....Ruby's been on Micronesia time for it must be a year now........... explains it all
I'm still looking forward to the 2015 RWC but I think we're fecked against England because of the injuries. then again what the feck do I know. Good luck against those minnows
RubyGuby- Posts : 7404
Join date : 2011-05-31
Location : UK
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
George Carlin wrote:http://m.smh.com.au/rugby-union/rugby-world-cup/scotland-deserve-wallabies-respect-at-rugby-world-cup-as-finn-russell-emerges-as-a-threat-20151014-gk9cxi.html
I like Cully.
Absolutely. Can't beat a journalist with something nice to say about Scottish rugby.
I still think that Russell has yet to really stamp himself on this Scottish team. Plenty more to come from him.
funnyExiledScot- Posts : 17072
Join date : 2011-05-31
Age : 43
Location : Edinburgh
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
RDW_Scotland wrote:RuggerRadge2611 wrote:On another note, couldn't they get off on a technicality.
Since they were not "tackling" the player as such?
Will some sort of Lawyer's prattle work in that particular case FES? GC?
In the full judgement the QC acknowledges that the law is intended for tackles but he says he is happy that this case meets all the requirements to be able to use that law.
He says the Law doesn't mention tackles. 10.4(j) is "Lifting a player from the ground and dropping or driving that player into the ground whilst that player's feet are still off the ground such that the player's head and/or upper body come into contact with the ground is dangerous play." The query was whether, since he was in contact with the ground, was he lifted from the ground. They also tried to got off with it by saying they didn't tip him beyond the horizontal because he was already tilted while going for the ball. Again, the laws don't mention "beyond the horizontal" at all. That's just guidance to the refs. They also tried to say that the guys was never at risk of injury, and that was cowpat too. Their defence seemed to be based on trying to get off on a technicality (without knowing what the laws are). Whoever the Scottish teams's legal advisor/rep is should probably get fired (unless he was told they had to plead not guilty to try and make the QF).
HammerofThunor- Posts : 10471
Join date : 2011-01-29
Location : Hull, England - Originally Potteries
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
funnyExiledScot wrote:George Carlin wrote:http://m.smh.com.au/rugby-union/rugby-world-cup/scotland-deserve-wallabies-respect-at-rugby-world-cup-as-finn-russell-emerges-as-a-threat-20151014-gk9cxi.html
I like Cully.
Absolutely. Can't beat a journalist with something nice to say about Scottish rugby.
I still think that Russell has yet to really stamp himself on this Scottish team. Plenty more to come from him.
I was sold after his opening paragraph where he pretty much says wilson should be banned and Ford and Gray not. I think every Scottish fan would happily take that.
EWT Spoons- Posts : 3799
Join date : 2012-02-02
Location : Edinburgh
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
That was my suggested plea bargain. Perhaps throw in Strokosch as a bonus.
funnyExiledScot- Posts : 17072
Join date : 2011-05-31
Age : 43
Location : Edinburgh
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
HammerofThunor wrote:RDW_Scotland wrote:RuggerRadge2611 wrote:On another note, couldn't they get off on a technicality.
Since they were not "tackling" the player as such?
Will some sort of Lawyer's prattle work in that particular case FES? GC?
In the full judgement the QC acknowledges that the law is intended for tackles but he says he is happy that this case meets all the requirements to be able to use that law.
He says the Law doesn't mention tackles. 10.4(j) is "Lifting a player from the ground and dropping or driving that player into the ground whilst that player's feet are still off the ground such that the player's head and/or upper body come into contact with the ground is dangerous play." The query was whether, since he was in contact with the ground, was he lifted from the ground. They also tried to got off with it by saying they didn't tip him beyond the horizontal because he was already tilted while going for the ball. Again, the laws don't mention "beyond the horizontal" at all. That's just guidance to the refs. They also tried to say that the guys was never at risk of injury, and that was cowpat too. Their defence seemed to be based on trying to get off on a technicality (without knowing what the laws are). Whoever the Scottish teams's legal advisor/rep is should probably get fired (unless he was told they had to plead not guilty to try and make the QF).
It's interesting that a QC believes that Ross Ford committed this offence.
funnyExiledScot- Posts : 17072
Join date : 2011-05-31
Age : 43
Location : Edinburgh
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
George Carlin wrote:http://m.smh.com.au/rugby-union/rugby-world-cup/scotland-deserve-wallabies-respect-at-rugby-world-cup-as-finn-russell-emerges-as-a-threat-20151014-gk9cxi.html
I like Cully.
My biggest concern with that article is that it has shown a starting XV with Wilson playing.
RDW- Founder
- Posts : 33185
Join date : 2011-06-01
Location : Sydney
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
Ford said he lifted him. That's a pretty convincing argument.
HammerofThunor- Posts : 10471
Join date : 2011-01-29
Location : Hull, England - Originally Potteries
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
I think one of the outcomes of this is that I fully expect all games to end up with no players
as that sort of clear out happens all the time - and if they want to be consistent (and people will now watch for it) then they have to be consistent
as that sort of clear out happens all the time - and if they want to be consistent (and people will now watch for it) then they have to be consistent
R!skysports- Posts : 3667
Join date : 2011-03-17
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
Will be interesting to see how the clear outs happen when Pocock and Hooper get over the ball in their strong jackle position – if you can’t get your shoulders lower then theirs and blast them out the way your options are to use their upper body/shoulders to roll them out the way, or to lift their leg for a similar purpose. The latter technique is what caused Ford and Gray problems.
RDW- Founder
- Posts : 33185
Join date : 2011-06-01
Location : Sydney
Re: QF4: Australia v Scotland, 18 October
funnyExiledScot wrote:That was my suggested plea bargain. Perhaps throw in Strokosch as a bonus.
I like it. How can we involve Scott Johnson in this as well?
EWT Spoons- Posts : 3799
Join date : 2012-02-02
Location : Edinburgh
Page 7 of 18 • 1 ... 6, 7, 8 ... 12 ... 18
Similar topics
» England vs Australia, 3 October
» SF2: Argentina v Australia, 25 October
» RWC Final: NEW ZEALAND v AUSTRALIA, 31 October
» England v Australia, 3 October - The Cool Down Thread
» Australia vs Wales RWC Pool A 10th October
» SF2: Argentina v Australia, 25 October
» RWC Final: NEW ZEALAND v AUSTRALIA, 31 October
» England v Australia, 3 October - The Cool Down Thread
» Australia vs Wales RWC Pool A 10th October
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Rugby Union :: International
Page 7 of 18
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum