Lions 2017 - the decider

by **RDW** Wed May 31, 2017 9:03 am

First topic message reminder :

Lions 2017 - the decider - Page 3 R2fRSPlg

After months if not years, of debate, arguments and plenty bickering the time has come - The Lions are in New Zealand and the tour has begun!

I think it is fair to say that if you're not a fan of the concept of the Lions then this isn't the thread to bring it up - we have had plenty of that over several months and the debate has been done to death. This thread will hopefully be a positive place where those excited about the tour (like me!) can talk about everything that's going on. That's until Jamie Roberts gets a callup of course... Run

3 June - Provincial union team (Toll Stadium, Whangarei)

7 June - Blues (Eden Park, Auckland)

10 June - Crusaders (AMI Stadium, Christchurch)

13 June - Highlanders (Forsyth Barr Stadium, Dunedin)

17 June - Maori (International Stadium, Rotorua)

20 June - Chiefs (Waikato Stadium, Hamilton)

24 June - New Zealand (First Test, Eden Park, Auckland)

27 June - Hurricanes (Westpac Stadium, Wellington)

1 July - New Zealand (Second Test, Westpac Stadium, Wellington)

8 July - New Zealand (Third Test, Eden Park, Auckland)

Lions 2017 - the decider - Page 3 Lions20131024x768_2947826

Lions 2017 - the decider - Page 3 Lions20131024x768_2947826

by **RDW** Wed Jun 07, 2017 12:52 pm

So bearing mind that this is meant to be a safe place for Lions fans - how is everyone enjoying the tour so far...? Crying or Very sad

by aucklandlaurie Wed Jun 07, 2017 1:04 pm

RDW_Scotland wrote:So bearing mind that this is meant to be a safe place for Lions fans - how is everyone enjoying the tour so far...?

I think its great - But I'm not a lions fan.

by RuggerRadge2611 Wed Jun 07, 2017 1:08 pm

Well watching the Lions catapulting large centres and loose forwards up the middle is hardly inspiring. It's painfully predictable and the well drilled Super Rugby defences don't even look remotely intimidated or bothered by this attacking game plan.

The NZ teams thusfar have been the ones playing rugby.

by **George Carlin** Wed Jun 07, 2017 1:15 pm

aucklandlaurie wrote:
RDW_Scotland wrote:So bearing mind that this is meant to be a safe place for Lions fans - how is everyone enjoying the tour so far...?

I think its great - But I'm not a lions fan.

by EST Wed Jun 07, 2017 1:27 pm

Well, it was certainly an improvement on the first game, and I am still hopeful the Lions can fashion a competitive team in time for the first test. However, there are obviously big question marks surrounding our attacking shape. We need our first choice midfield and halfbacks to start emerging pretty soon, so we can build that understanding and cohesiveness. I really think that Gatland has missed a trick by picking Farrell as a 10 - I think we need that second ball player in the midfield, a tactic that Gatland obviously doesn't like. We are left with Henshaw or Te'o playing one up rugby off the 10, and then playing into space after that - not a tactic that will trouble the AB's.

by **RDW** Wed Jun 07, 2017 1:30 pm

I didn't see the game today but from the last game and reading comments about this one it seems like we're not very good at bringing our outside backs into the game - Seymour and Hogg had to go looking for ball last week and sounds like the wingers today didn't have much of a chance to shine as they weren't given much ball in space.

As has been said that might be helped by playing Farrell at 12 but I don't see it happening - and it might not solve much given Sexton's form.

by EST Wed Jun 07, 2017 1:40 pm

Without watching the game back, we seemed to be employing a lot of screen passes, in the rugby league/sarries mould - however, we were doing it well behind the gain line, without conviction, and the Blues simply drifted onto the next man, meaning we ran out of space laterally. Despite Henshaw being there to provide a focal point of our attack, we didn't actually get him involved in the match very much.

Essentially we were stuck playing in no mans land, nobody carrying the ball over the gain line, and without the second ball playing option, we struggled to effectively get our outside backs into any space.

by eirebilly Wed Jun 07, 2017 2:41 pm

The backs got the ball today, especially whilst Payne was on. Finishing was an issue but the room was there and space created.

I thought that Biggar was having a good game until he went off injured to be replaced by Sexton who I thought offered very little shape in attack. The loss of Payne was crucial though, he marshalled the midfield defence well and was very lively in attack.

Nowell has been focused on a bit too much, he really did not have a very bad game. A few individual errors back to back made it look bad. I still do not think he was at fault for the first try, Haskell ran up out of the line unnecessarily which caused Nowell to have to move inside to cover Haskell's man and as such was in no position to catch Ioane.

by EST Wed Jun 07, 2017 2:45 pm

eirebilly wrote:The backs got the ball today, especially whilst Payne was on. Finishing was an issue but the room was there and space created.

I thought that Biggar was having a good game until he went off injured to be replaced by Sexton who I thought offered very little shape in attack. The loss of Payne was crucial though, he marshalled the midfield defence well and was very lively in attack.

Nowell has been focused on a bit too much, he really did not have a very bad game. A few individual errors back to back made it look bad. I still do not think he was at fault for the first try, Haskell ran up out of the line unnecessarily which caused Nowell to have to move inside to cover Haskell's man and as such was in no position to catch Ioane.

I have to say Eirebilly, that's certainly not the impression I got from the game. We may have had lots of the ball, but we certainly didn't create much with it. I will have to re-watch the game, but we were lateral and I can't recall us creating much space.

by Cyril Wed Jun 07, 2017 2:51 pm

EST wrote:
eirebilly wrote:The backs got the ball today, especially whilst Payne was on. Finishing was an issue but the room was there and space created.

I thought that Biggar was having a good game until he went off injured to be replaced by Sexton who I thought offered very little shape in attack. The loss of Payne was crucial though, he marshalled the midfield defence well and was very lively in attack.

Nowell has been focused on a bit too much, he really did not have a very bad game. A few individual errors back to back made it look bad. I still do not think he was at fault for the first try, Haskell ran up out of the line unnecessarily which caused Nowell to have to move inside to cover Haskell's man and as such was in no position to catch Ioane.

I have to say Eirebilly, that's certainly not the impression I got from the game. We may have had lots of the ball, but we certainly didn't create much with it. I will have to re-watch the game, but we were lateral and I can't recall us creating much space.

I don't recall Payne being 'lively in attack' either (nobody for the Lions was or has been in either game). Payne defends well enough, but when the Lions attacked the bit that stuck out for me was when he was penalised for crossing.

by eirebilly Wed Jun 07, 2017 2:53 pm

Early on in the game I thought that there was a lot of space being created. Twice over the tryline (disallowed tries) is a good example of the space created.

Biggar has coped a lot of flaq on here but he was certainly better than Sexton (who I feel is madly off form).

I also see Haskell getting a lot of praise but I thought he was poor today. I cant wait to see SOB given a chance as neither Haskell or POM (not very many minutes to prove himself) looked very good.

by eirebilly Wed Jun 07, 2017 2:55 pm

Cyril wrote:
EST wrote:
eirebilly wrote:The backs got the ball today, especially whilst Payne was on. Finishing was an issue but the room was there and space created.

I thought that Biggar was having a good game until he went off injured to be replaced by Sexton who I thought offered very little shape in attack. The loss of Payne was crucial though, he marshalled the midfield defence well and was very lively in attack.

Nowell has been focused on a bit too much, he really did not have a very bad game. A few individual errors back to back made it look bad. I still do not think he was at fault for the first try, Haskell ran up out of the line unnecessarily which caused Nowell to have to move inside to cover Haskell's man and as such was in no position to catch Ioane.

I have to say Eirebilly, that's certainly not the impression I got from the game. We may have had lots of the ball, but we certainly didn't create much with it. I will have to re-watch the game, but we were lateral and I can't recall us creating much space.
I don't recall Payne being 'lively in attack' either (nobody for the Lions was or has been in either game). Payne defends well enough, but when the Lions attacked the bit that stuck out for me was when he was penalised for crossing.

Because he expected Haskell to pass the ball instead of going into contact. If you watch back, had Haskell of passed to him, there was a decent hole for Payne to go threw. That was pure miss-communication to me.

by EST Wed Jun 07, 2017 2:57 pm

eirebilly wrote:Early on in the game I thought that there was a lot of space being created. Twice over the tryline (disallowed tries) is a good example of the space created.

Biggar has coped a lot of flaq on here but he was certainly better than Sexton (who I feel is madly off form).

I also see Haskell getting a lot of praise but I thought he was poor today. I cant wait to see SOB given a chance as neither Haskell or POM (not very many minutes to prove himself) looked very good.

Certainly there were a few instances, but I would say they were the exception not the rule.

I'd agree that Biggar was playing well before he went off, he ran with square shoulders and wasn't playing too deep. He could well usurp Sexton - who is playing as poorly as I have ever seen.

by **RDW** Wed Jun 07, 2017 2:58 pm

If Biggar is out does that mean Sexton will have to be involved in a 3rd game in the space of 7 days? He barely manges 3 games a month usually!

by eirebilly Wed Jun 07, 2017 2:59 pm

Exceptions to the rule by the end of the game, I will give you that thumbsup

Before the injuries, I thought the Lions were looking comfortable and quite attacking.

by eirebilly Wed Jun 07, 2017 3:00 pm

RDW_Scotland wrote:If Biggar is out does that mean Sexton will have to be involved in a 3rd game in the space of 7 days? He barely manges 3 games a month usually!

Hogg's chance to shine at 10 for the Lions coming up... Just like 4 years ago in OZ Wink

by tigertattie Wed Jun 07, 2017 3:18 pm

Surely it's going to have to be Farrell moved to 10?

by **RDW** Wed Jun 07, 2017 3:59 pm

My point was if Sexton is on the bench (as the only other fit 10) he'll have already played in 2 games this week. so far from ideal.

Saying that, Farrell is very unlikely to get subbed anyway so it would only be if he gets injured - Gatland might risk no 10 on the bench with Hogg or Laidlaw providing cover in an emergency. Would also mean he can bring another outside back on the bench to try out later on.

by eirebilly Wed Jun 07, 2017 4:02 pm

Its why I said that Hogg will probably be selected as cover for 10 RDW.

Sexton cant play again so soon.

by **RDW** Wed Jun 07, 2017 4:26 pm

So given the players due a start are we looking at

1 Vunipola
2 George
3 Furlong
4 AWJ
5 Kruis
6 PoM
7 SoB
8 Faletau

9 Murray
10 Farrell
11 North
12 Teo
13 Davies
14 Williams
15 Hogg

Subs - McGrath, Owens, Cole, Itoje, Warbuton, Laidlaw/Webb, JJ, Watson/Seymour

With question marks over 8, 12, 15 and the subs

by EST Wed Jun 07, 2017 5:21 pm

That looks about right to me, although I wonder if he is tempted to pick SOB at 8 and give Warburton some more game time.

by **RDW** Wed Jun 07, 2017 5:23 pm

EST wrote:That looks about right to me, although I wonder if he is tempted to pick SOB at 8 and give Warburton some more game time.

I think that would be a mistake - we desperately need to win this and need to have our best team out. There's not much between SoB and Warbs at 7 but there is a big difference between SoB and Faletau at 8.

Warbs will get 30 minutes or so and will have another 2 games before the tests to get up to speed.

by **George Carlin** Wed Jun 07, 2017 7:36 pm

eirebilly wrote:
RDW_Scotland wrote:If Biggar is out does that mean Sexton will have to be involved in a 3rd game in the space of 7 days? He barely manges 3 games a month usually!

Hogg's chance to shine at 10 for the Lions coming up... Just like 4 years ago in OZ

I'd be seriously urined off if that happened again.

Laidlaw has played a dozen test matches at 10 and so could cover at a push, particularly given that he was allowed to contribute precisely 4 minutes of his time today.

by Cyril Wed Jun 07, 2017 7:40 pm

It would be crazy to have either Hogg or Laidlaw as back-up 10 (and unfair on them too).

If there's any doubt on Biggar (and Sexton is always an injury risk) we need to get another 10 out there asap.

You should only have this situation if you get a freak set of injuries during a game ie when you lose both fly halves and have to re-shuffle.

by TightHEAD Thu Jun 08, 2017 11:32 am

It's crazy taking players who are not match fit in the hope they regain fitness and form.

by GunsGermsV2 Thu Jun 08, 2017 11:59 am

I wouldnt have brought Sexton even if he is the best OH he gets injured too much lately.

by **RDW** Sat Jun 10, 2017 5:15 pm

Fantastic attacking performance from Finn Russell today, albeit against an average Italy side. Highlights here

http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/40233474

by **George Carlin** Sun Jun 11, 2017 6:24 am

RDW_Scotland wrote:Fantastic attacking performance from Finn Russell today, albeit against an average Italy side. Highlights here

http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/40233474

If he can repeat that against the Wallabies next week, then he is definitely in the shop window for an injury call up.

Not that I think anyone other than Ford will be chosen as Gatland is still flirting with Farrell at 12.

by Gwlad Sun Jun 11, 2017 7:27 am

TightHEAD wrote:It's crazy taking players who are not match fit in the hope they regain fitness and form.

Injury is one thing, form another and Sexton proved how wrong you are today with a return to something like his best in various areas

whats crazy is not realizing that the chief role of a coach in the modern game on a tour is managing limited esources to optimize performance ; otherwise based on your stupid assumption, any injured player should be sent straight home.

by mikey_dragon Sun Jun 11, 2017 10:51 am

Gwlad wrote:
TightHEAD wrote:It's crazy taking players who are not match fit in the hope they regain fitness and form.

Injury is one thing, form another and Sexton proved how wrong you are today with a return to something like his best in various areas

whats crazy is not realizing that the chief role of a coach in the modern game on a tour is managing limited esources to optimize performance ; otherwise based on your stupid assumption, any injured player should be sent straight home.

Oh the child was wrong again? That's something we don't see often Whistle

by mikey_dragon Sun Jun 11, 2017 10:54 am

Moriarty is unavailable due to a back problem which occurred in the first tour game. Perhaps we should call up an additional back-row player as well as a 10 but surely the time to do that is now.

by Exiledinborders Sun Jun 11, 2017 2:40 pm

RDW_Scotland wrote:Fantastic attacking performance from Finn Russell today, albeit against an average Italy side. Highlights here

http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/40233474

Nobody doubts Russell's abilities especially against a poor side. He needs to prove he can make sensible decisions when under pressure. At the moment the jury is out.

by TightHEAD Sun Jun 11, 2017 7:26 pm

Beginning to look like Hogg might be out of the tour.

Mike Brown to replace Hogg or maybe Russell or Ford and rely on Watson Williams 1/2p Payne to cover FB???

by Gwlad Sun Jun 11, 2017 7:28 pm

Never Mike Brown he offers nothing but attitude and an inability to pass, was very poor against Argentina.
Watson, Half and Williams is plenty.

Happily see Watson start in the tests

by TightHEAD Sun Jun 11, 2017 7:30 pm

Hogg out might be good timing to bring in another fly half who is on form and un injuried

by Gwlad Sun Jun 11, 2017 7:31 pm

Not really since Biggar Farrell and Sexton are all fit.

by BigTrevsbigmac Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:03 pm

George Carlin wrote:
RDW_Scotland wrote:Fantastic attacking performance from Finn Russell today, albeit against an average Italy side. Highlights here

http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/40233474
If he can repeat that against the Wallabies next week, then he is definitely in the shop window for an injury call up.

Not that I think anyone other than Ford will be chosen as Gatland is still flirting with Farrell at 12.

Ford wasn't too shabby against Argentina either.

by mikey_dragon Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:59 pm

Both are able replacements but I think in most pundits and selectors eyes, Ford's stock is a little higher. Ford was particularly good though wasn't he?

by **RiscaGame** Sun Jun 11, 2017 9:42 pm

It would have to be Ford for me, if the need arose.

Though Anscombe is in NZ soon and Sir Warren is a bit of a fan.

by **RDW** Sun Jun 11, 2017 10:16 pm

I really don't think we'd need another replacement - there's plenty squad cover and he'd only be involved in one game at best.

Would be gutted for Hogg though.

by tigertattie Mon Jun 12, 2017 9:35 am

Where are folk getting reports that Hogg is out the tour now? I'm only seeing that he'll miss the next midweek game!

by **RDW** Mon Jun 12, 2017 9:37 am

tigertattie wrote:Where are folk getting reports that Hogg is out the tour now? I'm only seeing that he'll miss the next midweek game!

He's needing to see a specialist to see if it is worse than feared - with these kind of injuries you normally can't tell straight away due to the swelling.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/scotland/40239403

by EST Mon Jun 12, 2017 9:50 am

I really hope Hogg can get another chance during the tour, he is a special player.

From the three games, here is my stab at a selection for the first test, presuming Hogg is out:

1. Mcgrath
2. George
3. Cole
4. Kruis
5. Lawes
6. O'Mahoney
7. Tipuric
8. Faletau

9. Murray
10. Sexton
11. North
12. Farrell
13. Davies
14. Watson
15. Williams

16. Vunipola
17. Owens
18. Furlong
19. Itoje
20. O'Brien
21. Webb
22. Te'o
23. Daly

I don't think Gats will play Sexton/Farrell together, but after the weekend I really think he should. He stumbled onto that combination, and I think we saw signs of how well having two ball players in midfield could work. Yes, Goodhue exposed Farrell in defence, but I think that understanding would grow given some time together.

by BamBam Mon Jun 12, 2017 9:58 am

I know Farrell has got a lot of the blame for the break by Goodhue, but what happened to trusting your inside man? It seemed to me that whoever that was left far too much of a gap, Farrell was drifting and got stepped on the inside, but I don't think it was completely his fault

I'd like to see JJ outside a Sexton/Farrell combo but Saturday will be too soon to play JJ again after Tuesday so I think he's missed the boat

by EST Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:08 am

BamBam wrote:I know Farrell has got a lot of the blame for the break by Goodhue, but what happened to trusting your inside man? It seemed to me that whoever that was left far too much of a gap, Farrell was drifting and got stepped on the inside, but I don't think it was completely his fault

I'd like to see JJ outside a Sexton/Farrell combo but Saturday will be too soon to play JJ again after Tuesday so I think he's missed the boat

Like I said, I think the midfield defence would get better the longer Sexton/Farrell played together. I like JJ, but I think Davies has come into some great form over the tail end of the season and who has shown signs of being very dangerous this tour.

by BamBam Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:10 am

Agree with you that it'll improve, Sexton and Farrell are arguably the best defenders at fly half around, and Farrell hasn't come up short defensively at 12 either

by nickj Mon Jun 12, 2017 1:17 pm

Seems like Hogg might be ok http://www.talkingrugbyunion.co.uk/lions-have-enough-depth-in-squad-to-cover-for-hoggs-injury-andy-farrell/18296.htm

by **RDW** Mon Jun 12, 2017 1:26 pm

nickj wrote:Seems like Hogg might be ok http://www.talkingrugbyunion.co.uk/lions-have-enough-depth-in-squad-to-cover-for-hoggs-injury-andy-farrell/18296.htm

All I read from that was the he was going to be given all the time he needed, and that it is too early to tell yet?

by eirebilly Mon Jun 12, 2017 1:40 pm

I would hope the backline looks like this :

09 : Murray
10 : Farrell
11 : North
12 : Henshaw (although Te'o has played very well)
13 : Davies (JJ is in for a big shout as is Payne if he stays uninjured)
14 : Watson
15 : Hogg (injury permitting) or Payne (if he shows up well tomorrow). I like Williams but not so sure of his confidence right now.

I really do not wish to see a Farrell / Sexton 10 / 12 pairing against the AB's.

by **RDW** Mon Jun 12, 2017 1:43 pm

There is very little justification in picking Williams based on his performances just now - he looks shot of confidence on the pitch, especially under high ball chases which will be a key tactic for the Lions.

I don't think he should be in the test team IMO.

by Sponsored content